接受机械通气的化学性瘫痪儿童的疼痛评估和管理。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elyse L Laures, Cynthia M LaFond, Barbara St Marie, Ann Marie McCarthy
{"title":"接受机械通气的化学性瘫痪儿童的疼痛评估和管理。","authors":"Elyse L Laures, Cynthia M LaFond, Barbara St Marie, Ann Marie McCarthy","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2023403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is complex, specifically for children receiving mechanical ventilation who require neuromuscular blockade (NMB). No valid pain assessment method exists for this population. Guidelines are limited to using physiologic variables; it remains unknown how nurses are assessing and managing pain for this population in practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe how PICU nurses are assessing and managing pain for children who require NMB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative design was used with an electronic survey. Nurses were asked to respond to 4 written vignettes depicting a child who required NMB and had a painful procedure, physiologic cues, both, or neither.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 PICU nurses answered the survey. Nurses primarily used behavioral assessment scales (61.0%) to assess the child's pain. All nurses reported that physiologic variables are either moderately or extremely important, and 27.3% of nurses used the phrase \"assume pain present\" formally at their organization. When physiologic cues were present, the odds of a nurse intervening with a pain intervention were 23.3 times (95% CI, 11.39-53.92; P < .001) higher than when such cues were absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate variation in how nurses assess pain for a child who requires NMB. The focus remains on behavioral assessment scales, which are not valid for this population. When intervening with a pain intervention, nurses relied on physiologic variables. Decision support tools to aid nurses in conducting an effective pain assessment and subsequent management need to be created.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Assessment and Management for a Chemically Paralyzed Child Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Elyse L Laures, Cynthia M LaFond, Barbara St Marie, Ann Marie McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ajcc2023403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain assessment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is complex, specifically for children receiving mechanical ventilation who require neuromuscular blockade (NMB). No valid pain assessment method exists for this population. Guidelines are limited to using physiologic variables; it remains unknown how nurses are assessing and managing pain for this population in practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe how PICU nurses are assessing and managing pain for children who require NMB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional quantitative design was used with an electronic survey. Nurses were asked to respond to 4 written vignettes depicting a child who required NMB and had a painful procedure, physiologic cues, both, or neither.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 PICU nurses answered the survey. Nurses primarily used behavioral assessment scales (61.0%) to assess the child's pain. All nurses reported that physiologic variables are either moderately or extremely important, and 27.3% of nurses used the phrase \\\"assume pain present\\\" formally at their organization. When physiologic cues were present, the odds of a nurse intervening with a pain intervention were 23.3 times (95% CI, 11.39-53.92; P < .001) higher than when such cues were absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate variation in how nurses assess pain for a child who requires NMB. The focus remains on behavioral assessment scales, which are not valid for this population. When intervening with a pain intervention, nurses relied on physiologic variables. Decision support tools to aid nurses in conducting an effective pain assessment and subsequent management need to be created.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2023403\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2023403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿科重症监护室(PICU)的疼痛评估很复杂,特别是对于需要神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)的接受机械通气的儿童。该人群没有有效的疼痛评估方法。指南仅限于使用生理变量;目前尚不清楚护士在实践中是如何评估和管理这一人群的疼痛的。目的:描述PICU护士如何评估和管理需要NMB的儿童的疼痛。方法:采用横断面定量设计和电子调查。护士们被要求对4个书面小插曲做出回应,这些小插曲描述了一个需要NMB但经历了痛苦的手术、生理暗示、两者都有或两者都没有的孩子。结果:共有107名PICU护士回答了调查。护士主要使用行为评估量表(61.0%)来评估孩子的疼痛。所有护士都报告说,生理变量要么中等重要,要么极其重要,27.3%的护士在他们的组织中正式使用了“假设疼痛存在”这一短语。当存在生理线索时,护士进行疼痛干预的几率比没有生理线索时高23.3倍(95%CI,11.39-53.92;P<.001)。结论:这些结果表明护士评估需要NMB的儿童疼痛的方式存在差异。重点仍然放在行为评估量表上,这对这一人群来说是无效的。在进行疼痛干预时,护士依赖于生理变量。需要创建决策支持工具,帮助护士进行有效的疼痛评估和后续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Assessment and Management for a Chemically Paralyzed Child Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

Background: Pain assessment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is complex, specifically for children receiving mechanical ventilation who require neuromuscular blockade (NMB). No valid pain assessment method exists for this population. Guidelines are limited to using physiologic variables; it remains unknown how nurses are assessing and managing pain for this population in practice.

Objectives: To describe how PICU nurses are assessing and managing pain for children who require NMB.

Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative design was used with an electronic survey. Nurses were asked to respond to 4 written vignettes depicting a child who required NMB and had a painful procedure, physiologic cues, both, or neither.

Results: A total of 107 PICU nurses answered the survey. Nurses primarily used behavioral assessment scales (61.0%) to assess the child's pain. All nurses reported that physiologic variables are either moderately or extremely important, and 27.3% of nurses used the phrase "assume pain present" formally at their organization. When physiologic cues were present, the odds of a nurse intervening with a pain intervention were 23.3 times (95% CI, 11.39-53.92; P < .001) higher than when such cues were absent.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate variation in how nurses assess pain for a child who requires NMB. The focus remains on behavioral assessment scales, which are not valid for this population. When intervening with a pain intervention, nurses relied on physiologic variables. Decision support tools to aid nurses in conducting an effective pain assessment and subsequent management need to be created.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信