校正用于絮凝试验的破伤风类毒素替代国际标准的合作研究

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Rob Tierney, Jason Hockley, Shalini Rajagopal, Paul Stickings
{"title":"校正用于絮凝试验的破伤风类毒素替代国际标准的合作研究","authors":"Rob Tierney,&nbsp;Jason Hockley,&nbsp;Shalini Rajagopal,&nbsp;Paul Stickings","doi":"10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we report the results of a study to establish a replacement WHO International Standard (IS) for tetanus toxoid for use in flocculation test. The standard was calibrated in flocculation units (Lf) against the 2nd IS using the Ramon flocculation method. At its 70th meeting in October 2019, WHO ECBS established the material (coded 16/302) as the 3rd WHO IS, with an assigned value of 970 Lf/ampoule from the results of seventeen laboratories across ten different countries.</p><p>The study also provided an opportunity to assess the use of alternative methods for measuring Lf. Participants were asked to use an in-house Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) developed at NIBSC, or other suitable in-house methods, to determine ELISA-specific Lf values (Lf-eq units are specific only for pre-calibration of antitoxin in the flocculation test) of 16/302 to compare to those of the flocculation test. Nine laboratories participated by performing the NIBSC ELISA, one laboratory performed flocculation by laser light-scattering following an in-house protocol, and three laboratories performed ELISA following in-house protocols. The results intimate that these alternative methods could be useful for monitoring consistency of production at different stages of vaccine manufacturing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55369,"journal":{"name":"Biologicals","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101701"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative study for the calibration of a replacement International Standard for tetanus toxoid for use in flocculation test\",\"authors\":\"Rob Tierney,&nbsp;Jason Hockley,&nbsp;Shalini Rajagopal,&nbsp;Paul Stickings\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Here we report the results of a study to establish a replacement WHO International Standard (IS) for tetanus toxoid for use in flocculation test. The standard was calibrated in flocculation units (Lf) against the 2nd IS using the Ramon flocculation method. At its 70th meeting in October 2019, WHO ECBS established the material (coded 16/302) as the 3rd WHO IS, with an assigned value of 970 Lf/ampoule from the results of seventeen laboratories across ten different countries.</p><p>The study also provided an opportunity to assess the use of alternative methods for measuring Lf. Participants were asked to use an in-house Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) developed at NIBSC, or other suitable in-house methods, to determine ELISA-specific Lf values (Lf-eq units are specific only for pre-calibration of antitoxin in the flocculation test) of 16/302 to compare to those of the flocculation test. Nine laboratories participated by performing the NIBSC ELISA, one laboratory performed flocculation by laser light-scattering following an in-house protocol, and three laboratories performed ELISA following in-house protocols. The results intimate that these alternative methods could be useful for monitoring consistency of production at different stages of vaccine manufacturing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biologicals\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biologicals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105623000398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologicals","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105623000398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,我们报告了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在建立用于絮凝试验的破伤风类毒素替代品世界卫生组织国际标准(IS)。使用Ramon絮凝法在絮凝单元(Lf)中对照第二IS校准标准。在2019年10月举行的第70次会议上,世界卫生组织欧洲化学品安全委员会将该材料(编号16/302)确定为世界卫生组织第三个IS,根据10个不同国家17个实验室的结果,分配值为970 Lf/安瓿。该研究还提供了一个机会来评估测量Lf的替代方法的使用情况。参与者被要求使用NIBSC开发的内部酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)或其他合适的内部方法,以确定16/302的ELISA特异性Lf值(Lf-eq单位仅用于絮凝试验中抗毒素的预校准),并与絮凝试验的值进行比较。九个实验室参与了NIBSC-ELISA,一个实验室根据内部方案通过激光散射进行絮凝,三个实验室按照内部方案进行ELISA。研究结果表明,这些替代方法可能有助于监测疫苗生产不同阶段的生产一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative study for the calibration of a replacement International Standard for tetanus toxoid for use in flocculation test

Here we report the results of a study to establish a replacement WHO International Standard (IS) for tetanus toxoid for use in flocculation test. The standard was calibrated in flocculation units (Lf) against the 2nd IS using the Ramon flocculation method. At its 70th meeting in October 2019, WHO ECBS established the material (coded 16/302) as the 3rd WHO IS, with an assigned value of 970 Lf/ampoule from the results of seventeen laboratories across ten different countries.

The study also provided an opportunity to assess the use of alternative methods for measuring Lf. Participants were asked to use an in-house Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) developed at NIBSC, or other suitable in-house methods, to determine ELISA-specific Lf values (Lf-eq units are specific only for pre-calibration of antitoxin in the flocculation test) of 16/302 to compare to those of the flocculation test. Nine laboratories participated by performing the NIBSC ELISA, one laboratory performed flocculation by laser light-scattering following an in-house protocol, and three laboratories performed ELISA following in-house protocols. The results intimate that these alternative methods could be useful for monitoring consistency of production at different stages of vaccine manufacturing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biologicals
Biologicals 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biologicals provides a modern and multidisciplinary international forum for news, debate, and original research on all aspects of biologicals used in human and veterinary medicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and letters relevant to the development, production, quality control, and standardization of biological derived from both novel and established biotechnologies. Special issues are produced to reflect topics of particular international interest and concern.Three types of papers are welcome: original research reports, short papers, and review articles. The journal will also publish comments and letters to the editor, book reviews, meeting reports and information on regulatory issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信