{"title":"用于头颈部肿瘤定量和形态学评估的合成 MRI:初步研究。","authors":"Zanxia Zhang, Shujian Li, Weijian Wang, Yong Zhang, Kaiyu Wang, Jingliang Cheng, Baohong Wen","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of synthetic MRI for quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors and compare the results with the conventional MRI approach.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A total of 92 patients with different head and neck tumor histology who underwent conventional and synthetic MRI were retrospectively recruited. The quantitative T1, T2, proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of 38 benign and 54 malignant tumors were measured and compared. Diagnostic efficacy for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination index. The image quality of conventional and synthetic <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W/<i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images on a 5-level Likert scale was also compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T1, T2 and ADC values of malignant head and neck tumors were smaller than those of benign tumors (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). T2 and ADC values showed better diagnostic efficacy than T1 for distinguishing malignant tumors from benign tumors (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). Adding the T2 value to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.839 to 0.886, with an integrated discrimination index of 4.28% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In terms of overall image quality, synthetic <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images were comparable to conventional <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images, while synthetic <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W images were inferior to conventional <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic MRI can facilitate the characterization of head and neck tumors by providing quantitative relaxation parameters and synthetic <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images. T2 values added to ADC values may further improve the differentiation of tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic MRI for the quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors: a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Zanxia Zhang, Shujian Li, Weijian Wang, Yong Zhang, Kaiyu Wang, Jingliang Cheng, Baohong Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/dmfr.20230103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of synthetic MRI for quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors and compare the results with the conventional MRI approach.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A total of 92 patients with different head and neck tumor histology who underwent conventional and synthetic MRI were retrospectively recruited. The quantitative T1, T2, proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of 38 benign and 54 malignant tumors were measured and compared. Diagnostic efficacy for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination index. The image quality of conventional and synthetic <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W/<i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images on a 5-level Likert scale was also compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T1, T2 and ADC values of malignant head and neck tumors were smaller than those of benign tumors (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). T2 and ADC values showed better diagnostic efficacy than T1 for distinguishing malignant tumors from benign tumors (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). Adding the T2 value to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.839 to 0.886, with an integrated discrimination index of 4.28% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In terms of overall image quality, synthetic <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images were comparable to conventional <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images, while synthetic <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W images were inferior to conventional <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>W images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic MRI can facilitate the characterization of head and neck tumors by providing quantitative relaxation parameters and synthetic <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>W images. T2 values added to ADC values may further improve the differentiation of tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synthetic MRI for the quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors: a preliminary study.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of synthetic MRI for quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors and compare the results with the conventional MRI approach.
Methods and materials: A total of 92 patients with different head and neck tumor histology who underwent conventional and synthetic MRI were retrospectively recruited. The quantitative T1, T2, proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of 38 benign and 54 malignant tumors were measured and compared. Diagnostic efficacy for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination index. The image quality of conventional and synthetic T1W/T2W images on a 5-level Likert scale was also compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results: T1, T2 and ADC values of malignant head and neck tumors were smaller than those of benign tumors (all p < 0.05). T2 and ADC values showed better diagnostic efficacy than T1 for distinguishing malignant tumors from benign tumors (both p < 0.05). Adding the T2 value to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.839 to 0.886, with an integrated discrimination index of 4.28% (p < 0.05). In terms of overall image quality, synthetic T2W images were comparable to conventional T2W images, while synthetic T1W images were inferior to conventional T1W images.
Conclusions: Synthetic MRI can facilitate the characterization of head and neck tumors by providing quantitative relaxation parameters and synthetic T2W images. T2 values added to ADC values may further improve the differentiation of tumors.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X