生物标志物引导的保肾脓毒症治疗束的可行性评估:脓毒症试验中限制急性肾损伤进展。

Critical Care Explorations Pub Date : 2023-08-21 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961
Hernando Gómez, Alexander Zarbock, Stephen M Pastores, Gyorgy Frendl, Sven Bercker, Pierre Asfar, Steven A Conrad, Jaques Creteur, James Miner, Jean Paul Mira, Johan Motsch, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Thomas Rimmelé, Peter Rosenberger, Christophe Vinsonneau, Bob Birch, Fabienne Heskia, Julien Textoris, Luca Molinari, Louis M Guzzi, Claudio Ronco, John A Kellum
{"title":"生物标志物引导的保肾脓毒症治疗束的可行性评估:脓毒症试验中限制急性肾损伤进展。","authors":"Hernando Gómez, Alexander Zarbock, Stephen M Pastores, Gyorgy Frendl, Sven Bercker, Pierre Asfar, Steven A Conrad, Jaques Creteur, James Miner, Jean Paul Mira, Johan Motsch, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Thomas Rimmelé, Peter Rosenberger, Christophe Vinsonneau, Bob Birch, Fabienne Heskia, Julien Textoris, Luca Molinari, Louis M Guzzi, Claudio Ronco, John A Kellum","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Adaptive, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC (<i>n</i> = 8, 42.0%) or intervention (<i>n</i> = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 8","pages":"e0961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/3f/cc9-5-e0961.PMC10443738.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Assessment of a Biomarker-Guided Kidney-Sparing Sepsis Bundle: The Limiting Acute Kidney Injury Progression In Sepsis Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hernando Gómez, Alexander Zarbock, Stephen M Pastores, Gyorgy Frendl, Sven Bercker, Pierre Asfar, Steven A Conrad, Jaques Creteur, James Miner, Jean Paul Mira, Johan Motsch, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Thomas Rimmelé, Peter Rosenberger, Christophe Vinsonneau, Bob Birch, Fabienne Heskia, Julien Textoris, Luca Molinari, Louis M Guzzi, Claudio Ronco, John A Kellum\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Adaptive, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC (<i>n</i> = 8, 42.0%) or intervention (<i>n</i> = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"e0961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/3f/cc9-5-e0961.PMC10443738.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定生物标志物指导下实施保肾脓毒症一揽子治疗(KSSB)与标准治疗(SOC)对脓毒症患者临床结果的可行性、安全性和有效性。设计:适应性、多中心、随机临床试验。环境:欧洲和北美的五所大学医院。患者:诊断为脓毒症或感染性休克,留置导尿管入住ICU的成人患者,无急性肾损伤(急性肾损伤)2期或3期或慢性肾病。干预措施:基于肾脏疾病的三级KSSB:改善总体结局(KDIGOs)建议,以尿组织金属蛋白酶抑制剂-2和胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7作为联合生物标志物的系列测量为指导[TIMP2]•[IGFBP7]。测量结果和主要结果:由于与COVID-19大流行相关的低入组率,该试验被停止。在12个月的时间里,19名患者被随机分配到SOC组(n = 8, 42.0%)或干预组(n = 11, 58.0%)。主要终点是可行性,关键次要终点是安全性和有效性。分配到前两个KSSB水平的患者的方案依从性为19名患者中的15名(81.8%)和19名患者中的19名(100%),但3级KSSB患者的方案依从性为4名患者中的1名(25%)。干预组的严重不良事件发生率(4/11,36.4%)高于对照组(1/8,12.5%),但与研究干预无关。次要疗效指标为死亡、透析或入组后72小时内急性肾损伤进展大于或等于2期的综合疗效指标,对照组8例患者中有3例(37.5%)达到该指标,干预组11例患者中有0例(0%)达到该指标。在对照组中,2例患者出现急性肾损伤进展,1例患者死亡。结论:尽管COVID-19大流行阻碍了招募,但在脓毒症患者中,采用尿[TIMP2]•[IGFBP7]风险分层指导下部署基于kdigo的KSSB治疗策略的实际实施似乎是可行的,并且似乎是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility Assessment of a Biomarker-Guided Kidney-Sparing Sepsis Bundle: The Limiting Acute Kidney Injury Progression In Sepsis Trial.

Feasibility Assessment of a Biomarker-Guided Kidney-Sparing Sepsis Bundle: The Limiting Acute Kidney Injury Progression In Sepsis Trial.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Design: Adaptive, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.

Patients: Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.

Interventions: A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].

Measurements and main results: The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC (n = 8, 42.0%) or intervention (n = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.

Conclusions: Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信