制定质量指标评价儿科患者经验性抗菌药物使用的适宜性。

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Holly MacKinnon, Kathryn Slayter, Jeannette L Comeau, Kathryn Timberlake, Michelle Science, Emily K Black
{"title":"制定质量指标评价儿科患者经验性抗菌药物使用的适宜性。","authors":"Holly MacKinnon,&nbsp;Kathryn Slayter,&nbsp;Jeannette L Comeau,&nbsp;Kathryn Timberlake,&nbsp;Michelle Science,&nbsp;Emily K Black","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of quality indicators is one strategy recommended to assess antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To achieve consensus from infectious diseases clinicians on quality indicators that characterize appropriate empiric antimicrobial use for the management of infectious syndromes in pediatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was completed using the Delphi technique. The research team developed an initial list of quality indicators, informed by a literature search. A multidisciplinary group of health care providers with expertise in infectious diseases was invited to participate. The list was disseminated to this panel of experts using Opinio survey software. The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a 9-point Likert scale in relation to the following criterion: \"The importance of each item in determining appropriateness considering benefit or harm at the individual or population level\". Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement and a median score of 7 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of 31 invited experts completed at least 1 round of the survey, and 10 completed all rounds. Consensus was achieved on 28 of 31 proposed indicators after 3 rounds. Indicators with consensus were categorized under \"empiric choice\" (<i>n</i> = 12 indicators), \"dose\" (<i>n</i> = 5), \"duration\" (<i>n</i> = 2), \"administration\" (<i>n</i> = 4), \"diagnosis\" (<i>n</i> = 2), and \"documentation\" (<i>n</i> = 3). Six of the indicators for which consensus was achieved were rephrased by the experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus was achieved on quality indicators to assess the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial use in pediatric patients. Clinicians and researchers can use these consensus-based indicators to assess adherence to best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"76 1","pages":"40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817230/pdf/cjhp-76-40.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Empiric Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Holly MacKinnon,&nbsp;Kathryn Slayter,&nbsp;Jeannette L Comeau,&nbsp;Kathryn Timberlake,&nbsp;Michelle Science,&nbsp;Emily K Black\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of quality indicators is one strategy recommended to assess antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To achieve consensus from infectious diseases clinicians on quality indicators that characterize appropriate empiric antimicrobial use for the management of infectious syndromes in pediatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was completed using the Delphi technique. The research team developed an initial list of quality indicators, informed by a literature search. A multidisciplinary group of health care providers with expertise in infectious diseases was invited to participate. The list was disseminated to this panel of experts using Opinio survey software. The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a 9-point Likert scale in relation to the following criterion: \\\"The importance of each item in determining appropriateness considering benefit or harm at the individual or population level\\\". Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement and a median score of 7 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of 31 invited experts completed at least 1 round of the survey, and 10 completed all rounds. Consensus was achieved on 28 of 31 proposed indicators after 3 rounds. Indicators with consensus were categorized under \\\"empiric choice\\\" (<i>n</i> = 12 indicators), \\\"dose\\\" (<i>n</i> = 5), \\\"duration\\\" (<i>n</i> = 2), \\\"administration\\\" (<i>n</i> = 4), \\\"diagnosis\\\" (<i>n</i> = 2), and \\\"documentation\\\" (<i>n</i> = 3). Six of the indicators for which consensus was achieved were rephrased by the experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus was achieved on quality indicators to assess the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial use in pediatric patients. Clinicians and researchers can use these consensus-based indicators to assess adherence to best practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"40-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9817230/pdf/cjhp-76-40.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用质量指标是评估儿科住院患者抗菌药物处方的一种推荐策略。目的:从传染病临床医生达成共识的质量指标,表征适当的经验性抗菌药物使用儿科住院患者感染综合征的管理。方法:采用德尔菲法进行研究。通过文献检索,研究小组制定了一份质量指标的初步清单。邀请了一个具有传染病专业知识的多学科保健提供者小组参加。该名单是通过Opinio调查软件分发给专家小组的。专家们被要求根据以下标准以9分的李克特量表对指标进行评分:“考虑到个人或群体层面的利益或危害,每个项目在确定适当性方面的重要性”。共识被定义为至少75%的同意和中位数得分为7或更高。结果:31位受邀专家中有12位至少完成了1轮调查,10位完成了全部调查。经过三轮谈判,31项拟议指标中的28项达成了协商一致意见。达成共识的指标分为“经验选择”(n = 12个指标)、“剂量”(n = 5)、“持续时间”(n = 2)、“给药”(n = 4)、“诊断”(n = 2)和“文件”(n = 3)。专家对达成共识的指标中有6个进行了重新表述。结论:在评估儿科患者经验性抗菌药物使用的适宜性的质量指标上取得了共识。临床医生和研究人员可以使用这些基于共识的指标来评估对最佳实践的遵守情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Empiric Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Patients.

Background: Use of quality indicators is one strategy recommended to assess antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric inpatients.

Objective: To achieve consensus from infectious diseases clinicians on quality indicators that characterize appropriate empiric antimicrobial use for the management of infectious syndromes in pediatric inpatients.

Methods: This study was completed using the Delphi technique. The research team developed an initial list of quality indicators, informed by a literature search. A multidisciplinary group of health care providers with expertise in infectious diseases was invited to participate. The list was disseminated to this panel of experts using Opinio survey software. The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a 9-point Likert scale in relation to the following criterion: "The importance of each item in determining appropriateness considering benefit or harm at the individual or population level". Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement and a median score of 7 or higher.

Results: Twelve of 31 invited experts completed at least 1 round of the survey, and 10 completed all rounds. Consensus was achieved on 28 of 31 proposed indicators after 3 rounds. Indicators with consensus were categorized under "empiric choice" (n = 12 indicators), "dose" (n = 5), "duration" (n = 2), "administration" (n = 4), "diagnosis" (n = 2), and "documentation" (n = 3). Six of the indicators for which consensus was achieved were rephrased by the experts.

Conclusions: Consensus was achieved on quality indicators to assess the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial use in pediatric patients. Clinicians and researchers can use these consensus-based indicators to assess adherence to best practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信