建立一个基础设施和标准的方法,积极参与病人提前护理计划。

Q1 Nursing
Karen Stepan, Lara Bashoura, Marina George, Wendy Griffith, Margaret Meyer, Nico Nortjé, Kristen Price, Donna S Zhukovsky, Maria Alma Rodriguez
{"title":"建立一个基础设施和标准的方法,积极参与病人提前护理计划。","authors":"Karen Stepan,&nbsp;Lara Bashoura,&nbsp;Marina George,&nbsp;Wendy Griffith,&nbsp;Margaret Meyer,&nbsp;Nico Nortjé,&nbsp;Kristen Price,&nbsp;Donna S Zhukovsky,&nbsp;Maria Alma Rodriguez","doi":"10.1200/JOP.18.00406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With little to no infrastructure or standardized methodology in place to actively engage patients in advance care planning (ACP), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center set out to identify needed resources, develop an intervention to improve ACP, and evaluate the intervention's effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With the support of executive leadership, a multidisciplinary workgroup enlisted the support of ACP champions, performed a root-cause analysis, developed a detailed ACP process flow by provider role, developed patient and family education resources, and developed faculty and staff training materials. The workgroup also implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention cycles, which identified difficulty using the ACP note function in our electronic health record (EHR) as a barrier to ACP adoption. By educating patients, families, and providers and improving the EHR's functionality, the workgroup aimed to increase the percentage of ambulatory patients with a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer who had a documented ACP conversation with a provider by their third office visit. Our goal was to improve this percentage from 20% at baseline to 50% after the intervention. Data were obtained from our institution's EHRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients who had documented ACP conversations increased from 20% at baseline to 34% at the end of fiscal year 2017 and 54% at the end of fiscal year 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Owing to the dedicated efforts of many individuals across the institution, the postintervention goal was surpassed. Additional efforts to facilitate ACP conversations are ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"15 12","pages":"e1085-e1091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JOP.18.00406","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building an Infrastructure and Standard Methodology for Actively Engaging Patients in Advance Care Planning.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Stepan,&nbsp;Lara Bashoura,&nbsp;Marina George,&nbsp;Wendy Griffith,&nbsp;Margaret Meyer,&nbsp;Nico Nortjé,&nbsp;Kristen Price,&nbsp;Donna S Zhukovsky,&nbsp;Maria Alma Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JOP.18.00406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With little to no infrastructure or standardized methodology in place to actively engage patients in advance care planning (ACP), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center set out to identify needed resources, develop an intervention to improve ACP, and evaluate the intervention's effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With the support of executive leadership, a multidisciplinary workgroup enlisted the support of ACP champions, performed a root-cause analysis, developed a detailed ACP process flow by provider role, developed patient and family education resources, and developed faculty and staff training materials. The workgroup also implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention cycles, which identified difficulty using the ACP note function in our electronic health record (EHR) as a barrier to ACP adoption. By educating patients, families, and providers and improving the EHR's functionality, the workgroup aimed to increase the percentage of ambulatory patients with a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer who had a documented ACP conversation with a provider by their third office visit. Our goal was to improve this percentage from 20% at baseline to 50% after the intervention. Data were obtained from our institution's EHRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients who had documented ACP conversations increased from 20% at baseline to 34% at the end of fiscal year 2017 and 54% at the end of fiscal year 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Owing to the dedicated efforts of many individuals across the institution, the postintervention goal was surpassed. Additional efforts to facilitate ACP conversations are ongoing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"e1085-e1091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JOP.18.00406\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:由于几乎没有基础设施或标准化的方法来积极参与患者的预先护理计划(ACP),德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心开始确定所需的资源,开发一种改善ACP的干预措施,并评估干预措施的效果。方法:在行政领导的支持下,一个多学科工作组获得了ACP倡导者的支持,进行了根本原因分析,根据提供者角色制定了详细的ACP流程,开发了患者和家庭教育资源,并开发了教职员工培训材料。工作组还实施了两个计划-执行-研究-行动干预周期,发现在我们的电子健康记录(EHR)中难以使用ACP笔记功能是采用ACP的障碍。通过对患者、家属和医疗服务提供者进行教育,并改进电子病历的功能,工作组旨在提高诊断为晚期或转移性癌症的门诊患者在第三次就诊时与医疗服务提供者进行ACP记录对话的比例。我们的目标是将这一比例从基线时的20%提高到干预后的50%。数据来自我们机构的电子病历。结果:记录ACP对话的患者比例从基线时的20%增加到2017财年末的34%和2018财年末的54%。结论:由于整个机构中许多人的努力,干预后的目标被超越了。正在进一步努力促进非加太对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building an Infrastructure and Standard Methodology for Actively Engaging Patients in Advance Care Planning.

Purpose: With little to no infrastructure or standardized methodology in place to actively engage patients in advance care planning (ACP), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center set out to identify needed resources, develop an intervention to improve ACP, and evaluate the intervention's effects.

Methods: With the support of executive leadership, a multidisciplinary workgroup enlisted the support of ACP champions, performed a root-cause analysis, developed a detailed ACP process flow by provider role, developed patient and family education resources, and developed faculty and staff training materials. The workgroup also implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act intervention cycles, which identified difficulty using the ACP note function in our electronic health record (EHR) as a barrier to ACP adoption. By educating patients, families, and providers and improving the EHR's functionality, the workgroup aimed to increase the percentage of ambulatory patients with a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer who had a documented ACP conversation with a provider by their third office visit. Our goal was to improve this percentage from 20% at baseline to 50% after the intervention. Data were obtained from our institution's EHRs.

Results: The percentage of patients who had documented ACP conversations increased from 20% at baseline to 34% at the end of fiscal year 2017 and 54% at the end of fiscal year 2018.

Conclusion: Owing to the dedicated efforts of many individuals across the institution, the postintervention goal was surpassed. Additional efforts to facilitate ACP conversations are ongoing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信