基于韩国急性缺血性脑卒中死亡率和功能结局的医院表现比较

IF 6.9 2区 医学
Bosco Seong Kyu Yang, Minuk Jang, Keon-Joo Lee, Beom Joon Kim, Moon-Ku Han, Joon-Tae Kim, Kang-Ho Choi, Jae-Kwan Cha, Dae-Hyun Kim, Dong-Eog Kim, Wi-Sun Ryu, Jong-Moo Park, Kyusik Kang, Soo Joo Lee, Jae Guk Kim, Mi-Sun Oh, Kyung-Ho Yu, Byung-Chul Lee, Keun-Sik Hong, Yong-Jin Cho, Jay Chol Choi, Tai Hwan Park, Kyung Bok Lee, Jee-Hyun Kwon, Wook-Joo Kim, Sung Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Jun Lee, Sang-Hwa Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Juneyoung Lee, Philip B Gorelick, Hee-Joon Bae
{"title":"基于韩国急性缺血性脑卒中死亡率和功能结局的医院表现比较","authors":"Bosco Seong Kyu Yang,&nbsp;Minuk Jang,&nbsp;Keon-Joo Lee,&nbsp;Beom Joon Kim,&nbsp;Moon-Ku Han,&nbsp;Joon-Tae Kim,&nbsp;Kang-Ho Choi,&nbsp;Jae-Kwan Cha,&nbsp;Dae-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Dong-Eog Kim,&nbsp;Wi-Sun Ryu,&nbsp;Jong-Moo Park,&nbsp;Kyusik Kang,&nbsp;Soo Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jae Guk Kim,&nbsp;Mi-Sun Oh,&nbsp;Kyung-Ho Yu,&nbsp;Byung-Chul Lee,&nbsp;Keun-Sik Hong,&nbsp;Yong-Jin Cho,&nbsp;Jay Chol Choi,&nbsp;Tai Hwan Park,&nbsp;Kyung Bok Lee,&nbsp;Jee-Hyun Kwon,&nbsp;Wook-Joo Kim,&nbsp;Sung Il Sohn,&nbsp;Jeong-Ho Hong,&nbsp;Jun Lee,&nbsp;Sang-Hwa Lee,&nbsp;Ji Sung Lee,&nbsp;Juneyoung Lee,&nbsp;Philip B Gorelick,&nbsp;Hee-Joon Bae","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence suggests a correlation between modified Rankin Scale-based measures, an outcome measure commonly used in acute stroke trials, and mortality-based measures used by health agencies in the evaluation of hospital performance. We aimed to examine whether the 2 types of measures are interchangeable in relation to evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five outcome measures, unfavorable functional outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥2), death or dependency (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥3), 1-month mortality, 3-month mortality, and 1-year mortality, were collected for 8292 individuals who were hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke between January 2014 and May 2015 in 14 hospitals participating in the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea - National Institute of Health registry. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate per-hospital risk-adjusted outcome rates for each measure. Hospitals were ranked and grouped based on the risk-adjusted outcome rates, and the correlations between the modified Rankin Scale-based and mortality-based ranking and their intermeasure reliability in categorizing hospital performance were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the ranking based on the unfavorable functional outcome and that based on 1-year mortality resulted in a Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.29 and Kendall rank coefficient of -0.23, and the comparison of grouping based on these 2 types of ranks resulted in a weighted kappa of 0.123 for the grouping in the top 33%/middle 33%/bottom 33% and 0.25 for the grouping in the top 20%/middle 60%/bottom 20%, respectively. No significant correlation or similarity in grouping capacities were found between the rankings based on the functional outcome measures and those based on the mortality measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that regardless of clinical correlation at an individual patient level, functional outcome-based measures and mortality-based measures are not interchangeable in the evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10301,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"16 8","pages":"554-565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Hospital Performance in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Mortality and Functional Outcome in South Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Bosco Seong Kyu Yang,&nbsp;Minuk Jang,&nbsp;Keon-Joo Lee,&nbsp;Beom Joon Kim,&nbsp;Moon-Ku Han,&nbsp;Joon-Tae Kim,&nbsp;Kang-Ho Choi,&nbsp;Jae-Kwan Cha,&nbsp;Dae-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Dong-Eog Kim,&nbsp;Wi-Sun Ryu,&nbsp;Jong-Moo Park,&nbsp;Kyusik Kang,&nbsp;Soo Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jae Guk Kim,&nbsp;Mi-Sun Oh,&nbsp;Kyung-Ho Yu,&nbsp;Byung-Chul Lee,&nbsp;Keun-Sik Hong,&nbsp;Yong-Jin Cho,&nbsp;Jay Chol Choi,&nbsp;Tai Hwan Park,&nbsp;Kyung Bok Lee,&nbsp;Jee-Hyun Kwon,&nbsp;Wook-Joo Kim,&nbsp;Sung Il Sohn,&nbsp;Jeong-Ho Hong,&nbsp;Jun Lee,&nbsp;Sang-Hwa Lee,&nbsp;Ji Sung Lee,&nbsp;Juneyoung Lee,&nbsp;Philip B Gorelick,&nbsp;Hee-Joon Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence suggests a correlation between modified Rankin Scale-based measures, an outcome measure commonly used in acute stroke trials, and mortality-based measures used by health agencies in the evaluation of hospital performance. We aimed to examine whether the 2 types of measures are interchangeable in relation to evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five outcome measures, unfavorable functional outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥2), death or dependency (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥3), 1-month mortality, 3-month mortality, and 1-year mortality, were collected for 8292 individuals who were hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke between January 2014 and May 2015 in 14 hospitals participating in the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea - National Institute of Health registry. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate per-hospital risk-adjusted outcome rates for each measure. Hospitals were ranked and grouped based on the risk-adjusted outcome rates, and the correlations between the modified Rankin Scale-based and mortality-based ranking and their intermeasure reliability in categorizing hospital performance were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparison between the ranking based on the unfavorable functional outcome and that based on 1-year mortality resulted in a Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.29 and Kendall rank coefficient of -0.23, and the comparison of grouping based on these 2 types of ranks resulted in a weighted kappa of 0.123 for the grouping in the top 33%/middle 33%/bottom 33% and 0.25 for the grouping in the top 20%/middle 60%/bottom 20%, respectively. No significant correlation or similarity in grouping capacities were found between the rankings based on the functional outcome measures and those based on the mortality measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that regardless of clinical correlation at an individual patient level, functional outcome-based measures and mortality-based measures are not interchangeable in the evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"554-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009653\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的证据表明,基于改良Rankin量表的测量方法(一种常用于急性卒中试验的结果测量方法)与卫生机构在评估医院绩效时使用的基于死亡率的测量方法之间存在相关性。我们的目的是研究这两种测量方法在评估急性缺血性脑卒中的医院表现时是否可以互换。方法:收集2014年1月至2015年5月参与韩国卒中临床研究合作-国立卫生研究院登记的14家医院的8292例急性缺血性卒中住院患者的5个结局指标,不良功能结局(3个月修正Rankin量表评分≥2)、死亡或依赖(3个月修正Rankin量表评分≥3)、1个月死亡率、3个月死亡率和1年死亡率。采用层次回归模型计算每项措施的每家医院风险调整转归率。根据风险调整转归率对医院进行排名和分组,并分析基于修正Rankin量表的排名和基于死亡率的排名及其对医院绩效分类的测量间信度之间的相关性。结果:不良功能结局排序与1年死亡率排序比较,Spearman相关系数为-0.29,Kendall秩系数为-0.23,前33%/中33%/后33%分组的加权kappa为0.123,前20%/中60%/后20%分组的加权kappa为0.25。在基于功能结果测量的排名和基于死亡率测量的排名之间,没有发现分组能力的显著相关性或相似性。结论:本研究表明,无论患者个体水平的临床相关性如何,基于功能结局的指标和基于死亡率的指标在评估急性缺血性卒中的医院表现时是不可互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Hospital Performance in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Mortality and Functional Outcome in South Korea.

Background: Recent evidence suggests a correlation between modified Rankin Scale-based measures, an outcome measure commonly used in acute stroke trials, and mortality-based measures used by health agencies in the evaluation of hospital performance. We aimed to examine whether the 2 types of measures are interchangeable in relation to evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: Five outcome measures, unfavorable functional outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥2), death or dependency (3-month modified Rankin Scale score ≥3), 1-month mortality, 3-month mortality, and 1-year mortality, were collected for 8292 individuals who were hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke between January 2014 and May 2015 in 14 hospitals participating in the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea - National Institute of Health registry. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate per-hospital risk-adjusted outcome rates for each measure. Hospitals were ranked and grouped based on the risk-adjusted outcome rates, and the correlations between the modified Rankin Scale-based and mortality-based ranking and their intermeasure reliability in categorizing hospital performance were analyzed.

Results: The comparison between the ranking based on the unfavorable functional outcome and that based on 1-year mortality resulted in a Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.29 and Kendall rank coefficient of -0.23, and the comparison of grouping based on these 2 types of ranks resulted in a weighted kappa of 0.123 for the grouping in the top 33%/middle 33%/bottom 33% and 0.25 for the grouping in the top 20%/middle 60%/bottom 20%, respectively. No significant correlation or similarity in grouping capacities were found between the rankings based on the functional outcome measures and those based on the mortality measures.

Conclusions: This study shows that regardless of clinical correlation at an individual patient level, functional outcome-based measures and mortality-based measures are not interchangeable in the evaluation of hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信