传达私人水井饮用水检测结果:设计有助于理解的报告反馈材料。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Health Pub Date : 2023-04-01
Sarah Yelton, Andrew George, Martha Scott Tomlinson, Paige A Bommarito, Rebecca C Fry, Kathleen M Gray
{"title":"传达私人水井饮用水检测结果:设计有助于理解的报告反馈材料。","authors":"Sarah Yelton, Andrew George, Martha Scott Tomlinson, Paige A Bommarito, Rebecca C Fry, Kathleen M Gray","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of graphic-based (i.e., pictorial) report-back materials in communicating the presence of toxic metals in private well water and soil samples. It also explored associations between recommendations in the report-back materials and appropriate actions to protect health taken by a subset of participants in an environmental monitoring pilot study. Overall, 39 residents of Stokes County, North Carolina, participated in the Well Empowered pilot study, which included water and soil testing and analysis. All participants received materials explaining the extent to which toxic metals were present in their well water and soil. A subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 14) responded to a follow-up evaluation, which showed that many found at least one component of their test results \"very easy to understand.\" The existence of a federal standard for comparison appeared to influence participant recall of results, which was more accurate for contaminants with a federal maximum contaminant level. Our evaluation results suggest that a simple pictorial format, in combination with more detailed supporting text, can be useful in highlighting results that require action.</p>","PeriodicalId":15713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health","volume":"85 8","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448603/pdf/nihms-1916354.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating Results of Drinking Water Tests From Private Wells: Designing Report-Back Materials to Facilitate Understanding.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Yelton, Andrew George, Martha Scott Tomlinson, Paige A Bommarito, Rebecca C Fry, Kathleen M Gray\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of graphic-based (i.e., pictorial) report-back materials in communicating the presence of toxic metals in private well water and soil samples. It also explored associations between recommendations in the report-back materials and appropriate actions to protect health taken by a subset of participants in an environmental monitoring pilot study. Overall, 39 residents of Stokes County, North Carolina, participated in the Well Empowered pilot study, which included water and soil testing and analysis. All participants received materials explaining the extent to which toxic metals were present in their well water and soil. A subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 14) responded to a follow-up evaluation, which showed that many found at least one component of their test results \\\"very easy to understand.\\\" The existence of a federal standard for comparison appeared to influence participant recall of results, which was more accurate for contaminants with a federal maximum contaminant level. Our evaluation results suggest that a simple pictorial format, in combination with more detailed supporting text, can be useful in highlighting results that require action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\"85 8\",\"pages\":\"8-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448603/pdf/nihms-1916354.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本评估评估了基于图形(即图片)的反馈报告材料在通报私人井水和土壤样本中有毒金属存在情况方面的有效性。评估还探讨了反馈报告材料中的建议与环境监测试点研究中部分参与者为保护健康而采取的适当行动之间的关联。北卡罗来纳州斯托克斯县共有 39 名居民参加了 "水井赋权 "试点研究,其中包括水和土壤的检测和分析。所有参与者都收到了解释其井水和土壤中有毒金属含量的材料。一部分参与者(n = 14)对后续评估做出了回应,评估结果显示,许多人认为他们的检测结果中至少有一项内容 "非常容易理解"。用于比较的联邦标准的存在似乎影响了参与者对结果的回忆,对于具有联邦最高污染物水平的污染物,回忆结果更为准确。我们的评估结果表明,简单的图片格式与更详细的辅助文字相结合,有助于突出需要采取行动的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicating Results of Drinking Water Tests From Private Wells: Designing Report-Back Materials to Facilitate Understanding.

This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of graphic-based (i.e., pictorial) report-back materials in communicating the presence of toxic metals in private well water and soil samples. It also explored associations between recommendations in the report-back materials and appropriate actions to protect health taken by a subset of participants in an environmental monitoring pilot study. Overall, 39 residents of Stokes County, North Carolina, participated in the Well Empowered pilot study, which included water and soil testing and analysis. All participants received materials explaining the extent to which toxic metals were present in their well water and soil. A subset of participants (n = 14) responded to a follow-up evaluation, which showed that many found at least one component of their test results "very easy to understand." The existence of a federal standard for comparison appeared to influence participant recall of results, which was more accurate for contaminants with a federal maximum contaminant level. Our evaluation results suggest that a simple pictorial format, in combination with more detailed supporting text, can be useful in highlighting results that require action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health
Journal of Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Health (JEH) is published 10 times per year by the National Environmental Health Association and keeps readers up-to-date on current issues, new research, useful products and services, and employment opportunities. As the only direct link to the complete spectrum of environmental health topics, the JEH reaches more than 20,000 professionals working to solve problems in areas such as air quality, drinking water, food safety and protection, hazardous materials/toxic substances management, institutional environmental health, occupational safety and health, terrorism and all-hazards preparedness, vector control, wastewater management, and water pollution control/water quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信