PMcardio智能手机应用程序在初级保健中基于人工智能的心电图解释的诊断准确性(AMSTELHEART-1)

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jelle C.L. Himmelreich MD, MSc , Ralf E. Harskamp MD, PhD
{"title":"PMcardio智能手机应用程序在初级保健中基于人工智能的心电图解释的诊断准确性(AMSTELHEART-1)","authors":"Jelle C.L. Himmelreich MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ralf E. Harskamp MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is common in routine primary care, however it can be difficult for less experienced ECG readers to adequately interpret the ECG.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate a smartphone application (PMcardio) as a stand-alone interpretation tool for 12-lead ECG in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited consecutive patients who underwent 12-lead ECG as part of routinely indicated primary care in the Netherlands. All ECGs were assessed by the PMcardio app, which analyzes a photographed image of 12-lead ECG for automated interpretation, installed on an Android platform (Samsung Galaxy M31) and an iOS platform (iPhone SE2020). We validated the PMcardio app for detecting any major ECG abnormality (MEA, primary outcome), defined as atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), markers of (past) myocardial ischemia, or clinically relevant impulse and/or conduction abnormalities; or AF (key secondary outcome) with a blinded expert panel as reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 290 patients from 11 Dutch general practices with median age 67 (interquartile range 55–74) years; 48% were female. On reference ECG, 71 patients (25%) had MEA and 35 (12%) had AF. Sensitivity and specificity of PMcardio for MEA were 86% (95% CI: 76%–93%) and 92% (95% CI: 87%–95%), respectively. For AF, sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI: 85%–100%) and 99% (95% CI: 97%–100%), respectively. Performance was comparable between Android and iOS platform (kappa = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99 and kappa = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.00 for MEA and AF, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A smartphone app developed to interpret 12-lead ECGs was found to have good diagnostic accuracy in a primary care setting for major ECG abnormalities, and near-perfect properties for diagnosing AF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282008/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of the PMcardio smartphone application for artificial intelligence–based interpretation of electrocardiograms in primary care (AMSTELHEART-1)\",\"authors\":\"Jelle C.L. Himmelreich MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ralf E. Harskamp MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is common in routine primary care, however it can be difficult for less experienced ECG readers to adequately interpret the ECG.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate a smartphone application (PMcardio) as a stand-alone interpretation tool for 12-lead ECG in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited consecutive patients who underwent 12-lead ECG as part of routinely indicated primary care in the Netherlands. All ECGs were assessed by the PMcardio app, which analyzes a photographed image of 12-lead ECG for automated interpretation, installed on an Android platform (Samsung Galaxy M31) and an iOS platform (iPhone SE2020). We validated the PMcardio app for detecting any major ECG abnormality (MEA, primary outcome), defined as atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), markers of (past) myocardial ischemia, or clinically relevant impulse and/or conduction abnormalities; or AF (key secondary outcome) with a blinded expert panel as reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 290 patients from 11 Dutch general practices with median age 67 (interquartile range 55–74) years; 48% were female. On reference ECG, 71 patients (25%) had MEA and 35 (12%) had AF. Sensitivity and specificity of PMcardio for MEA were 86% (95% CI: 76%–93%) and 92% (95% CI: 87%–95%), respectively. For AF, sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI: 85%–100%) and 99% (95% CI: 97%–100%), respectively. Performance was comparable between Android and iOS platform (kappa = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99 and kappa = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.00 for MEA and AF, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A smartphone app developed to interpret 12-lead ECGs was found to have good diagnostic accuracy in a primary care setting for major ECG abnormalities, and near-perfect properties for diagnosing AF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 80-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景12导联心电图(ECG)的使用在常规初级保健中很常见,但经验不足的心电图读者可能很难充分解读心电图。目的验证智能手机应用程序(PMcardiod)作为初级保健中12导联心电图的独立解读工具。方法我们在荷兰招募了连续接受12导联心电图检查的患者,作为常规指征初级保健的一部分。所有心电图都由安装在安卓平台(三星Galaxy M31)和iOS平台(iPhone SE2020)上的PMcardious应用程序进行评估,该应用程序分析12导联心电图的拍摄图像以进行自动解读。我们验证了PMcardious应用程序用于检测任何主要心电图异常(MEA,主要结果),定义为心房颤动/扑动(AF)、(过去)心肌缺血的标志物或临床相关的冲动和/或传导异常;或以盲法专家小组作为参考标准的AF(关键次要结果)。结果我们纳入了来自荷兰11家全科诊所的290名患者,中位年龄为67岁(四分位间距55-74);48%为女性。在参考心电图中,71名患者(25%)患有MEA,35名患者(12%)患有AF。PMcardiod对MEA的敏感性和特异性分别为86%(95%CI:76%-93%)和92%(95%CI:87%-95%)。AF的敏感性和特异性分别为97%(95%CI:85%-100%)和99%(95%CI:97%-100%)。Android和iOS平台的性能相当(MEA和AF的kappa=0.95,95%CI:0.91–0.99和kappa=1.00,95%CI:1.00–1.00)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic accuracy of the PMcardio smartphone application for artificial intelligence–based interpretation of electrocardiograms in primary care (AMSTELHEART-1)

Diagnostic accuracy of the PMcardio smartphone application for artificial intelligence–based interpretation of electrocardiograms in primary care (AMSTELHEART-1)

Diagnostic accuracy of the PMcardio smartphone application for artificial intelligence–based interpretation of electrocardiograms in primary care (AMSTELHEART-1)

Background

The use of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is common in routine primary care, however it can be difficult for less experienced ECG readers to adequately interpret the ECG.

Objective

To validate a smartphone application (PMcardio) as a stand-alone interpretation tool for 12-lead ECG in primary care.

Methods

We recruited consecutive patients who underwent 12-lead ECG as part of routinely indicated primary care in the Netherlands. All ECGs were assessed by the PMcardio app, which analyzes a photographed image of 12-lead ECG for automated interpretation, installed on an Android platform (Samsung Galaxy M31) and an iOS platform (iPhone SE2020). We validated the PMcardio app for detecting any major ECG abnormality (MEA, primary outcome), defined as atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), markers of (past) myocardial ischemia, or clinically relevant impulse and/or conduction abnormalities; or AF (key secondary outcome) with a blinded expert panel as reference standard.

Results

We included 290 patients from 11 Dutch general practices with median age 67 (interquartile range 55–74) years; 48% were female. On reference ECG, 71 patients (25%) had MEA and 35 (12%) had AF. Sensitivity and specificity of PMcardio for MEA were 86% (95% CI: 76%–93%) and 92% (95% CI: 87%–95%), respectively. For AF, sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI: 85%–100%) and 99% (95% CI: 97%–100%), respectively. Performance was comparable between Android and iOS platform (kappa = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99 and kappa = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.00 for MEA and AF, respectively).

Conclusion

A smartphone app developed to interpret 12-lead ECGs was found to have good diagnostic accuracy in a primary care setting for major ECG abnormalities, and near-perfect properties for diagnosing AF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信