增加眼脸整形外科多样性的已知障碍。

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2022-12-21 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758561
Johsias A Maru, Nicole D Carvajal, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes, Neeti Parikh, Davin C Ashraf, Robert C Kersten, Bryan J Winn, M Reza Vagefi, Seanna R Grob
{"title":"增加眼脸整形外科多样性的已知障碍。","authors":"Johsias A Maru, Nicole D Carvajal, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes, Neeti Parikh, Davin C Ashraf, Robert C Kersten, Bryan J Winn, M Reza Vagefi, Seanna R Grob","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Physician diversity is limited in ophthalmology and oculofacial plastic surgery. Determination of barriers within the application process for oculofacial plastic surgery may help target efforts to improve the recruitment of underrepresented groups. This study aimed to illuminate perceived barriers to increasing diversity in oculofacial plastic surgery trainees, according to the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellows and fellowship program directors (FPDs). <b>Methods</b>  During the month of February 2021, we sent surveys out to 54 current oculofacial plastic surgery fellows and 56 FPDs at 56 oculofacial plastic surgery programs recognized by the ASOPRS nationwide using a 15-question Qualtrics survey. <b>Results</b>  Sixty-three individuals (57%) responded to the survey: 34 fellows (63%) and 29 FPDs (52%). Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 68% of FPDs identified as non-underrepresented in medicine (UiM). Forty-four percent of fellows and 25% of FPDs identified as men. FPDs most commonly noted, \"Not enough minorities applying to our program\" and \"The objective data (Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program score, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step scores, clinical honors, Alpha Omega Alpha status, letter of recommendation) for minority applicants often do not meet the threshold required to offer an interview or to be ranked to match\" as barriers. Among fellows, the lowest-rated considerations when applying to oculofacial plastic surgery were \"Racially/ethnically diverse faculty\" and \"Perceptions of minority candidates by fellowship programs,\" whereas \"Likelihood of matching in program of choice\" was ranked highest in considerations. Fellows identifying as men indicated greater concern for \"Financial factors related to fellowship (e.g., loans, salary, cost of living, or cost of interviewing)\" compared to fellows identifying as women who noted greater concern for \"Program or preceptor acceptance of starting or having a family during fellowship.\" <b>Conclusion</b>  Responses from FPDs suggest that efforts focused on recruiting and supporting diverse students to medicine and ophthalmology, mentoring applicants interested in oculofacial plastic surgery, and restructuring the application process to decrease bias, may improve diversity within the subspecialty. The lack of UiM representation in this study, 6% fellows and 7.4% FPDs identified as UiM, shows both the stark underrepresentation and the need for further research into this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e271-e278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/82/10-1055-s-0042-1758561.PMC10302555.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Barriers to Increasing Diversity within Oculofacial Plastic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Johsias A Maru, Nicole D Carvajal, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes, Neeti Parikh, Davin C Ashraf, Robert C Kersten, Bryan J Winn, M Reza Vagefi, Seanna R Grob\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1758561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Physician diversity is limited in ophthalmology and oculofacial plastic surgery. Determination of barriers within the application process for oculofacial plastic surgery may help target efforts to improve the recruitment of underrepresented groups. This study aimed to illuminate perceived barriers to increasing diversity in oculofacial plastic surgery trainees, according to the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellows and fellowship program directors (FPDs). <b>Methods</b>  During the month of February 2021, we sent surveys out to 54 current oculofacial plastic surgery fellows and 56 FPDs at 56 oculofacial plastic surgery programs recognized by the ASOPRS nationwide using a 15-question Qualtrics survey. <b>Results</b>  Sixty-three individuals (57%) responded to the survey: 34 fellows (63%) and 29 FPDs (52%). Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 68% of FPDs identified as non-underrepresented in medicine (UiM). Forty-four percent of fellows and 25% of FPDs identified as men. FPDs most commonly noted, \\\"Not enough minorities applying to our program\\\" and \\\"The objective data (Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program score, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step scores, clinical honors, Alpha Omega Alpha status, letter of recommendation) for minority applicants often do not meet the threshold required to offer an interview or to be ranked to match\\\" as barriers. Among fellows, the lowest-rated considerations when applying to oculofacial plastic surgery were \\\"Racially/ethnically diverse faculty\\\" and \\\"Perceptions of minority candidates by fellowship programs,\\\" whereas \\\"Likelihood of matching in program of choice\\\" was ranked highest in considerations. Fellows identifying as men indicated greater concern for \\\"Financial factors related to fellowship (e.g., loans, salary, cost of living, or cost of interviewing)\\\" compared to fellows identifying as women who noted greater concern for \\\"Program or preceptor acceptance of starting or having a family during fellowship.\\\" <b>Conclusion</b>  Responses from FPDs suggest that efforts focused on recruiting and supporting diverse students to medicine and ophthalmology, mentoring applicants interested in oculofacial plastic surgery, and restructuring the application process to decrease bias, may improve diversity within the subspecialty. The lack of UiM representation in this study, 6% fellows and 7.4% FPDs identified as UiM, shows both the stark underrepresentation and the need for further research into this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"e271-e278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/82/10-1055-s-0042-1758561.PMC10302555.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 眼科和眼脸整形外科的医生多样性有限。确定眼脸整形外科申请过程中存在的障碍,有助于有针对性地改进对代表性不足群体的招聘工作。本研究旨在根据美国眼科整形外科学会(ASOPRS)研究员和奖学金项目主任(FPDs)的意见,阐明在提高眼脸整形外科受训人员多样性方面存在的障碍。方法 在 2021 年 2 月期间,我们使用 15 个问题的 Qualtrics 调查表向 54 名眼脸整形外科研究员和全国 56 个 ASOPRS 认可的眼脸整形外科项目的 56 名 FPD 发送了调查表。结果 63 人(57%)回复了调查:34名研究员(63%)和29名口腔颌面整形医生(52%)。88%的研究员和 68% 的 FPD 认为自己在医学界的代表性不足 (UiM)。44%的研究员和 25% 的 FPDs 认为自己是男性。FPD最常提到的障碍是 "没有足够的少数族裔申请我们的项目 "和 "少数族裔申请者的客观数据(眼科知识评估项目分数、美国医学执照考试阶梯分数、临床荣誉、Alpha Omega Alpha身份、推荐信)往往达不到面试或排名匹配所需的门槛"。在研究员中,申请眼脸整形外科时考虑最少的因素是 "种族/族裔多元化的教师 "和 "研究员项目对少数族裔候选人的看法",而 "与所选项目匹配的可能性 "在考虑因素中排名最高。与女性研究员相比,男性研究员更关注 "与研究金相关的财务因素(如贷款、工资、生活费用或面试费用)",而女性研究员则更关注 "项目或导师是否接受在研究金期间组建或拥有家庭"。结论 FPD 的答复表明,努力招募和支持不同的学生进入医学和眼科、指导对眼面整形外科感兴趣的申请人以及调整申请程序以减少偏见,可以改善该亚专科的多样性。在这项研究中,只有 6% 的研究员和 7.4% 的 FPD 被认定为 UiM,这表明 UiM 的代表性明显不足,需要对这一主题进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Barriers to Increasing Diversity within Oculofacial Plastic Surgery.

Purpose  Physician diversity is limited in ophthalmology and oculofacial plastic surgery. Determination of barriers within the application process for oculofacial plastic surgery may help target efforts to improve the recruitment of underrepresented groups. This study aimed to illuminate perceived barriers to increasing diversity in oculofacial plastic surgery trainees, according to the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) fellows and fellowship program directors (FPDs). Methods  During the month of February 2021, we sent surveys out to 54 current oculofacial plastic surgery fellows and 56 FPDs at 56 oculofacial plastic surgery programs recognized by the ASOPRS nationwide using a 15-question Qualtrics survey. Results  Sixty-three individuals (57%) responded to the survey: 34 fellows (63%) and 29 FPDs (52%). Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 68% of FPDs identified as non-underrepresented in medicine (UiM). Forty-four percent of fellows and 25% of FPDs identified as men. FPDs most commonly noted, "Not enough minorities applying to our program" and "The objective data (Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program score, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step scores, clinical honors, Alpha Omega Alpha status, letter of recommendation) for minority applicants often do not meet the threshold required to offer an interview or to be ranked to match" as barriers. Among fellows, the lowest-rated considerations when applying to oculofacial plastic surgery were "Racially/ethnically diverse faculty" and "Perceptions of minority candidates by fellowship programs," whereas "Likelihood of matching in program of choice" was ranked highest in considerations. Fellows identifying as men indicated greater concern for "Financial factors related to fellowship (e.g., loans, salary, cost of living, or cost of interviewing)" compared to fellows identifying as women who noted greater concern for "Program or preceptor acceptance of starting or having a family during fellowship." Conclusion  Responses from FPDs suggest that efforts focused on recruiting and supporting diverse students to medicine and ophthalmology, mentoring applicants interested in oculofacial plastic surgery, and restructuring the application process to decrease bias, may improve diversity within the subspecialty. The lack of UiM representation in this study, 6% fellows and 7.4% FPDs identified as UiM, shows both the stark underrepresentation and the need for further research into this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信