Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Q Freitas, Matheus L Oliveira
{"title":"光刺激荧光板的环境光暴露:可接受的图像质量有安全限制吗?","authors":"Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Q Freitas, Matheus L Oliveira","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To subjectively assess radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates exposed to clinical levels of ambient light prior to read-out to potentially set a safe limit for acceptable image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Six dental regions of a dry human skull were X-rayed using PSP plates from VistaScan and Express under four exposure times: 0.1, 0.2, 0.32, and 0.4 s. Before read-out, the PSP plates were exposed to ambient light for 0, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 s. Six observers were asked to classify the 288 resulting radiographs as acceptable or unacceptable based on the identification of anatomical structures and global image quality. The number of answers classifying radiographs as unacceptable was used to calculate a rejection rate; a pairwise comparison for better image quality was further conducted among radiographs considered acceptable. Reproducibility was tested by having 25% of all experimental groups reassessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from 0.87 to 1.00 and from 0.81 to 0.92, respectively. Exposure of PSP plates to ambient light increased rejection rates mostly as of 10 s. In the pairwise comparison, subtle differences were observed between radiographs obtained with PSP plates not exposed and those exposed to ambient light for 5 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambient light exposure of PSP plates impairs the image quality of radiographs. A safe limit of ambient light exposure of 5 s for VistaScan and Express should be considered. Ambient light exposure of PSP plates within safe limits can avoid retakes and reduce unnecessary patient exposure to X-rays.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"20230174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Q Freitas, Matheus L Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/dmfr.20230174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To subjectively assess radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates exposed to clinical levels of ambient light prior to read-out to potentially set a safe limit for acceptable image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Six dental regions of a dry human skull were X-rayed using PSP plates from VistaScan and Express under four exposure times: 0.1, 0.2, 0.32, and 0.4 s. Before read-out, the PSP plates were exposed to ambient light for 0, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 s. Six observers were asked to classify the 288 resulting radiographs as acceptable or unacceptable based on the identification of anatomical structures and global image quality. The number of answers classifying radiographs as unacceptable was used to calculate a rejection rate; a pairwise comparison for better image quality was further conducted among radiographs considered acceptable. Reproducibility was tested by having 25% of all experimental groups reassessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from 0.87 to 1.00 and from 0.81 to 0.92, respectively. Exposure of PSP plates to ambient light increased rejection rates mostly as of 10 s. In the pairwise comparison, subtle differences were observed between radiographs obtained with PSP plates not exposed and those exposed to ambient light for 5 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambient light exposure of PSP plates impairs the image quality of radiographs. A safe limit of ambient light exposure of 5 s for VistaScan and Express should be considered. Ambient light exposure of PSP plates within safe limits can avoid retakes and reduce unnecessary patient exposure to X-rays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20230174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?
Objectives: To subjectively assess radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates exposed to clinical levels of ambient light prior to read-out to potentially set a safe limit for acceptable image quality.
Methods and materials: Six dental regions of a dry human skull were X-rayed using PSP plates from VistaScan and Express under four exposure times: 0.1, 0.2, 0.32, and 0.4 s. Before read-out, the PSP plates were exposed to ambient light for 0, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 s. Six observers were asked to classify the 288 resulting radiographs as acceptable or unacceptable based on the identification of anatomical structures and global image quality. The number of answers classifying radiographs as unacceptable was used to calculate a rejection rate; a pairwise comparison for better image quality was further conducted among radiographs considered acceptable. Reproducibility was tested by having 25% of all experimental groups reassessed.
Results: Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from 0.87 to 1.00 and from 0.81 to 0.92, respectively. Exposure of PSP plates to ambient light increased rejection rates mostly as of 10 s. In the pairwise comparison, subtle differences were observed between radiographs obtained with PSP plates not exposed and those exposed to ambient light for 5 s.
Conclusions: Ambient light exposure of PSP plates impairs the image quality of radiographs. A safe limit of ambient light exposure of 5 s for VistaScan and Express should be considered. Ambient light exposure of PSP plates within safe limits can avoid retakes and reduce unnecessary patient exposure to X-rays.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X