左心室辅助装置植入和气管造口术后的临床预测因素和结果。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Harveen K Lamba, Lucy D Hart, Qianzi Zhang, Jackquelin M Loera, Andrew B Civitello, Ajith P Nair, Mourad H Senussi, Gabriel Loor, Kenneth K Liao, Alexis E Shafii, Subhasis Chatterjee
{"title":"左心室辅助装置植入和气管造口术后的临床预测因素和结果。","authors":"Harveen K Lamba, Lucy D Hart, Qianzi Zhang, Jackquelin M Loera, Andrew B Civitello, Ajith P Nair, Mourad H Senussi, Gabriel Loor, Kenneth K Liao, Alexis E Shafii, Subhasis Chatterjee","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative respiratory failure is a major complication that affects up to 10% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery and has a high in-hospital mortality rate. Few studies have investigated whether patients who require tracheostomy for postoperative respiratory failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation have worse survival outcomes than patients who do not.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy in CF-LVAD recipients and to compare survival outcomes between those who did and did not require tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent primary CF-LVAD placement at a single institution between August 1, 2002, and December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching accounted for baseline differences between the tracheostomy and nontracheostomy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify tracheostomy risk factors and 90-day survival; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess midterm survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 664 patients received a CF-LVAD; 106 (16.0%) underwent tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Propensity score matching produced 103 matched tracheostomy-nontracheostomy pairs. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were older (mean [SD] age, 57.9 [12.3] vs 54.6 [13.9] years; P = .02) and more likely to need preoperative mechanical circulatory support (61.3% vs 47.8%; P = .01) and preoperative intubation (27.4% vs 8.8%; P < .001); serum creatinine was higher in the tracheostomy group (mean [SD], 1.7 [1.0] vs 1.4 [0.6] mg/dL; P < .001), correlating with tracheostomy need (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.21-2.56; P = .003). Both before and after propensity matching, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival were worse in patients who underwent tracheostomy. Median follow-up was 0.8 years (range, 0.0-11.2 years). Three-year Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly worse for the tracheostomy group before (22.0% vs 61.0%; P < .001) and after (22.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001) matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the substantially increased probability of death in patients who develop respiratory failure and need tracheostomy, those at high risk for respiratory failure should be carefully considered for CF-LVAD implantation. Comprehensive management to decrease respiratory failure before and after surgery is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":22352,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Predictors and Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Tracheostomy.\",\"authors\":\"Harveen K Lamba, Lucy D Hart, Qianzi Zhang, Jackquelin M Loera, Andrew B Civitello, Ajith P Nair, Mourad H Senussi, Gabriel Loor, Kenneth K Liao, Alexis E Shafii, Subhasis Chatterjee\",\"doi\":\"10.14503/THIJ-23-8100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative respiratory failure is a major complication that affects up to 10% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery and has a high in-hospital mortality rate. Few studies have investigated whether patients who require tracheostomy for postoperative respiratory failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation have worse survival outcomes than patients who do not.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy in CF-LVAD recipients and to compare survival outcomes between those who did and did not require tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent primary CF-LVAD placement at a single institution between August 1, 2002, and December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching accounted for baseline differences between the tracheostomy and nontracheostomy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify tracheostomy risk factors and 90-day survival; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess midterm survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 664 patients received a CF-LVAD; 106 (16.0%) underwent tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Propensity score matching produced 103 matched tracheostomy-nontracheostomy pairs. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were older (mean [SD] age, 57.9 [12.3] vs 54.6 [13.9] years; P = .02) and more likely to need preoperative mechanical circulatory support (61.3% vs 47.8%; P = .01) and preoperative intubation (27.4% vs 8.8%; P < .001); serum creatinine was higher in the tracheostomy group (mean [SD], 1.7 [1.0] vs 1.4 [0.6] mg/dL; P < .001), correlating with tracheostomy need (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.21-2.56; P = .003). Both before and after propensity matching, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival were worse in patients who underwent tracheostomy. Median follow-up was 0.8 years (range, 0.0-11.2 years). Three-year Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly worse for the tracheostomy group before (22.0% vs 61.0%; P < .001) and after (22.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001) matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the substantially increased probability of death in patients who develop respiratory failure and need tracheostomy, those at high risk for respiratory failure should be carefully considered for CF-LVAD implantation. Comprehensive management to decrease respiratory failure before and after surgery is critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后呼吸衰竭是一种主要并发症,影响高达10%的心脏手术患者,住院死亡率很高。很少有研究调查在连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)植入后因术后呼吸衰竭而需要气管造口术的患者是否比不需要的患者的生存结果更差。目的:确定CF-LVAD受试者呼吸衰竭需要气管造口术的危险因素,并比较需要和不需要气管造口的受试者的生存结果。方法:回顾性分析2002年8月1日至2019年12月31日期间在单一机构接受原发性CF-LVAD植入的连续患者。倾向评分匹配解释了气管造口术和非气管造口术组之间的基线差异。多变量逻辑回归用于确定气管造口术的危险因素和90天生存率;Kaplan-Meier分析用于评估中期生存率。结果:在研究期间,664名患者接受了CF-LVAD;106例(16.0%)因呼吸衰竭行气管造口术。倾向评分匹配产生103对匹配的气管造口术-非气管造口术配对。接受气管造口术的患者年龄较大(平均[SD]年龄,57.9[12.3]vs 54.6[13.9]岁;P=0.02),更可能需要术前机械循环支持(61.3%vs 47.8%;P=0.01)和术前插管(27.4%vs 8.8%;P<.001);气管造口术组的血清肌酸酐较高(平均[SD],1.7[1.0]vs 1.4[0.6]mg/dL;P<.001),与气管造口术需求相关(比值比,1.76;95%可信区间,1.21-2.56;P=0.003)。在倾向匹配前后,气管造口术患者的30天、60天、90天和1年生存率均较差。中位随访时间为0.8年(0.0-11.2年)。气管造口术组在匹配前(22.0%vs 61.0%;P<.001)和匹配后(22.4%vs 48.3%;P<0.001)的三年Kaplan-Meier生存率明显较差。结论:鉴于发生呼吸衰竭并需要气管造口术的患者的死亡概率显著增加,应仔细考虑那些呼吸衰竭高危患者进行CF-LVAD植入。在手术前后进行综合管理以减少呼吸衰竭是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Predictors and Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Tracheostomy.

Background: Postoperative respiratory failure is a major complication that affects up to 10% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery and has a high in-hospital mortality rate. Few studies have investigated whether patients who require tracheostomy for postoperative respiratory failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation have worse survival outcomes than patients who do not.

Objective: To identify risk factors for respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy in CF-LVAD recipients and to compare survival outcomes between those who did and did not require tracheostomy.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent primary CF-LVAD placement at a single institution between August 1, 2002, and December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching accounted for baseline differences between the tracheostomy and nontracheostomy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify tracheostomy risk factors and 90-day survival; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess midterm survival.

Results: During the study period, 664 patients received a CF-LVAD; 106 (16.0%) underwent tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Propensity score matching produced 103 matched tracheostomy-nontracheostomy pairs. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were older (mean [SD] age, 57.9 [12.3] vs 54.6 [13.9] years; P = .02) and more likely to need preoperative mechanical circulatory support (61.3% vs 47.8%; P = .01) and preoperative intubation (27.4% vs 8.8%; P < .001); serum creatinine was higher in the tracheostomy group (mean [SD], 1.7 [1.0] vs 1.4 [0.6] mg/dL; P < .001), correlating with tracheostomy need (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.21-2.56; P = .003). Both before and after propensity matching, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival were worse in patients who underwent tracheostomy. Median follow-up was 0.8 years (range, 0.0-11.2 years). Three-year Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly worse for the tracheostomy group before (22.0% vs 61.0%; P < .001) and after (22.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001) matching.

Conclusion: Given the substantially increased probability of death in patients who develop respiratory failure and need tracheostomy, those at high risk for respiratory failure should be carefully considered for CF-LVAD implantation. Comprehensive management to decrease respiratory failure before and after surgery is critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute journal
Texas Heart Institute journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信