新培训提供者宫内节育器插入的临床结果:ECHO试验经验

Q2 Medicine
Irina Yacobson , Valentine Wanga , Khatija Ahmed , Tsungai Chipato , Peter Gichangi , James Kiarie , Cheryl Louw , Susan Morrison , Margaret Moss , Nelly R. Mugo , Thesla Palanee-Phillips , Melanie Pleaner , Caitlin W. Scoville , Katherine K. Thomas , Kavita Nanda , for the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium
{"title":"新培训提供者宫内节育器插入的临床结果:ECHO试验经验","authors":"Irina Yacobson ,&nbsp;Valentine Wanga ,&nbsp;Khatija Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tsungai Chipato ,&nbsp;Peter Gichangi ,&nbsp;James Kiarie ,&nbsp;Cheryl Louw ,&nbsp;Susan Morrison ,&nbsp;Margaret Moss ,&nbsp;Nelly R. Mugo ,&nbsp;Thesla Palanee-Phillips ,&nbsp;Melanie Pleaner ,&nbsp;Caitlin W. Scoville ,&nbsp;Katherine K. Thomas ,&nbsp;Kavita Nanda ,&nbsp;for the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Data from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176026/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience\",\"authors\":\"Irina Yacobson ,&nbsp;Valentine Wanga ,&nbsp;Khatija Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tsungai Chipato ,&nbsp;Peter Gichangi ,&nbsp;James Kiarie ,&nbsp;Cheryl Louw ,&nbsp;Susan Morrison ,&nbsp;Margaret Moss ,&nbsp;Nelly R. Mugo ,&nbsp;Thesla Palanee-Phillips ,&nbsp;Melanie Pleaner ,&nbsp;Caitlin W. Scoville ,&nbsp;Katherine K. Thomas ,&nbsp;Kavita Nanda ,&nbsp;for the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Data from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176026/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151623000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151623000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的评估由新培训的临床医生进行宫内节育器(IUD)插入时,插入、排出和穿孔失败的发生率,并检查可能影响这些结果的因素。研究设计我们在对避孕选择和HIV结果证据(ECHO)随机试验的二次分析中,评估了在12个非洲地区放置宫内节育器后基于技能的结果。在试验开始之前,我们为临床医生提供了基于能力的宫内节育器培训,并提供持续的临床支持。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来检验与驱逐相关的因素。结果2582名首次尝试宫内节育器插入的宫内节育器受体中,141人(5.46%)插入失败,7人出现子宫穿孔(0.27%)。与非母乳喂养妇女(0.22%)相比,产后3个月内母乳喂养妇女穿孔更常见(0.65%)─16.9):383部分和110完整。24岁以上女性宫内节育器排出的风险较低(aHR 0.63,95%CI 0.50─0.78),在未产妇中可能更高。(aHR 1.65,95%CI 0.97─2.82)。母乳喂养(aHR 0.94,95%CI 0.72─1.22)对驱逐没有显著影响。宫内节育器排出率在试验的前三个月最高。结论本研究中sIUD插入失败率和子宫穿孔率与文献报道相当。这些结果表明,培训、持续的支持和应用新技能的机会有效地确保了接受新培训的提供者插入宫内节育器的妇女获得良好的临床结果。含义本研究的数据支持向项目经理、决策者和临床医生提出的建议,即当提供者接受适当的培训和支持时,宫内节育器可以安全地插入资源受限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience

Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience

Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience

Objectives

To assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes.

Study design

We evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion.

Results

Among 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial.

Conclusions

IUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers.

Implications

Data from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信