Sara Zand, Hakimeh Sadeghian, Ali Kazemisaid, Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany, Arash Jalali, Akram Sardari
{"title":"心肌病右束支传导阻滞患者对心脏再同步化治疗的反应。","authors":"Sara Zand, Hakimeh Sadeghian, Ali Kazemisaid, Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany, Arash Jalali, Akram Sardari","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v18i2.13320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is under debate. We present early and late echocardiographic characteristics of a series of heart failure patients with RBBB who underwent CRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective descriptive study, 18 patients with RBBB in the surface electrocardiogram underwent CRT between 2005 and 2015. All the patients had the New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and a QRS duration ≥120 milliseconds. The median follow-up duration was 19 months. The echocardiographic response was based on a ≥5% increase in LVEF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 48 hours after CRT implantation, LVEF increased from 24.58%±7.08% before to 28.46±8.91% after CRT (P=0.005) and to 30.00±9.44% at follow-up (P=0.008). Among the 18 patients, 12 (66.7%) were responders within 48 hours after CRT. The following baseline echocardiographic parameters were higher in the responders than in those without an increased LVEF, although the difference did not reach statistical significance: septal-to-lateral wall delay (48.33±33.53 vs 43.33±38.82 ms), anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay (41.7±1.75 vs 38.33±18.35 ms), and interventricular mechanical delay (48.50±21.13 vs 31.17±19.93 ms). The mean QRS duration was higher in the responders than in the non-responders (183.58±40.69 vs 169.00±27.36 ms). Death was reported in 3 out of the 18 patients (16.7%) at follow-up. The 3 deceased patients had a higher baseline interventricular mechanical delay than those who survived.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that patients with RBBB might benefit from CRT. Further, patients with higher intra and interventricular dyssynchrony and a wider QRS may show better responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"18 2","pages":"109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/e6/JTHC-18-109.PMC10459338.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Zand, Hakimeh Sadeghian, Ali Kazemisaid, Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany, Arash Jalali, Akram Sardari\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jthc.v18i2.13320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is under debate. We present early and late echocardiographic characteristics of a series of heart failure patients with RBBB who underwent CRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective descriptive study, 18 patients with RBBB in the surface electrocardiogram underwent CRT between 2005 and 2015. All the patients had the New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and a QRS duration ≥120 milliseconds. The median follow-up duration was 19 months. The echocardiographic response was based on a ≥5% increase in LVEF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 48 hours after CRT implantation, LVEF increased from 24.58%±7.08% before to 28.46±8.91% after CRT (P=0.005) and to 30.00±9.44% at follow-up (P=0.008). Among the 18 patients, 12 (66.7%) were responders within 48 hours after CRT. The following baseline echocardiographic parameters were higher in the responders than in those without an increased LVEF, although the difference did not reach statistical significance: septal-to-lateral wall delay (48.33±33.53 vs 43.33±38.82 ms), anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay (41.7±1.75 vs 38.33±18.35 ms), and interventricular mechanical delay (48.50±21.13 vs 31.17±19.93 ms). The mean QRS duration was higher in the responders than in the non-responders (183.58±40.69 vs 169.00±27.36 ms). Death was reported in 3 out of the 18 patients (16.7%) at follow-up. The 3 deceased patients had a higher baseline interventricular mechanical delay than those who survived.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that patients with RBBB might benefit from CRT. Further, patients with higher intra and interventricular dyssynchrony and a wider QRS may show better responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"109-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/e6/JTHC-18-109.PMC10459338.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v18i2.13320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v18i2.13320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)在右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)心衰患者中的应用一直存在争议。我们报告了一系列接受CRT治疗的RBBB心衰患者的早期和晚期超声心动图特征。方法:回顾性描述性研究,对2005 - 2015年间18例体表心电图RBBB患者行CRT治疗。所有患者的纽约心脏协会功能分级为III/IV级,左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%,QRS持续时间≥120毫秒。中位随访时间为19个月。超声心动图反应是基于LVEF增加≥5%。结果:CRT植入后48 h内,LVEF由植入前的24.58%±7.08%上升至植入后的28.46±8.91% (P=0.005),随访时上升至30.00±9.44% (P=0.008)。18例患者中,12例(66.7%)在CRT后48小时内出现应答。应答者的以下基线超声心动图参数高于无LVEF增高者,但差异无统计学意义:室间隔至外侧壁延迟(48.33±33.53 vs 43.33±38.82 ms)、前间隔至后壁延迟(41.7±1.75 vs 38.33±18.35 ms)和室间隔机械延迟(48.50±21.13 vs 31.17±19.93 ms)。应答者的QRS平均持续时间(183.58±40.69 ms)高于无应答者(169.00±27.36 ms)。随访时,18例患者中有3例(16.7%)死亡。3例死亡患者的基线室间性机械延迟高于存活患者。结论:我们的研究结果表明,RBBB患者可能受益于CRT。此外,较高的室内和室间非同步化和较宽的QRS可能表现出更好的反应。
Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block.
Background: The use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is under debate. We present early and late echocardiographic characteristics of a series of heart failure patients with RBBB who underwent CRT.
Methods: In this retrospective descriptive study, 18 patients with RBBB in the surface electrocardiogram underwent CRT between 2005 and 2015. All the patients had the New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and a QRS duration ≥120 milliseconds. The median follow-up duration was 19 months. The echocardiographic response was based on a ≥5% increase in LVEF.
Results: Within 48 hours after CRT implantation, LVEF increased from 24.58%±7.08% before to 28.46±8.91% after CRT (P=0.005) and to 30.00±9.44% at follow-up (P=0.008). Among the 18 patients, 12 (66.7%) were responders within 48 hours after CRT. The following baseline echocardiographic parameters were higher in the responders than in those without an increased LVEF, although the difference did not reach statistical significance: septal-to-lateral wall delay (48.33±33.53 vs 43.33±38.82 ms), anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay (41.7±1.75 vs 38.33±18.35 ms), and interventricular mechanical delay (48.50±21.13 vs 31.17±19.93 ms). The mean QRS duration was higher in the responders than in the non-responders (183.58±40.69 vs 169.00±27.36 ms). Death was reported in 3 out of the 18 patients (16.7%) at follow-up. The 3 deceased patients had a higher baseline interventricular mechanical delay than those who survived.
Conclusion: Our results indicated that patients with RBBB might benefit from CRT. Further, patients with higher intra and interventricular dyssynchrony and a wider QRS may show better responses.