到2015年及以后的全球减贫:千年发展目标的影响是什么? 2015年后全球框架的选择是什么?

Andy Sumner, Meera Tiwari
{"title":"到2015年及以后的全球减贫:千年发展目标的影响是什么? 2015年后全球框架的选择是什么?","authors":"Andy Sumner,&nbsp;Meera Tiwari","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The purpose of this paper is to assess the policy impact of the MDGs and to begin to ask questions about any post-2015 global framework. The paper asks a series of questions and, in doing so, reviews the impact of the MDGs on policy and outcomes. The paper argues that the MDGs have had substantial but uneven policy impacts and post-2015 a more explicit and shared ownership of both South and North in any new deal is essential, as is attention to a changed world compared with that of the late 1990s. We outline three stylised options for a post-2015 framework in order to trigger further debate and propose that debate be led by a global commission.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2010 348","pages":"01-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Poverty Reduction to 2015 and Beyond: What has been the Impact of the MDGs and what are the Options for a Post-2015 Global Framework?\",\"authors\":\"Andy Sumner,&nbsp;Meera Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this paper is to assess the policy impact of the MDGs and to begin to ask questions about any post-2015 global framework. The paper asks a series of questions and, in doing so, reviews the impact of the MDGs on policy and outcomes. The paper argues that the MDGs have had substantial but uneven policy impacts and post-2015 a more explicit and shared ownership of both South and North in any new deal is essential, as is attention to a changed world compared with that of the late 1990s. We outline three stylised options for a post-2015 framework in order to trigger further debate and propose that debate be led by a global commission.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IDS Working Papers\",\"volume\":\"2010 348\",\"pages\":\"01-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IDS Working Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00348_2.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文的目的是评估千年发展目标的政策影响,并开始对任何2015年后的全球框架提出问题。该报告提出了一系列问题,并在此过程中回顾了千年发展目标对政策和成果的影响。该报告认为,千年发展目标产生了巨大但不平衡的政策影响,2015年后,在任何新协议中,更明确的南北双方共同所有权至关重要,关注与20世纪90年代末相比发生变化的世界也是至关重要的。我们概述了2015年后框架的三种风格选择,以引发进一步的辩论,并建议由一个全球委员会领导辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Poverty Reduction to 2015 and Beyond: What has been the Impact of the MDGs and what are the Options for a Post-2015 Global Framework?

The purpose of this paper is to assess the policy impact of the MDGs and to begin to ask questions about any post-2015 global framework. The paper asks a series of questions and, in doing so, reviews the impact of the MDGs on policy and outcomes. The paper argues that the MDGs have had substantial but uneven policy impacts and post-2015 a more explicit and shared ownership of both South and North in any new deal is essential, as is attention to a changed world compared with that of the late 1990s. We outline three stylised options for a post-2015 framework in order to trigger further debate and propose that debate be led by a global commission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信