从心脏植入式电子设备到CareLink网络的警报传输性能:回顾性分析

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Edmond M. Cronin MB, BCh, BAO, FHRS , Joseph C. Green BS , Jeff Lande PhD , Thomas R. Holmes PhD , Daniel Lexcen PhD , Tyler Taigen MD, FHRS
{"title":"从心脏植入式电子设备到CareLink网络的警报传输性能:回顾性分析","authors":"Edmond M. Cronin MB, BCh, BAO, FHRS ,&nbsp;Joseph C. Green BS ,&nbsp;Jeff Lande PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Holmes PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Lexcen PhD ,&nbsp;Tyler Taigen MD, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/36/main.PMC10282010.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Edmond M. Cronin MB, BCh, BAO, FHRS ,&nbsp;Joseph C. Green BS ,&nbsp;Jeff Lande PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Holmes PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Lexcen PhD ,&nbsp;Tyler Taigen MD, FHRS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/36/main.PMC10282010.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景心脏植入式电气设备的远程监测可改善患者的预后和体验。基于警报的系统几乎实时地向医生通知临床或设备问题,但其有效性取决于设备连接。目的通过分析从患者收发器到CareLink网络的警报传输时间来评估患者的连接。方法回顾性地从美国取消身份的美敦力CareLink数据库中收集警报传输。警报传输时间定义为从警报发生到到达CareLink网络的持续时间,并按设备类型、警报事件和警报类型进行分析。使用先前研究的数据,我们计算了每日连接检查的好处。结果平均警报传播时间为14.8小时(中位数=6小时),90.9%的警报传播在24小时内收到。与植入式心律转复除颤器(13.7±29.5小时)和心脏再同步治疗除颤器(13.5±30.2小时)相比,植入式脉冲发生器(17.0±40.2小时)和心肌再同步治疗起搏器(17.2±42.5小时)的警报传输时间更长,但所有4种设备类型的中位时间均为6小时。特定警报事件之间的警报时间存在差异。根据我们的数据和之前的研究,每日连接检查可以将每日警报传输成功率提高8.5%,但在任何一天都需要增加近800小时的员工时间。结论美敦力设备的警报传输性能令人满意,患者连接问题可能突出了一些延迟。每天的连接检查可以在一定程度上提高传播成功率,但代价是增加诊所负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis

Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis

Background

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity.

Objective

To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network.

Methods

Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks.

Results

The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day.

Conclusion

Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信