成人神经肌肉疾病患者肺容量恢复的随机对照临床试验。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nicole L Sheers, Mark E Howard, Peter D Rochford, Linda Rautela, Caroline Chao, Douglas A McKim, David J Berlowitz
{"title":"成人神经肌肉疾病患者肺容量恢复的随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Nicole L Sheers,&nbsp;Mark E Howard,&nbsp;Peter D Rochford,&nbsp;Linda Rautela,&nbsp;Caroline Chao,&nbsp;Douglas A McKim,&nbsp;David J Berlowitz","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Clinical care guidelines advise that lung volume recruitment (LVR) be performed routinely by people with neuromuscular disease (NMD) to maintain lung and chest wall flexibility and slow lung function decline. However, the evidence base is limited, and no randomized controlled trials of regular LVR in adults have been published. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the effect of regular LVR on respiratory function and quality of life in adults with NMD. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized controlled trial with assessor blinding was conducted between September 2015 and May 2019. People (>14 years old) with NMD and vital capacity <80% predicted were eligible, stratified by disease subgroup (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease or other NMDs), and randomized to 3 months of twice-daily LVR or breathing exercises. The primary outcome was change in maximum insufflation capacity (MIC) from baseline to 3 months, analyzed using a linear mixed model approach. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-six participants (47% woman; median age, 57 [31-68] years; mean baseline vital capacity, 40 ± 18% predicted) were randomized (LVR, <i>n</i> = 37). Seventy-three participants completed the study. There was a statistically significant difference in MIC between groups (linear model interaction effect <i>P</i> = 0.002, observed mean difference, 0.19 [0.00-0.39] L). MIC increased by 0.13 (0.01-0.25) L in the LVR group, predominantly within the first month. No interaction or treatment effects were observed in secondary outcomes of lung volumes, respiratory system compliance, and quality of life. No adverse events were reported. <b>Conclusions:</b> Regular LVR increased MIC in a sample of LVR-naive participants with NMD. We found no direct evidence that regular LVR modifies respiratory mechanics or slows the rate of lung volume decline. The implications of increasing MIC are unclear, and the change in MIC may represent practice. Prospective long-term clinical cohorts with comprehensive follow-up, objective LVR use, and clinically meaningful outcome data are needed. Clinical trial registered with anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12615000565549).</p>","PeriodicalId":8018,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1445-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/63/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC.PMC10559144.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lung Volume Recruitment in Adults with Neuromuscular Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole L Sheers,&nbsp;Mark E Howard,&nbsp;Peter D Rochford,&nbsp;Linda Rautela,&nbsp;Caroline Chao,&nbsp;Douglas A McKim,&nbsp;David J Berlowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Clinical care guidelines advise that lung volume recruitment (LVR) be performed routinely by people with neuromuscular disease (NMD) to maintain lung and chest wall flexibility and slow lung function decline. However, the evidence base is limited, and no randomized controlled trials of regular LVR in adults have been published. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the effect of regular LVR on respiratory function and quality of life in adults with NMD. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized controlled trial with assessor blinding was conducted between September 2015 and May 2019. People (>14 years old) with NMD and vital capacity <80% predicted were eligible, stratified by disease subgroup (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease or other NMDs), and randomized to 3 months of twice-daily LVR or breathing exercises. The primary outcome was change in maximum insufflation capacity (MIC) from baseline to 3 months, analyzed using a linear mixed model approach. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-six participants (47% woman; median age, 57 [31-68] years; mean baseline vital capacity, 40 ± 18% predicted) were randomized (LVR, <i>n</i> = 37). Seventy-three participants completed the study. There was a statistically significant difference in MIC between groups (linear model interaction effect <i>P</i> = 0.002, observed mean difference, 0.19 [0.00-0.39] L). MIC increased by 0.13 (0.01-0.25) L in the LVR group, predominantly within the first month. No interaction or treatment effects were observed in secondary outcomes of lung volumes, respiratory system compliance, and quality of life. No adverse events were reported. <b>Conclusions:</b> Regular LVR increased MIC in a sample of LVR-naive participants with NMD. We found no direct evidence that regular LVR modifies respiratory mechanics or slows the rate of lung volume decline. The implications of increasing MIC are unclear, and the change in MIC may represent practice. Prospective long-term clinical cohorts with comprehensive follow-up, objective LVR use, and clinically meaningful outcome data are needed. Clinical trial registered with anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12615000565549).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1445-1455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/63/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC.PMC10559144.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1062OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:临床护理指南建议,神经肌肉疾病(NMD)患者应定期进行肺容量恢复(LVR),以保持肺和胸壁的灵活性,减缓肺功能下降。然而,证据基础有限,尚未发表成人常规LVR的随机对照试验。目的:评价常规LVR对NMD患者呼吸功能和生活质量的影响。方法:2015年9月至2019年5月进行了一项评估者盲法随机对照试验。人员(>14 年龄)NMD和肺活量结果:76名参与者(47%为女性;中位年龄57[31-68]岁;平均基线肺活量40 ± 预测18%)随机分组(LVR = 37)。73名参与者完成了这项研究。各组间MIC差异有统计学意义(线性模型交互作用P = 0.002,观察到的平均差异为0.19[0.00-0.39]L)。LVR组的MIC增加了0.13(0.01-0.25)L,主要在第一个月内。在肺容量、呼吸系统顺应性和生活质量的次要结果中没有观察到相互作用或治疗效果。未报告不良事件。结论:有规律的LVR增加了NMD患者的MIC。我们没有发现直接证据表明常规LVR可以改变呼吸力学或减缓肺容量下降的速度。增加MIC的含义尚不清楚,MIC的变化可能代表着实践。需要具有全面随访、客观LVR使用和有临床意义的结果数据的前瞻性长期临床队列。在anzctr.org.au注册的临床试验(ACTRN12615000565549)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lung Volume Recruitment in Adults with Neuromuscular Disease.

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lung Volume Recruitment in Adults with Neuromuscular Disease.

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lung Volume Recruitment in Adults with Neuromuscular Disease.

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lung Volume Recruitment in Adults with Neuromuscular Disease.

Rationale: Clinical care guidelines advise that lung volume recruitment (LVR) be performed routinely by people with neuromuscular disease (NMD) to maintain lung and chest wall flexibility and slow lung function decline. However, the evidence base is limited, and no randomized controlled trials of regular LVR in adults have been published. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of regular LVR on respiratory function and quality of life in adults with NMD. Methods: A randomized controlled trial with assessor blinding was conducted between September 2015 and May 2019. People (>14 years old) with NMD and vital capacity <80% predicted were eligible, stratified by disease subgroup (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease or other NMDs), and randomized to 3 months of twice-daily LVR or breathing exercises. The primary outcome was change in maximum insufflation capacity (MIC) from baseline to 3 months, analyzed using a linear mixed model approach. Results: Seventy-six participants (47% woman; median age, 57 [31-68] years; mean baseline vital capacity, 40 ± 18% predicted) were randomized (LVR, n = 37). Seventy-three participants completed the study. There was a statistically significant difference in MIC between groups (linear model interaction effect P = 0.002, observed mean difference, 0.19 [0.00-0.39] L). MIC increased by 0.13 (0.01-0.25) L in the LVR group, predominantly within the first month. No interaction or treatment effects were observed in secondary outcomes of lung volumes, respiratory system compliance, and quality of life. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Regular LVR increased MIC in a sample of LVR-naive participants with NMD. We found no direct evidence that regular LVR modifies respiratory mechanics or slows the rate of lung volume decline. The implications of increasing MIC are unclear, and the change in MIC may represent practice. Prospective long-term clinical cohorts with comprehensive follow-up, objective LVR use, and clinically meaningful outcome data are needed. Clinical trial registered with anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12615000565549).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of the American Thoracic Society (AnnalsATS) is the official international online journal of the American Thoracic Society. Formerly known as PATS, it provides comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a wide range of topics in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine, respiratory sleep medicine, and adult medical critical care. As a leading journal in its field, AnnalsATS offers up-to-date and reliable information that is directly applicable to clinical practice. It serves as a valuable resource for clinical specialists, supporting their formative and continuing education. Additionally, the journal is committed to promoting public health by publishing research and articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信