氟烷麻醉犬对质子泵抑制剂急性电药理学作用的体内分析:心血管不良事件的转化研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Ryuichi Kambayashi, Ai Goto, Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko, Yoshinori Takei, Atsushi Sugiyama
{"title":"氟烷麻醉犬对质子泵抑制剂急性电药理学作用的体内分析:心血管不良事件的转化研究。","authors":"Ryuichi Kambayashi,&nbsp;Ai Goto,&nbsp;Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko,&nbsp;Yoshinori Takei,&nbsp;Atsushi Sugiyama","doi":"10.2131/jts.48.375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is known to clinically induce hypomagnesemia, increasing the risk toward QT-interval prolongation and lethal ventricular arrhythmias, whereas PPIs can directly modulate cardiac ionic currents in the in vitro experiments. In order to fill the gap between those information, we assessed acute cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of sub- to supra-therapeutic doses (0.05, 0.5 and 5 mg/kg/10 min) of typical PPIs omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, using halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 6 for each drug). The low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole increased or tended to increase the heart rate, cardiac output and ventricular contraction, whereas the high dose plateaued and decreased them. Meanwhile, the low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole decreased the total peripheral vascular resistance, whereas the high dose plateaued and increased it. Rabeprazole decreased the mean blood pressure in a dose-related manner; moreover, its high dose decreased the heart rate and tended to reduce the ventricular contractility. On the other hand, omeprazole prolonged the QRS width. Omeprazole and lansoprazole tended to prolong the QT interval and QTcV, and rabeprazole mildly but significantly prolonged them in a dose-related manner. High dose of each PPI prolonged the ventricular effective refractory period. Omeprazole shortened the terminal repolarization period, whereas lansoprazole and rabeprazole hardly altered it. In effects, PPIs can exert multifarious cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological actions in vivo, including mild QT-interval prolongation; thus, PPIs should be given with caution to patients with reduced ventricular repolarization reserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":17654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","volume":"48 7","pages":"375-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo analysis of acute eletropharmacological effects of proton pump inhibitors using halothane-anesthetized dogs: a translational study of cardiovascular adverse events.\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichi Kambayashi,&nbsp;Ai Goto,&nbsp;Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko,&nbsp;Yoshinori Takei,&nbsp;Atsushi Sugiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.2131/jts.48.375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is known to clinically induce hypomagnesemia, increasing the risk toward QT-interval prolongation and lethal ventricular arrhythmias, whereas PPIs can directly modulate cardiac ionic currents in the in vitro experiments. In order to fill the gap between those information, we assessed acute cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of sub- to supra-therapeutic doses (0.05, 0.5 and 5 mg/kg/10 min) of typical PPIs omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, using halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 6 for each drug). The low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole increased or tended to increase the heart rate, cardiac output and ventricular contraction, whereas the high dose plateaued and decreased them. Meanwhile, the low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole decreased the total peripheral vascular resistance, whereas the high dose plateaued and increased it. Rabeprazole decreased the mean blood pressure in a dose-related manner; moreover, its high dose decreased the heart rate and tended to reduce the ventricular contractility. On the other hand, omeprazole prolonged the QRS width. Omeprazole and lansoprazole tended to prolong the QT interval and QTcV, and rabeprazole mildly but significantly prolonged them in a dose-related manner. High dose of each PPI prolonged the ventricular effective refractory period. Omeprazole shortened the terminal repolarization period, whereas lansoprazole and rabeprazole hardly altered it. In effects, PPIs can exert multifarious cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological actions in vivo, including mild QT-interval prolongation; thus, PPIs should be given with caution to patients with reduced ventricular repolarization reserve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 7\",\"pages\":\"375-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.48.375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.48.375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床已知长期使用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)会诱发低镁血症,增加qt间期延长和致死性室性心律失常的风险,而PPIs在体外实验中可以直接调节心脏离子电流。为了填补这些信息之间的空白,我们用氟烷麻醉的狗(每种药物n = 6)评估了亚治疗剂量到超治疗剂量(0.05,0.5和5 mg/kg/10 min)的典型PPIs奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和雷贝拉唑的急性心肌动力学和电生理效应。低、中剂量奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑使心率、心输出量和心室收缩增加或趋于增加,而高剂量奥美拉唑使心率、心输出量和心室收缩趋于稳定并降低。同时,低、中剂量奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑降低了外周血管总阻力,而高剂量奥美拉唑使外周血管总阻力趋于稳定并升高。雷贝拉唑降低平均血压呈剂量相关性;此外,其高剂量降低心率,并有降低心室收缩力的倾向。另一方面,奥美拉唑延长了QRS宽度。奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑有延长QT间期和QTcV的倾向,雷贝拉唑有轻度但显著延长QT间期和QTcV的倾向,且呈剂量相关。各大剂量PPI均可延长心室有效不应期。奥美拉唑缩短了终末复极期,而兰索拉唑和雷贝拉唑几乎没有改变终末复极期。实际上,PPIs可以在体内发挥多种心血管动力学和电生理作用,包括轻度qt间期延长;因此,对于心室复极储备减少的患者应谨慎使用PPIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vivo analysis of acute eletropharmacological effects of proton pump inhibitors using halothane-anesthetized dogs: a translational study of cardiovascular adverse events.

Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is known to clinically induce hypomagnesemia, increasing the risk toward QT-interval prolongation and lethal ventricular arrhythmias, whereas PPIs can directly modulate cardiac ionic currents in the in vitro experiments. In order to fill the gap between those information, we assessed acute cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of sub- to supra-therapeutic doses (0.05, 0.5 and 5 mg/kg/10 min) of typical PPIs omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, using halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 6 for each drug). The low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole increased or tended to increase the heart rate, cardiac output and ventricular contraction, whereas the high dose plateaued and decreased them. Meanwhile, the low and middle doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole decreased the total peripheral vascular resistance, whereas the high dose plateaued and increased it. Rabeprazole decreased the mean blood pressure in a dose-related manner; moreover, its high dose decreased the heart rate and tended to reduce the ventricular contractility. On the other hand, omeprazole prolonged the QRS width. Omeprazole and lansoprazole tended to prolong the QT interval and QTcV, and rabeprazole mildly but significantly prolonged them in a dose-related manner. High dose of each PPI prolonged the ventricular effective refractory period. Omeprazole shortened the terminal repolarization period, whereas lansoprazole and rabeprazole hardly altered it. In effects, PPIs can exert multifarious cardiohemodynamic and electrophysiological actions in vivo, including mild QT-interval prolongation; thus, PPIs should be given with caution to patients with reduced ventricular repolarization reserve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) is a scientific journal that publishes research about the mechanisms and significance of the toxicity of substances, such as drugs, food additives, food contaminants and environmental pollutants. Papers on the toxicities and effects of extracts and mixtures containing unidentified compounds cannot be accepted as a general rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信