IDH野生型低级别胶质瘤伴胶质母细胞瘤分子特征:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Satoshi Nakasu, Shoichi Deguchi, Yoko Nakasu
{"title":"IDH野生型低级别胶质瘤伴胶质母细胞瘤分子特征:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Satoshi Nakasu,&nbsp;Shoichi Deguchi,&nbsp;Yoko Nakasu","doi":"10.1007/s10014-023-00463-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO 2021 classification defines IDH wild type (IDHw) histologically lower-grade glioma (hLGG) as molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) if TERT promoter mutation (pTERTm), EGFR amplification or chromosome seven gain and ten loss aberrations are indicated. We systematically reviewed articles of IDHw hLGGs studies (49 studies, N = 3748) and meta-analyzed mGBM prevalence and overall survival (OS) according to the PRISMA statement. mGBM rates in IDHw hLGG were significantly lower in Asian regions (43.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI: 35.8-52.0]) when compared to non-Asian regions (65.0%, [CI: 52.9-75.4]) (P = 0.005) and were significantly lower in fresh-frozen specimen when compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (P = 0.015). IDHw hLGGs without pTERTm rarely expressed other molecular markers in Asian studies when compared to non-Asian studies. Patients with mGBM had significantly longer OS times when compared to histological GBM (hGBM) (pooled hazard ratio (pHR) 0.824, [CI: 0.694-0.98], P = 0.03)). In patients with mGBM, histological grade was a significant prognostic factor (pHR 1.633, [CI: 1.09-2.447], P = 0.018), as was age (P = 0.001) and surgical extent (P = 0.018). Although bias risk across studies was moderate, mGBM with grade II histology showed better OS rates when compared to hGBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9226,"journal":{"name":"Brain Tumor Pathology","volume":"40 3","pages":"143-157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas with glioblastoma molecular features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Nakasu,&nbsp;Shoichi Deguchi,&nbsp;Yoko Nakasu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10014-023-00463-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The WHO 2021 classification defines IDH wild type (IDHw) histologically lower-grade glioma (hLGG) as molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) if TERT promoter mutation (pTERTm), EGFR amplification or chromosome seven gain and ten loss aberrations are indicated. We systematically reviewed articles of IDHw hLGGs studies (49 studies, N = 3748) and meta-analyzed mGBM prevalence and overall survival (OS) according to the PRISMA statement. mGBM rates in IDHw hLGG were significantly lower in Asian regions (43.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI: 35.8-52.0]) when compared to non-Asian regions (65.0%, [CI: 52.9-75.4]) (P = 0.005) and were significantly lower in fresh-frozen specimen when compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (P = 0.015). IDHw hLGGs without pTERTm rarely expressed other molecular markers in Asian studies when compared to non-Asian studies. Patients with mGBM had significantly longer OS times when compared to histological GBM (hGBM) (pooled hazard ratio (pHR) 0.824, [CI: 0.694-0.98], P = 0.03)). In patients with mGBM, histological grade was a significant prognostic factor (pHR 1.633, [CI: 1.09-2.447], P = 0.018), as was age (P = 0.001) and surgical extent (P = 0.018). Although bias risk across studies was moderate, mGBM with grade II histology showed better OS rates when compared to hGBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Tumor Pathology\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"143-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Tumor Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-023-00463-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Tumor Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-023-00463-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

WHO 2021分类将IDH野生型(IDHw)组织学级别较低的胶质瘤(hLGG)定义为分子胶质母细胞瘤(mGBM),如果有TERT启动子突变(pTERTm)、EGFR扩增或7号染色体获得和10号染色体丢失畸变。我们系统地回顾了IDHw hLGGs研究的文章(49项研究,N = 3748),并根据PRISMA声明对mGBM患病率和总生存率(OS)进行了meta分析。与非亚洲地区(65.0%,[CI: 52.9-75.4])相比,亚洲地区IDHw hLGG的mGBM率(43.7%,95%可信区间[CI: 35.8-52.0])显著低于亚洲地区(65.0%,[CI: 52.9-75.4]) (P = 0.005),新鲜冷冻标本与福尔马林固定石蜡包埋标本相比显著低于(P = 0.015)。与非亚洲研究相比,没有pTERTm的IDHw hLGGs在亚洲研究中很少表达其他分子标记。与组织学GBM (hGBM)相比,mGBM患者的OS时间明显更长(合并风险比(pHR) 0.824, [CI: 0.694-0.98], P = 0.03)。在mGBM患者中,组织学分级是影响预后的重要因素(pHR为1.633,[CI: 1.09-2.447], P = 0.018),年龄(P = 0.001)和手术范围(P = 0.018)也是影响预后的重要因素。虽然各研究的偏倚风险中等,但与hGBM相比,组织学为II级的mGBM表现出更好的OS率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas with glioblastoma molecular features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas with glioblastoma molecular features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The WHO 2021 classification defines IDH wild type (IDHw) histologically lower-grade glioma (hLGG) as molecular glioblastoma (mGBM) if TERT promoter mutation (pTERTm), EGFR amplification or chromosome seven gain and ten loss aberrations are indicated. We systematically reviewed articles of IDHw hLGGs studies (49 studies, N = 3748) and meta-analyzed mGBM prevalence and overall survival (OS) according to the PRISMA statement. mGBM rates in IDHw hLGG were significantly lower in Asian regions (43.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI: 35.8-52.0]) when compared to non-Asian regions (65.0%, [CI: 52.9-75.4]) (P = 0.005) and were significantly lower in fresh-frozen specimen when compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (P = 0.015). IDHw hLGGs without pTERTm rarely expressed other molecular markers in Asian studies when compared to non-Asian studies. Patients with mGBM had significantly longer OS times when compared to histological GBM (hGBM) (pooled hazard ratio (pHR) 0.824, [CI: 0.694-0.98], P = 0.03)). In patients with mGBM, histological grade was a significant prognostic factor (pHR 1.633, [CI: 1.09-2.447], P = 0.018), as was age (P = 0.001) and surgical extent (P = 0.018). Although bias risk across studies was moderate, mGBM with grade II histology showed better OS rates when compared to hGBM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Tumor Pathology
Brain Tumor Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Tumor Pathology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. This international journal documents the latest research and topical debate in all clinical and experimental fields relating to brain tumors, especially brain tumor pathology. The journal has been published since 1983 and has been recognized worldwide as a unique journal of high quality. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, rapid short communications, instructional lectures, review articles, letters to the editor, and topics.Review articles and Topics may be recommended at the annual meeting of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. All contributions should be aimed at promoting international scientific collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信