重症监护室的药物警戒:主动监测。

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-14 DOI:10.1177/00185787221144931
Lakshay Kumar Attri, Ballaekere Jayaram Subhash Chandra, Madhan Ramesh, Sri Harsha Chalasani, Jehath Syed, Nikita Pal
{"title":"重症监护室的药物警戒:主动监测。","authors":"Lakshay Kumar Attri, Ballaekere Jayaram Subhash Chandra, Madhan Ramesh, Sri Harsha Chalasani, Jehath Syed, Nikita Pal","doi":"10.1177/00185787221144931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Medical devices are the vital part of healthcare system. The use of medical devices is higher in the intensive care units leading to increased exposure rendering the exponential rise in incidence of medical device associated adverse events (MDAEs). Timely detection and reporting of MDAEs can help reduce the disease and associated liabilities. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the rate, patterns, and predictors of MDAEs. <b>Methods:</b> An active surveillance was carried out in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in southern India. The patients were monitored for MDAEs which were reported based on MvPI guidance document 1.2. The predictors were calculated using an odds ratio at 95% confidence interval. <b>Results:</b> A total of 185 MDAEs were reported amongst 116 patients, of which the majority [74 (63.7%)] were males. Most of the MDAEs were attributed to urethral-catheters [42 (22.7%)] among which a high majority of 34 were associated with urinary tract infections (UTI), followed by ventilators [35 (18.9%)] with all events causing pneumonia. Urethral catheters and ventilators are both classified as categories B and C respectively based on device risk classification provided by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC). Over 58% of MDAEs were reported among the elderly. The causality assessment was possible for 90 (48.6%) MDAEs whereas 86 (46.4%) were probable. The majority of the MDAEs reported were serious [165 (89.2%)] and only [20 (10.8%)] were found to be non-serious on the severity scale. Most [104 (56.2%)] of the devices attributed to MDAEs were single-use devices, of which [103 (55.6%)] were destroyed and only [81 (43.7%)] were retained in healthcare facilities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite the best possible care in the intensive care units (ICUs), MDAEs are inevitable, adding to the burden of patients in terms of suffering, disease, extended hospital stay, and increased costs. MDAEs require rigorous monitoring of patients, especially in the elderly population and patients with increased exposure to multiple devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"58 4","pages":"382-388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Materiovigilance in Intensive Care Units: An Active Surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Lakshay Kumar Attri, Ballaekere Jayaram Subhash Chandra, Madhan Ramesh, Sri Harsha Chalasani, Jehath Syed, Nikita Pal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787221144931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Medical devices are the vital part of healthcare system. The use of medical devices is higher in the intensive care units leading to increased exposure rendering the exponential rise in incidence of medical device associated adverse events (MDAEs). Timely detection and reporting of MDAEs can help reduce the disease and associated liabilities. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the rate, patterns, and predictors of MDAEs. <b>Methods:</b> An active surveillance was carried out in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in southern India. The patients were monitored for MDAEs which were reported based on MvPI guidance document 1.2. The predictors were calculated using an odds ratio at 95% confidence interval. <b>Results:</b> A total of 185 MDAEs were reported amongst 116 patients, of which the majority [74 (63.7%)] were males. Most of the MDAEs were attributed to urethral-catheters [42 (22.7%)] among which a high majority of 34 were associated with urinary tract infections (UTI), followed by ventilators [35 (18.9%)] with all events causing pneumonia. Urethral catheters and ventilators are both classified as categories B and C respectively based on device risk classification provided by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC). Over 58% of MDAEs were reported among the elderly. The causality assessment was possible for 90 (48.6%) MDAEs whereas 86 (46.4%) were probable. The majority of the MDAEs reported were serious [165 (89.2%)] and only [20 (10.8%)] were found to be non-serious on the severity scale. Most [104 (56.2%)] of the devices attributed to MDAEs were single-use devices, of which [103 (55.6%)] were destroyed and only [81 (43.7%)] were retained in healthcare facilities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite the best possible care in the intensive care units (ICUs), MDAEs are inevitable, adding to the burden of patients in terms of suffering, disease, extended hospital stay, and increased costs. MDAEs require rigorous monitoring of patients, especially in the elderly population and patients with increased exposure to multiple devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"382-388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787221144931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787221144931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗设备是医疗保健系统的重要组成部分。重症监护室中医疗器械的使用率较高,导致医疗器械相关不良事件(MDAEs)的发生率呈指数级上升。及时发现和报告 MDAE 有助于减少疾病和相关责任。目标:确定 MDAEs 的发生率、模式和预测因素。方法:在印度南部一家三级医疗教学医院的重症监护病房(ICU)开展了一项主动监测。根据 MvPI 指导文件 1.2,对患者的 MDAEs 进行监测和报告。预测因素采用95%置信区间的几率比率进行计算。结果116 名患者共报告了 185 例 MDAE,其中大多数[74 例(63.7%)]为男性。大多数 MDAE 事件与尿道导管有关 [42 (22.7%)],其中 34 例与尿路感染 (UTI) 有关,其次是呼吸机 [35(18.9%)],所有事件均与肺炎有关。根据印度药典委员会(IPC)提供的器械风险分类,尿道导管和呼吸机分别被列为 B 类和 C 类。据报告,超过 58% 的 MDAE 发生在老年人身上。90例(48.6%)MDAE的因果关系评估为可能,86例(46.4%)为可能。大多数报告的 MDAE 都是严重的 [165 (89.2%)],只有 [20 (10.8%)]在严重程度上被认定为不严重。大多数[104 (56.2%)]归因于 MDAE 的器械是一次性器械,其中[103 (55.6%)]被销毁,只有[81 (43.7%)]被保留在医疗机构中。结论:尽管重症监护室(ICU)提供了尽可能最好的护理,但 MDAEs 仍不可避免,这会增加患者的痛苦、疾病、住院时间和费用负担。MDAE 需要对患者进行严格监控,尤其是老年人群和接触多种设备的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Materiovigilance in Intensive Care Units: An Active Surveillance.

Background: Medical devices are the vital part of healthcare system. The use of medical devices is higher in the intensive care units leading to increased exposure rendering the exponential rise in incidence of medical device associated adverse events (MDAEs). Timely detection and reporting of MDAEs can help reduce the disease and associated liabilities. Objective: To determine the rate, patterns, and predictors of MDAEs. Methods: An active surveillance was carried out in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in southern India. The patients were monitored for MDAEs which were reported based on MvPI guidance document 1.2. The predictors were calculated using an odds ratio at 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 185 MDAEs were reported amongst 116 patients, of which the majority [74 (63.7%)] were males. Most of the MDAEs were attributed to urethral-catheters [42 (22.7%)] among which a high majority of 34 were associated with urinary tract infections (UTI), followed by ventilators [35 (18.9%)] with all events causing pneumonia. Urethral catheters and ventilators are both classified as categories B and C respectively based on device risk classification provided by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC). Over 58% of MDAEs were reported among the elderly. The causality assessment was possible for 90 (48.6%) MDAEs whereas 86 (46.4%) were probable. The majority of the MDAEs reported were serious [165 (89.2%)] and only [20 (10.8%)] were found to be non-serious on the severity scale. Most [104 (56.2%)] of the devices attributed to MDAEs were single-use devices, of which [103 (55.6%)] were destroyed and only [81 (43.7%)] were retained in healthcare facilities. Conclusions: Despite the best possible care in the intensive care units (ICUs), MDAEs are inevitable, adding to the burden of patients in terms of suffering, disease, extended hospital stay, and increased costs. MDAEs require rigorous monitoring of patients, especially in the elderly population and patients with increased exposure to multiple devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信