在冠状病毒大流行期间恢复国家麻醉学模拟计划。

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2021-06-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000894
Sinead Campbell, Sarah Corbett, Crina L Burlacu
{"title":"在冠状病毒大流行期间恢复国家麻醉学模拟计划。","authors":"Sinead Campbell, Sarah Corbett, Crina L Burlacu","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the introduction of strict public health measures due to the coronavirus pandemic, we have had to change how we deliver simulation training. In order to reinstate the College of Anaesthesiologists Simulation Training (CAST) programme safely, we have had to make significant logistical changes. We discuss the process of reopening a national simulation anaesthesiology programme during a pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We approached how to reinstate the programme with three distinct but intertwined projects, as in the following: (1) a survey of effects of the pandemic on training opportunities for anaesthesiology trainees, (2) proposals for methods of reinstating simulation were developed under the headings <i>avoidance, compromise, accommodation</i> and <i>collaboration</i>. A small online video-assisted simulation pilot was carried out to test the <i>compromise</i> method, (3) having opted for combined <i>accommodation</i> (onsite with smaller participant numbers and safety measures) and <i>collaboration</i> (with other regional centres), a postreinstatement evaluation during a 4-month period was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Eighty-five per cent of 64 trainees surveyed felt that they had missed out not only just on simulation-based education (43%) but also on other training opportunities, (2) when five trainees were asked to state on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree and strongly agree) whether online video-assisted simulation was similar to face-to-face simulation in four categories (realism, immersion, sense of crisis and stress), only 9 (45%) of the 20 answers agreed they were similar, (3) When onsite simulation was reinstated, the majority of trainees felt that training was similar to prepandemic and were happy to continue with this format.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to reinstate simulation, we have identified that <i>accommodation</i> and <i>collaboration</i> best suited the CAST while <i>compromise</i> failed to rank high among trainees' preferences. Onsite courses will continue to be delivered safely while meeting the high standards our trainees have come to expect.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245283/pdf/bmjstel-2021-000894.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinstating a national simulation programme in anaesthesiology during the coronavirus pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sinead Campbell, Sarah Corbett, Crina L Burlacu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the introduction of strict public health measures due to the coronavirus pandemic, we have had to change how we deliver simulation training. In order to reinstate the College of Anaesthesiologists Simulation Training (CAST) programme safely, we have had to make significant logistical changes. We discuss the process of reopening a national simulation anaesthesiology programme during a pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We approached how to reinstate the programme with three distinct but intertwined projects, as in the following: (1) a survey of effects of the pandemic on training opportunities for anaesthesiology trainees, (2) proposals for methods of reinstating simulation were developed under the headings <i>avoidance, compromise, accommodation</i> and <i>collaboration</i>. A small online video-assisted simulation pilot was carried out to test the <i>compromise</i> method, (3) having opted for combined <i>accommodation</i> (onsite with smaller participant numbers and safety measures) and <i>collaboration</i> (with other regional centres), a postreinstatement evaluation during a 4-month period was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Eighty-five per cent of 64 trainees surveyed felt that they had missed out not only just on simulation-based education (43%) but also on other training opportunities, (2) when five trainees were asked to state on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree and strongly agree) whether online video-assisted simulation was similar to face-to-face simulation in four categories (realism, immersion, sense of crisis and stress), only 9 (45%) of the 20 answers agreed they were similar, (3) When onsite simulation was reinstated, the majority of trainees felt that training was similar to prepandemic and were happy to continue with this format.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to reinstate simulation, we have identified that <i>accommodation</i> and <i>collaboration</i> best suited the CAST while <i>compromise</i> failed to rank high among trainees' preferences. Onsite courses will continue to be delivered safely while meeting the high standards our trainees have come to expect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8245283/pdf/bmjstel-2021-000894.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于冠状病毒大流行而采取了严格的公共卫生措施,我们不得不改变提供模拟培训的方式。为了安全地恢复麻醉医师学院模拟培训(CAST)计划,我们不得不在后勤方面做出重大改变。我们讨论了在大流行病期间重开国家模拟麻醉学计划的过程:我们通过以下三个不同但相互交织的项目来探讨如何恢复该计划:(1)调查大流行对麻醉学学员培训机会的影响,(2)在避免、妥协、通融与合作的标题下提出恢复模拟的方法建议。为测试折中方法,进行了一次小型在线视频辅助模拟试验;(3) 在选择了综合住宿(现场,参与人数较少,并采取了安全措施)和合作(与其他地区中心合作)后,进行了为期 4 个月的恢复后评估。结果如下(1) 在接受调查的 64 名受训人员中,85% 的人认为他们不仅错过了模拟教学(43%),还错过了其他培训机会,(2) 当 5 名受训人员被要求用 1 到 5 级李克特量表(非常不同意、不同意、未决定、(3) 当恢复现场模拟时,大多数受训人员认为培训与学前模拟相似,并乐意继续采用这种形式。结论:为了恢复模拟培训,我们发现通融与合作最适合中国科学技术大学,而折衷方案在受训者的偏好中排名不高。我们将继续安全地提供现场课程,同时满足受训人员的高标准要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinstating a national simulation programme in anaesthesiology during the coronavirus pandemic.

Background: With the introduction of strict public health measures due to the coronavirus pandemic, we have had to change how we deliver simulation training. In order to reinstate the College of Anaesthesiologists Simulation Training (CAST) programme safely, we have had to make significant logistical changes. We discuss the process of reopening a national simulation anaesthesiology programme during a pandemic.

Methods: We approached how to reinstate the programme with three distinct but intertwined projects, as in the following: (1) a survey of effects of the pandemic on training opportunities for anaesthesiology trainees, (2) proposals for methods of reinstating simulation were developed under the headings avoidance, compromise, accommodation and collaboration. A small online video-assisted simulation pilot was carried out to test the compromise method, (3) having opted for combined accommodation (onsite with smaller participant numbers and safety measures) and collaboration (with other regional centres), a postreinstatement evaluation during a 4-month period was carried out.

Results: (1) Eighty-five per cent of 64 trainees surveyed felt that they had missed out not only just on simulation-based education (43%) but also on other training opportunities, (2) when five trainees were asked to state on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree and strongly agree) whether online video-assisted simulation was similar to face-to-face simulation in four categories (realism, immersion, sense of crisis and stress), only 9 (45%) of the 20 answers agreed they were similar, (3) When onsite simulation was reinstated, the majority of trainees felt that training was similar to prepandemic and were happy to continue with this format.

Conclusion: In order to reinstate simulation, we have identified that accommodation and collaboration best suited the CAST while compromise failed to rank high among trainees' preferences. Onsite courses will continue to be delivered safely while meeting the high standards our trainees have come to expect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信