腰椎管狭窄症临床实践指南要点,2021:4。外科处置

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Gen Inoue
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄症临床实践指南要点,2021:4。外科处置","authors":"Gen Inoue","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"・Surgical procedures should be selected with patient consent based on comprehensive evaluations, including short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, risk of complications, and cost-effectiveness. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative treatments are less effective or severe neurological symptoms in the cauda equina, such as bladder and bowel dysfunction, are noted. ・Several reports have indicated that decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) produces better clinical outcomes than conservative treatment. It is suggested to perform decompression for patients with LSS without spinal segmental instability diagnosed by physical findings and imaging, in whom conservative treatment is ineffective. ・While decompression with fusion is useful for patients with spinal instability and the improvement of Quality of Life (QOL)/Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is expected, the cost is higher than that of decompression alone, and the return-to-work rate is slightly poorer. The rates of complications and reoperation are also higher than those of decompression alone. So, fully considering pathological conditions and surgical procedures to examine indications is necessary, such as instability and the need for long-segment fusion. ・The bone union state may affect clinical outcomes, but a clear recommendation cannot currently be presented. ・It is suggested to use local bone and to combine the use of artificial bone, demineralized bone matrix, and allogenic bone as the bone graft material for spinal fusion. ・A clear recommendation cannot be made as to whether surgical treatment using Interspinous Process Devices (IPDs) or dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws is more useful than conservative treatment, decompression, or fusion surgery for LSS. ・For patients with LSS, minimally invasive spine surgery may be more useful for preventing the occurrence of iatrogenic instability, alleviating low back pain, and reducing the bleeding volume than conventional surgery, and it is suggested to perform it. ・Even in the very elderly aged 80 years (octagenarian and over), surgical treatment for LSS improves their clinical symptoms.","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"7 4","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/06/2432-261X-7-0308.PMC10447186.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 4. Surgical Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Gen Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"・Surgical procedures should be selected with patient consent based on comprehensive evaluations, including short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, risk of complications, and cost-effectiveness. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative treatments are less effective or severe neurological symptoms in the cauda equina, such as bladder and bowel dysfunction, are noted. ・Several reports have indicated that decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) produces better clinical outcomes than conservative treatment. It is suggested to perform decompression for patients with LSS without spinal segmental instability diagnosed by physical findings and imaging, in whom conservative treatment is ineffective. ・While decompression with fusion is useful for patients with spinal instability and the improvement of Quality of Life (QOL)/Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is expected, the cost is higher than that of decompression alone, and the return-to-work rate is slightly poorer. The rates of complications and reoperation are also higher than those of decompression alone. So, fully considering pathological conditions and surgical procedures to examine indications is necessary, such as instability and the need for long-segment fusion. ・The bone union state may affect clinical outcomes, but a clear recommendation cannot currently be presented. ・It is suggested to use local bone and to combine the use of artificial bone, demineralized bone matrix, and allogenic bone as the bone graft material for spinal fusion. ・A clear recommendation cannot be made as to whether surgical treatment using Interspinous Process Devices (IPDs) or dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws is more useful than conservative treatment, decompression, or fusion surgery for LSS. ・For patients with LSS, minimally invasive spine surgery may be more useful for preventing the occurrence of iatrogenic instability, alleviating low back pain, and reducing the bleeding volume than conventional surgery, and it is suggested to perform it. ・Even in the very elderly aged 80 years (octagenarian and over), surgical treatment for LSS improves their clinical symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"308-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/06/2432-261X-7-0308.PMC10447186.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 4. Surgical Treatment.
・Surgical procedures should be selected with patient consent based on comprehensive evaluations, including short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, risk of complications, and cost-effectiveness. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative treatments are less effective or severe neurological symptoms in the cauda equina, such as bladder and bowel dysfunction, are noted. ・Several reports have indicated that decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) produces better clinical outcomes than conservative treatment. It is suggested to perform decompression for patients with LSS without spinal segmental instability diagnosed by physical findings and imaging, in whom conservative treatment is ineffective. ・While decompression with fusion is useful for patients with spinal instability and the improvement of Quality of Life (QOL)/Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is expected, the cost is higher than that of decompression alone, and the return-to-work rate is slightly poorer. The rates of complications and reoperation are also higher than those of decompression alone. So, fully considering pathological conditions and surgical procedures to examine indications is necessary, such as instability and the need for long-segment fusion. ・The bone union state may affect clinical outcomes, but a clear recommendation cannot currently be presented. ・It is suggested to use local bone and to combine the use of artificial bone, demineralized bone matrix, and allogenic bone as the bone graft material for spinal fusion. ・A clear recommendation cannot be made as to whether surgical treatment using Interspinous Process Devices (IPDs) or dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws is more useful than conservative treatment, decompression, or fusion surgery for LSS. ・For patients with LSS, minimally invasive spine surgery may be more useful for preventing the occurrence of iatrogenic instability, alleviating low back pain, and reducing the bleeding volume than conventional surgery, and it is suggested to perform it. ・Even in the very elderly aged 80 years (octagenarian and over), surgical treatment for LSS improves their clinical symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信