通用胶粘剂在不同粘接策略下对ormoser基树脂复合材料长期粘接强度的影响。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-08-01
Marcelo Wa Cruz, Cecilia P Turssi, Flávia LBdo Amaral, Roberta T Basting, Waldemir F Viera-Junior, Fabiana Mg França
{"title":"通用胶粘剂在不同粘接策略下对ormoser基树脂复合材料长期粘接强度的影响。","authors":"Marcelo Wa Cruz,&nbsp;Cecilia P Turssi,&nbsp;Flávia LBdo Amaral,&nbsp;Roberta T Basting,&nbsp;Waldemir F Viera-Junior,&nbsp;Fabiana Mg França","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate over time the bond strength to dentin of different resin composites (RBCs) associated with the universal adhesive system applied with self-etching or total-etching strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 human third molars were obtained, randomly divided into experimental groups (n= 10) according to RBCs: methacrylate-based nanofilled (Z350 XT); low-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill (Admira Fusion X-base Universal); or high-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-tra). The adhesion procedure was performed using a universal adhesive (Futurabond U) applied in self-etching or total-etching mode. Occlusal preparations (Class I) were made, measuring 4 mm in mesiodistal length, 4 mm in depth, and 3 mm in buccolingual height. The cavities were restored considering the RBCs and adhesive strategies, and the light curing was performed using a LED unit (BluePhase) as recommended by the manufacturers. For this, the nanofilled RBCs were inserted by the oblique incremental technique while the bulk-fill RBCs were inserted in single increments. The samples were stored in water for 24 hours in an oven; to be sectioned, the sticks were randomly separated, stored in distilled water for 24 hours (immediate) or 12 months (long-term), and taken to the universal machine for a microtensile test (MPa). The fractured sticks were examined to classify the type of fracture. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MPa values of methacrylate-based nanofilled or high-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC were not affected by the strategy used to apply the universal adhesive system (P> 0.05). However, for the low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher values were obtained when the total-etching strategy was used compared to the self-etching mode (P< 0.05). After 12 months, when using the total-etching strategy low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher MPa values were obtained compared to the other materials (P< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the high-viscosity RBCs, whether based on methacrylate or Ormocer, showed similar adhesive behavior. Low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC showed greater long-term bond strength associated with the universal adhesive applied in the total-etching strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 4","pages":"201-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term bond strength of ormocer-based resin composites using a universal adhesive used in different adhesive strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Wa Cruz,&nbsp;Cecilia P Turssi,&nbsp;Flávia LBdo Amaral,&nbsp;Roberta T Basting,&nbsp;Waldemir F Viera-Junior,&nbsp;Fabiana Mg França\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate over time the bond strength to dentin of different resin composites (RBCs) associated with the universal adhesive system applied with self-etching or total-etching strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 human third molars were obtained, randomly divided into experimental groups (n= 10) according to RBCs: methacrylate-based nanofilled (Z350 XT); low-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill (Admira Fusion X-base Universal); or high-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-tra). The adhesion procedure was performed using a universal adhesive (Futurabond U) applied in self-etching or total-etching mode. Occlusal preparations (Class I) were made, measuring 4 mm in mesiodistal length, 4 mm in depth, and 3 mm in buccolingual height. The cavities were restored considering the RBCs and adhesive strategies, and the light curing was performed using a LED unit (BluePhase) as recommended by the manufacturers. For this, the nanofilled RBCs were inserted by the oblique incremental technique while the bulk-fill RBCs were inserted in single increments. The samples were stored in water for 24 hours in an oven; to be sectioned, the sticks were randomly separated, stored in distilled water for 24 hours (immediate) or 12 months (long-term), and taken to the universal machine for a microtensile test (MPa). The fractured sticks were examined to classify the type of fracture. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MPa values of methacrylate-based nanofilled or high-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC were not affected by the strategy used to apply the universal adhesive system (P> 0.05). However, for the low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher values were obtained when the total-etching strategy was used compared to the self-etching mode (P< 0.05). After 12 months, when using the total-etching strategy low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher MPa values were obtained compared to the other materials (P< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the high-viscosity RBCs, whether based on methacrylate or Ormocer, showed similar adhesive behavior. Low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC showed greater long-term bond strength associated with the universal adhesive applied in the total-etching strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"201-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估不同树脂复合材料(rbc)与自蚀刻或全蚀刻通用粘合剂系统随时间的结合强度。方法:取人第三磨牙60颗,按红细胞大小随机分为实验组(n= 10):甲基丙烯酸酯基纳米填充(Z350 XT);低粘度ormocer基散装填料(Admira Fusion X-base Universal);或高粘度ormocer基块状填充复合材料(Admira Fusion X-tra)。粘附过程使用通用粘合剂(Futurabond U)在自蚀刻或全蚀刻模式下进行。制作I类咬合制剂,测量近远端长度4mm,深度4mm,颊舌高度3mm。考虑到红细胞和粘合剂策略,修复腔体,并按照制造商的建议使用LED单元(BluePhase)进行光固化。为此,纳米填充红细胞采用斜增量技术插入,而体填充红细胞采用单增量插入。样品在烤箱中用水保存24小时;将待切片的棒材随机分开,在蒸馏水中保存24小时(即时)或12个月(长期),并带到万能机上进行微拉伸试验(MPa)。对骨折棒进行检查,对骨折类型进行分类。结果采用方差分析和Tukey检验(α= 0.05)。结果:应用通用黏附系统的策略对甲基丙烯酸酯基纳米填充红细胞和高粘度ormoer基红细胞的MPa值没有影响(P> 0.05)。然而,对于低粘度ormoser基RBC,与自蚀刻模式相比,采用全蚀刻策略获得的值更高(P< 0.05)。12个月后,使用全蚀刻策略时,低粘度ormoer基RBC获得的MPa值高于其他材料(P< 0.05)。临床意义:无论采用何种黏附策略,高粘度红细胞,无论是基于甲基丙烯酸酯还是基于Ormocer,都表现出相似的黏附行为。低粘度ormocer基RBC显示出与全蚀刻策略中应用的通用粘合剂相关的更大的长期结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term bond strength of ormocer-based resin composites using a universal adhesive used in different adhesive strategies.

Purpose: To evaluate over time the bond strength to dentin of different resin composites (RBCs) associated with the universal adhesive system applied with self-etching or total-etching strategies.

Methods: 60 human third molars were obtained, randomly divided into experimental groups (n= 10) according to RBCs: methacrylate-based nanofilled (Z350 XT); low-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill (Admira Fusion X-base Universal); or high-viscosity Ormocer-based bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-tra). The adhesion procedure was performed using a universal adhesive (Futurabond U) applied in self-etching or total-etching mode. Occlusal preparations (Class I) were made, measuring 4 mm in mesiodistal length, 4 mm in depth, and 3 mm in buccolingual height. The cavities were restored considering the RBCs and adhesive strategies, and the light curing was performed using a LED unit (BluePhase) as recommended by the manufacturers. For this, the nanofilled RBCs were inserted by the oblique incremental technique while the bulk-fill RBCs were inserted in single increments. The samples were stored in water for 24 hours in an oven; to be sectioned, the sticks were randomly separated, stored in distilled water for 24 hours (immediate) or 12 months (long-term), and taken to the universal machine for a microtensile test (MPa). The fractured sticks were examined to classify the type of fracture. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α= 0.05).

Results: The MPa values of methacrylate-based nanofilled or high-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC were not affected by the strategy used to apply the universal adhesive system (P> 0.05). However, for the low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher values were obtained when the total-etching strategy was used compared to the self-etching mode (P< 0.05). After 12 months, when using the total-etching strategy low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC, higher MPa values were obtained compared to the other materials (P< 0.05).

Clinical significance: Regardless of the adhesive strategy used, the high-viscosity RBCs, whether based on methacrylate or Ormocer, showed similar adhesive behavior. Low-viscosity Ormocer-based RBC showed greater long-term bond strength associated with the universal adhesive applied in the total-etching strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信