[拇外翻手术中硬底鞋与倒底鞋的比较:临床、功能和放射学分析]。

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2022-11-01
J A Calle-García, M Matas-Pareja, D Campillo-Recio, S Rivera-Fierres, G Albertí-Fitó
{"title":"[拇外翻手术中硬底鞋与倒底鞋的比较:临床、功能和放射学分析]。","authors":"J A Calle-García,&nbsp;M Matas-Pareja,&nbsp;D Campillo-Recio,&nbsp;S Rivera-Fierres,&nbsp;G Albertí-Fitó","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the orthopedic shoe is usually prescribed during postoperative care after hallux valgus surgery to protect the osteotomy and provide functional comfort to the patient. In this regard, the superiority of rigid sole shoe (RSS) compared to the reverse camber shoe (RCS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes from using the rigid sole shoe (RSS) vs. the reverse camber shoe (RCS) after hallux valgus surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>fifty-seven hallux valgus surgery patients were included and analyzed retrospectively. The 1st group included 28 patients using the RSS and the 2nd group included 29 patients using the RCS. The orthopedic shoe was used for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical data (lumbar and lower limb pain, need of crutches and problems with going up and down stairs), radiological data (IMA, HVA) and postoperative complications (displacement of osteotomy, metatarsal fracture or non-union) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the RSS showed less difficulty going up and down stairs (OR 3.8 (CI 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), only going upstairs (OR 3.2 (CI 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), as well as a decreased need for crutches (OR 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). Lumbar spine or lower limb pain did not show any statistical differences. No statistical differences in the epidemiological and radiological data were found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the RSS seems to provide more comfort to the patients without worsening the radiological results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7081,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"36 6","pages":"373-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rigid sole shoe versus inverted sole shoe in hallux valgus surgery: clinical, functional and radiological analysis].\",\"authors\":\"J A Calle-García,&nbsp;M Matas-Pareja,&nbsp;D Campillo-Recio,&nbsp;S Rivera-Fierres,&nbsp;G Albertí-Fitó\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the orthopedic shoe is usually prescribed during postoperative care after hallux valgus surgery to protect the osteotomy and provide functional comfort to the patient. In this regard, the superiority of rigid sole shoe (RSS) compared to the reverse camber shoe (RCS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes from using the rigid sole shoe (RSS) vs. the reverse camber shoe (RCS) after hallux valgus surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>fifty-seven hallux valgus surgery patients were included and analyzed retrospectively. The 1st group included 28 patients using the RSS and the 2nd group included 29 patients using the RCS. The orthopedic shoe was used for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical data (lumbar and lower limb pain, need of crutches and problems with going up and down stairs), radiological data (IMA, HVA) and postoperative complications (displacement of osteotomy, metatarsal fracture or non-union) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the RSS showed less difficulty going up and down stairs (OR 3.8 (CI 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), only going upstairs (OR 3.2 (CI 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), as well as a decreased need for crutches (OR 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). Lumbar spine or lower limb pain did not show any statistical differences. No statistical differences in the epidemiological and radiological data were found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the RSS seems to provide more comfort to the patients without worsening the radiological results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"36 6\",\"pages\":\"373-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:矫形鞋通常在拇外翻手术后的术后护理中使用,以保护截骨并为患者提供功能舒适。在这方面,刚性鞋底鞋(RSS)与反弯度鞋(RCS)相比的优越性仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是比较拇外翻手术后使用硬底鞋(RSS)和反曲鞋(RCS)的临床、功能和放射学结果。材料与方法:对57例拇外翻手术患者进行回顾性分析。第一组包括28名使用RSS的患者,第二组包括29名使用RCS的患者。矫形鞋在术后使用了六周。收集临床数据(腰部和下肢疼痛、需要拐杖和上下楼梯的问题)、放射学数据(IMA、HVA)和术后并发症(截骨移位、跖骨骨折或不愈合)。结果:RSS显示上下楼梯的难度较小(OR 3.8(CI 95%1.2-12.8),p 0.02),仅上楼(OR 3.2(CI 95%1.1-10),p 0.03),对拐杖的需求也减少(OR 1.7(CI 95%1.04-2.6),p<0.03)。腰椎或下肢疼痛没有显示出任何统计差异。两组之间的流行病学和放射学数据没有发现统计学差异。结论:RSS似乎在不恶化放射学结果的情况下为患者提供了更多的舒适感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Rigid sole shoe versus inverted sole shoe in hallux valgus surgery: clinical, functional and radiological analysis].

Introduction: the orthopedic shoe is usually prescribed during postoperative care after hallux valgus surgery to protect the osteotomy and provide functional comfort to the patient. In this regard, the superiority of rigid sole shoe (RSS) compared to the reverse camber shoe (RCS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes from using the rigid sole shoe (RSS) vs. the reverse camber shoe (RCS) after hallux valgus surgery.

Material and methods: fifty-seven hallux valgus surgery patients were included and analyzed retrospectively. The 1st group included 28 patients using the RSS and the 2nd group included 29 patients using the RCS. The orthopedic shoe was used for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical data (lumbar and lower limb pain, need of crutches and problems with going up and down stairs), radiological data (IMA, HVA) and postoperative complications (displacement of osteotomy, metatarsal fracture or non-union) were collected.

Results: the RSS showed less difficulty going up and down stairs (OR 3.8 (CI 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), only going upstairs (OR 3.2 (CI 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), as well as a decreased need for crutches (OR 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). Lumbar spine or lower limb pain did not show any statistical differences. No statistical differences in the epidemiological and radiological data were found between the groups.

Conclusions: the RSS seems to provide more comfort to the patients without worsening the radiological results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信