Tanaporn Jaroenngarmsamer, Faysal Benali, Joachim Fladt, Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Michael Tymianski, Michael D Hill, Mayank Goyal, Aravind Ganesh
{"title":"在急性脑卒中中使用NCCT与MRI的简单测量方法评估皮质和皮质下脑萎缩。","authors":"Tanaporn Jaroenngarmsamer, Faysal Benali, Joachim Fladt, Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Michael Tymianski, Michael D Hill, Mayank Goyal, Aravind Ganesh","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A7981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Brain atrophy is an important surrogate for brain reserve, the capacity of the brain to cope with acquired injuries such as acute stroke. It is unclear how well atrophy measurements on MR imaging can be reproduced using NCCT imaging. We aimed to compare pragmatic atrophy measures on NCCT with MR imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis, including baseline NCCT and 24-hour follow-up MR imaging data from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide (NA-1) in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial. Cortical atrophy was measured using the global cortical atrophy scale, and subcortical atrophy was measured using the intercaudate distance-to-inner-table width (CC/IT) ratio. Agreement and correlation between these measures on NCCT and MR imaging were calculated using the Gwet agreement coefficient 1 and Pearson correlation coefficients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1105 participants in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, interpretable NCCT and 24-hour MR imaging were available in 558 (50.5%) patients (mean age, 67.2 [SD, 13.7] years; 282 women). Cortical atrophy assessments performed on NCCT underestimated atrophy severity compared with MR imaging (eg, patients with global cortical atrophy of ≥1 assessed on NCCT = 133/558 [23.8%] and on MR imaging = 247/558 [44.3%]; a 20.5% difference). Overall, cortical (ie, global cortical atrophy) atrophy assessments on NCCT had substantial or better agreement with MR imaging (Gwet agreement coefficient 1 of > 0.784; <i>P </i>< .001). Subcortical atrophy measures (CC/IT ratio) showed strong correlations between NCCT and MR imaging (Pearson correlation = 0.746, <i>P </i>< .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain atrophy can be evaluated using simple measures in emergently acquired NCCT. Subcortical atrophy assessments on NCCT show strong correlations with MR imaging. Although cortical atrophy assessments on NCCT are strongly correlated with MR imaging ratings, there is a general underestimation of atrophy severity on NCCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1144-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical and Subcortical Brain Atrophy Assessment Using Simple Measures on NCCT Compared with MRI in Acute Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Tanaporn Jaroenngarmsamer, Faysal Benali, Joachim Fladt, Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Michael Tymianski, Michael D Hill, Mayank Goyal, Aravind Ganesh\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A7981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Brain atrophy is an important surrogate for brain reserve, the capacity of the brain to cope with acquired injuries such as acute stroke. It is unclear how well atrophy measurements on MR imaging can be reproduced using NCCT imaging. We aimed to compare pragmatic atrophy measures on NCCT with MR imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis, including baseline NCCT and 24-hour follow-up MR imaging data from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide (NA-1) in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial. Cortical atrophy was measured using the global cortical atrophy scale, and subcortical atrophy was measured using the intercaudate distance-to-inner-table width (CC/IT) ratio. Agreement and correlation between these measures on NCCT and MR imaging were calculated using the Gwet agreement coefficient 1 and Pearson correlation coefficients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1105 participants in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, interpretable NCCT and 24-hour MR imaging were available in 558 (50.5%) patients (mean age, 67.2 [SD, 13.7] years; 282 women). Cortical atrophy assessments performed on NCCT underestimated atrophy severity compared with MR imaging (eg, patients with global cortical atrophy of ≥1 assessed on NCCT = 133/558 [23.8%] and on MR imaging = 247/558 [44.3%]; a 20.5% difference). Overall, cortical (ie, global cortical atrophy) atrophy assessments on NCCT had substantial or better agreement with MR imaging (Gwet agreement coefficient 1 of > 0.784; <i>P </i>< .001). Subcortical atrophy measures (CC/IT ratio) showed strong correlations between NCCT and MR imaging (Pearson correlation = 0.746, <i>P </i>< .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain atrophy can be evaluated using simple measures in emergently acquired NCCT. Subcortical atrophy assessments on NCCT show strong correlations with MR imaging. Although cortical atrophy assessments on NCCT are strongly correlated with MR imaging ratings, there is a general underestimation of atrophy severity on NCCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1144-1149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:脑萎缩是脑储备的重要替代品,脑储备是大脑应对急性中风等后天损伤的能力。目前尚不清楚使用NCCT成像可以在多大程度上重现MR成像上的萎缩测量结果。我们的目的是比较急性缺血性脑卒中患者NCCT和MR成像的实用性萎缩测量。材料和方法:这是一项事后分析,包括基线NCCT和奈林肽(NA-1)在接受脑卒中血管内血栓切除术(ESCAPE-NA1)试验的受试者中的安全性和有效性的24小时随访MR成像数据。皮质萎缩采用整体皮质萎缩量表进行测量,皮质下萎缩采用间隙距离与内表宽度(CC/IT)比值进行测量。分别使用Gwet一致性系数1和Pearson相关系数计算NCCT和MR成像上这些测量之间的一致性和相关性。结果:在ESCAPE-NA1试验的1105名参与者中,558名(50.5%)患者(平均年龄67.2 [SD,13.7]年;282名妇女)。与MR成像相比,对NCCT进行的皮质萎缩评估低估了萎缩的严重程度(例如,患有全脑皮质萎缩的患者 NCCT评估的≥1 = 133/558[23.8%]和MR成像 = 247/558(44.3%);20.5%的差异)。总体而言,NCCT上的皮质(即全脑皮质萎缩)萎缩评估与MR成像具有实质性或更好的一致性(Gwet一致性系数1> 0.784;P P 结论:在紧急获得性NCCT中,可以使用简单的测量方法来评估脑萎缩。NCCT上的皮质下萎缩评估显示与MR成像有很强的相关性。尽管NCCT的皮质萎缩评估与MR成像评级密切相关,但NCCT对萎缩严重程度的普遍低估。
Cortical and Subcortical Brain Atrophy Assessment Using Simple Measures on NCCT Compared with MRI in Acute Stroke.
Background and purpose: Brain atrophy is an important surrogate for brain reserve, the capacity of the brain to cope with acquired injuries such as acute stroke. It is unclear how well atrophy measurements on MR imaging can be reproduced using NCCT imaging. We aimed to compare pragmatic atrophy measures on NCCT with MR imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Materials and methods: This is a post hoc analysis, including baseline NCCT and 24-hour follow-up MR imaging data from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide (NA-1) in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial. Cortical atrophy was measured using the global cortical atrophy scale, and subcortical atrophy was measured using the intercaudate distance-to-inner-table width (CC/IT) ratio. Agreement and correlation between these measures on NCCT and MR imaging were calculated using the Gwet agreement coefficient 1 and Pearson correlation coefficients, respectively.
Results: Among 1105 participants in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, interpretable NCCT and 24-hour MR imaging were available in 558 (50.5%) patients (mean age, 67.2 [SD, 13.7] years; 282 women). Cortical atrophy assessments performed on NCCT underestimated atrophy severity compared with MR imaging (eg, patients with global cortical atrophy of ≥1 assessed on NCCT = 133/558 [23.8%] and on MR imaging = 247/558 [44.3%]; a 20.5% difference). Overall, cortical (ie, global cortical atrophy) atrophy assessments on NCCT had substantial or better agreement with MR imaging (Gwet agreement coefficient 1 of > 0.784; P < .001). Subcortical atrophy measures (CC/IT ratio) showed strong correlations between NCCT and MR imaging (Pearson correlation = 0.746, P < .001).
Conclusions: Brain atrophy can be evaluated using simple measures in emergently acquired NCCT. Subcortical atrophy assessments on NCCT show strong correlations with MR imaging. Although cortical atrophy assessments on NCCT are strongly correlated with MR imaging ratings, there is a general underestimation of atrophy severity on NCCT.
期刊介绍:
The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.