预测心力衰竭患者收缩压的纵向机器学习模型。

Q2 Medicine
Roya Najafi-Vosough, Javad Faradmal, Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini, Abbas Moghimbeigi, Hossein Mahjub
{"title":"预测心力衰竭患者收缩压的纵向机器学习模型。","authors":"Roya Najafi-Vosough,&nbsp;Javad Faradmal,&nbsp;Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini,&nbsp;Abbas Moghimbeigi,&nbsp;Hossein Mahjub","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systolic blood pressure (SBP) strongly indicates the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients, as it is closely linked to the risk of death and readmission. Hence, maintaining control over blood pressure is a vital factor in the management of these patients. In order to determine significant variables associated with changes in SBP over time and assess the effectiveness of classical and machine learning models in predicting SBP, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis between the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved the analysis of data from 483 patients with HF who were admitted to Farshchian Heart Center located in Hamadan in the west of Iran, and hospitalized at least two times between October 2015 and July 2019. To predict SBP, we utilized a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) and mixed-effects least-square support vector regression (MLS-SVR). The effectiveness of both models was evaluated based on the mean absolute error and root mean squared error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LMM analysis revealed that changes in SBP over time were significantly associated with sex, body mass index (BMI), sodium, time, and history of hypertension (P-value < 0.05). Furthermore, according to the MLS-SVR analysis, the four most important variables in predicting SBP were identified as history of hypertension, sodium, BMI, and triglyceride. In both the training and testing datasets, MLS-SVR outperformed LMM in terms of performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results, it appears that MLS-SVR has the potential to serve as a viable alternative to classical longitudinal models for predicting SBP in patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":35174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/00/jpmh-2023-02-e226.PMC10468193.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Roya Najafi-Vosough,&nbsp;Javad Faradmal,&nbsp;Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini,&nbsp;Abbas Moghimbeigi,&nbsp;Hossein Mahjub\",\"doi\":\"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systolic blood pressure (SBP) strongly indicates the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients, as it is closely linked to the risk of death and readmission. Hence, maintaining control over blood pressure is a vital factor in the management of these patients. In order to determine significant variables associated with changes in SBP over time and assess the effectiveness of classical and machine learning models in predicting SBP, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis between the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved the analysis of data from 483 patients with HF who were admitted to Farshchian Heart Center located in Hamadan in the west of Iran, and hospitalized at least two times between October 2015 and July 2019. To predict SBP, we utilized a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) and mixed-effects least-square support vector regression (MLS-SVR). The effectiveness of both models was evaluated based on the mean absolute error and root mean squared error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LMM analysis revealed that changes in SBP over time were significantly associated with sex, body mass index (BMI), sodium, time, and history of hypertension (P-value < 0.05). Furthermore, according to the MLS-SVR analysis, the four most important variables in predicting SBP were identified as history of hypertension, sodium, BMI, and triglyceride. In both the training and testing datasets, MLS-SVR outperformed LMM in terms of performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results, it appears that MLS-SVR has the potential to serve as a viable alternative to classical longitudinal models for predicting SBP in patients with HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/00/jpmh-2023-02-e226.PMC10468193.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:收缩压(SBP)是心衰(HF)患者预后的重要指标,因为它与死亡和再入院的风险密切相关。因此,保持对血压的控制是治疗这些患者的重要因素。为了确定与收缩压随时间变化相关的重要变量,并评估经典模型和机器学习模型预测收缩压的有效性,本研究旨在对两者进行比较分析。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2015年10月至2019年7月期间入住伊朗西部哈马丹Farshchian心脏中心至少两次的483例HF患者的数据。为了预测SBP,我们使用了线性混合效应模型(LMM)和混合效应最小二乘支持向量回归(MLS-SVR)。基于平均绝对误差和均方根误差对两种模型的有效性进行了评价。结果:LMM分析显示,收缩压随时间的变化与性别、体重指数(BMI)、钠、时间和高血压史有显著相关性(p值< 0.05)。此外,根据MLS-SVR分析,确定了预测收缩压的四个最重要变量:高血压史、钠、BMI和甘油三酯。在训练和测试数据集上,MLS-SVR的性能都优于LMM。结论:基于我们的研究结果,MLS-SVR似乎有潜力作为预测心衰患者收缩压的经典纵向模型的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.

Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.

Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.

Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.

Objective: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) strongly indicates the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients, as it is closely linked to the risk of death and readmission. Hence, maintaining control over blood pressure is a vital factor in the management of these patients. In order to determine significant variables associated with changes in SBP over time and assess the effectiveness of classical and machine learning models in predicting SBP, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis between the two.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved the analysis of data from 483 patients with HF who were admitted to Farshchian Heart Center located in Hamadan in the west of Iran, and hospitalized at least two times between October 2015 and July 2019. To predict SBP, we utilized a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) and mixed-effects least-square support vector regression (MLS-SVR). The effectiveness of both models was evaluated based on the mean absolute error and root mean squared error.

Results: The LMM analysis revealed that changes in SBP over time were significantly associated with sex, body mass index (BMI), sodium, time, and history of hypertension (P-value < 0.05). Furthermore, according to the MLS-SVR analysis, the four most important variables in predicting SBP were identified as history of hypertension, sodium, BMI, and triglyceride. In both the training and testing datasets, MLS-SVR outperformed LMM in terms of performance.

Conclusions: Based on our results, it appears that MLS-SVR has the potential to serve as a viable alternative to classical longitudinal models for predicting SBP in patients with HF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The journal is published on a four-monthly basis and covers the field of epidemiology and community health. The journal publishes original papers and proceedings of Symposia and/or Conferences which should be submitted in English. Papers are accepted on their originality and general interest. Ethical considerations will be taken into account.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信