Sally S E Park, Rohin Vij, Jeff Wu, Bryan Zarrin, Jee-Young Moon, Jason Oliveira, Jeffrey S Schultz, Anurag Shrivastava
{"title":"眼科急诊门诊门诊影响的系统分析。","authors":"Sally S E Park, Rohin Vij, Jeff Wu, Bryan Zarrin, Jee-Young Moon, Jason Oliveira, Jeffrey S Schultz, Anurag Shrivastava","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1741464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance</b> A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. <b>Objective</b> The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. <b>Design, Setting, and Participants</b> A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the \"TRIAGE\" group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the \"ED + TRIAGE\" group. <b>Main Outcomes and Measures</b> Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. <b>Results</b> Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the \"TRIAGE\" group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( <i>n</i> = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( <i>n</i> = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion <i>n</i> = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( <i>n</i> = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the \"TRIAGE\" group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the \"ED + TRIAGE\" group ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). The \"ED + TRIAGE\" group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( <i>n</i> = 42, 1.2%). <b>Conclusions and Relevance</b> A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e229-e237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/ab/10-1055-s-0041-1741464.PMC9927978.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Sally S E Park, Rohin Vij, Jeff Wu, Bryan Zarrin, Jee-Young Moon, Jason Oliveira, Jeffrey S Schultz, Anurag Shrivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1741464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Importance</b> A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. <b>Objective</b> The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. <b>Design, Setting, and Participants</b> A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the \\\"TRIAGE\\\" group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the \\\"ED + TRIAGE\\\" group. <b>Main Outcomes and Measures</b> Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. <b>Results</b> Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the \\\"TRIAGE\\\" group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( <i>n</i> = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( <i>n</i> = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion <i>n</i> = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( <i>n</i> = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the \\\"TRIAGE\\\" group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the \\\"ED + TRIAGE\\\" group ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). The \\\"ED + TRIAGE\\\" group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( <i>n</i> = 42, 1.2%). <b>Conclusions and Relevance</b> A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"e229-e237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/ab/10-1055-s-0041-1741464.PMC9927978.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
重要性当日眼科急诊门诊可以提供高效的眼科护理,丰富的教育环境,改善患者体验。目的:本研究的目的是系统地评估急诊新患者就诊的数量、财务影响、护理指标和病理广度。在2019年2月至2020年1月期间,我们在Montefiore医疗中心Henkind眼科研究所的同日分诊诊所对连续的紧急新患者评估进行了回顾性分析。直接到这家紧急护理诊所就诊的患者队列被称为“TRIAGE”组。最初出现在急诊科(ED),随后转到我们的分诊诊所的患者被称为“ED + triage”组。主要结果和措施访问评估了各种指标,包括诊断,持续时间,收费,成本和收入。此外,返回急诊科或住院住院记录。结果3482例就诊中,“TRIAGE”组2538例(72.9%)。常见的诊断为眼表疾病(n = 486, 19.1%)、外伤(n = 342, 13.5%;最常见的是表面磨损(195例,7.7%)和感染性结膜炎(304例,12.0%)。“TRIAGE”组患者平均比“ED + TRIAGE”组患者快184.6% (158.2 vs 450.2分钟)(p n = 42, 1.2%)。结论与意义当日眼科分诊门诊在提供高效护理的同时,也为住院医师提供了丰富的学习环境。通过直接获得专科护理,减少等待时间有助于提高质量、结果和满意度指标。
A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic.
Importance A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the "TRIAGE" group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the "ED + TRIAGE" group. Main Outcomes and Measures Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. Results Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the "TRIAGE" group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( n = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( n = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion n = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( n = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the "TRIAGE" group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the "ED + TRIAGE" group ( p < 0.001). The "ED + TRIAGE" group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( n = 42, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics.