评估有关血液透析动静脉通路评估和插管置入的护理点超声 (POCUS) 培训。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1177/11297298231194100
Kathleen Hill, Ashleigh Jaensch, Jessie Childs, Stephen McDonald
{"title":"评估有关血液透析动静脉通路评估和插管置入的护理点超声 (POCUS) 培训。","authors":"Kathleen Hill, Ashleigh Jaensch, Jessie Childs, Stephen McDonald","doi":"10.1177/11297298231194100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Haemodialysis requires a permanent vascular access and relies on cannulation with two large bore needles. Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool that may assist nursing staff with visualising cannula placement and prevent miscannulation. This can be particularly useful in regional hospitals with limited access to vascular access specialists.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the impact of POCUS provision and education for nursing staff on confidence in cannulation and to understand the patient experience at three regional hospital haemodialysis units in South Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A POCUS machine and dedicated nursing education were provided at each of the three sites. A pre-test post-test model was used to assess the individual nurses perceived competency before and after the delivery of a series of online ultrasound education modules and face to face training. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected to understand the use of POCUS from the client perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a shift towards 'agree' or 'strongly agree' for all nursing surveys in regard to perceived competency (<i>n</i> = 15). This was statistically significant (<i>p</i> ⩽ 0.05) for all questions other than question 1 'I am confident in my ability to physically assess vascular access' (<i>p</i> = 0.06). The patients that completed the PROMs (<i>n</i> = 17) overall supported the ease and use of POCUS for haemodialysis cannulation and felt that it contributed to the nursing staff competency in cannulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS has the potential to be a valuable tool in regional haemodialysis units to support vascular access cannulation and potentially avoid metropolitan transfer due to cannulation difficulties. The non-significant change post intervention for question 1 likely reflects the haemodialysis nurses inherent pre-existing capacity to assess vascular access without the use of POCUS using the standard process of visual inspection, the use of a stethoscope and palpation ('look, listen and feel').</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"1953-1960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) training on arteriovenous access assessment and cannula placement for haemodialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Hill, Ashleigh Jaensch, Jessie Childs, Stephen McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231194100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Haemodialysis requires a permanent vascular access and relies on cannulation with two large bore needles. Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool that may assist nursing staff with visualising cannula placement and prevent miscannulation. This can be particularly useful in regional hospitals with limited access to vascular access specialists.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the impact of POCUS provision and education for nursing staff on confidence in cannulation and to understand the patient experience at three regional hospital haemodialysis units in South Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A POCUS machine and dedicated nursing education were provided at each of the three sites. A pre-test post-test model was used to assess the individual nurses perceived competency before and after the delivery of a series of online ultrasound education modules and face to face training. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected to understand the use of POCUS from the client perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a shift towards 'agree' or 'strongly agree' for all nursing surveys in regard to perceived competency (<i>n</i> = 15). This was statistically significant (<i>p</i> ⩽ 0.05) for all questions other than question 1 'I am confident in my ability to physically assess vascular access' (<i>p</i> = 0.06). The patients that completed the PROMs (<i>n</i> = 17) overall supported the ease and use of POCUS for haemodialysis cannulation and felt that it contributed to the nursing staff competency in cannulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS has the potential to be a valuable tool in regional haemodialysis units to support vascular access cannulation and potentially avoid metropolitan transfer due to cannulation difficulties. The non-significant change post intervention for question 1 likely reflects the haemodialysis nurses inherent pre-existing capacity to assess vascular access without the use of POCUS using the standard process of visual inspection, the use of a stethoscope and palpation ('look, listen and feel').</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1953-1960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231194100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231194100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血液透析需要永久性的血管通路,并依靠两根大口径针头进行插管。护理点超声(POCUS)是一种可帮助护理人员观察插管位置并防止误插的工具。目的:在南澳大利亚州的三家地区医院血液透析室,研究为护理人员提供 POCUS 和教育对插管信心的影响,并了解患者的体验:方法: 在三个地点分别提供一台 POCUS 机器和专门的护理教育。在提供一系列在线超声波教育模块和面对面培训之前和之后,采用前测后测模式对护士的个人能力进行评估。此外,还收集了患者报告结果指标(PROMs),以便从患者角度了解 POCUS 的使用情况:结果:在所有护理能力感知调查(n = 15)中,护理能力感知均向 "同意 "或 "非常同意 "转变。除问题 1 "我对自己实际评估血管通路的能力有信心"(p = 0.06)外,其他所有问题均有统计学意义(p ⩽0.05)。完成PROMs的患者(n = 17)总体上支持POCUS在血液透析插管中的简便性和使用,并认为它有助于提高护理人员的插管能力:结论:POCUS 有可能成为地区性血液透析室的重要工具,支持血管通路插管,并有可能避免因插管困难而导致的转院。问题 1 干预后无显著变化可能反映了血液透析护士在不使用 POCUS 的情况下,通过视觉检查、使用听诊器和触诊("看、听、摸")等标准流程评估血管通路的固有能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) training on arteriovenous access assessment and cannula placement for haemodialysis.

Background: Haemodialysis requires a permanent vascular access and relies on cannulation with two large bore needles. Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool that may assist nursing staff with visualising cannula placement and prevent miscannulation. This can be particularly useful in regional hospitals with limited access to vascular access specialists.

Aims: To examine the impact of POCUS provision and education for nursing staff on confidence in cannulation and to understand the patient experience at three regional hospital haemodialysis units in South Australia.

Methods: A POCUS machine and dedicated nursing education were provided at each of the three sites. A pre-test post-test model was used to assess the individual nurses perceived competency before and after the delivery of a series of online ultrasound education modules and face to face training. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected to understand the use of POCUS from the client perspective.

Results: There was a shift towards 'agree' or 'strongly agree' for all nursing surveys in regard to perceived competency (n = 15). This was statistically significant (p ⩽ 0.05) for all questions other than question 1 'I am confident in my ability to physically assess vascular access' (p = 0.06). The patients that completed the PROMs (n = 17) overall supported the ease and use of POCUS for haemodialysis cannulation and felt that it contributed to the nursing staff competency in cannulation.

Conclusion: POCUS has the potential to be a valuable tool in regional haemodialysis units to support vascular access cannulation and potentially avoid metropolitan transfer due to cannulation difficulties. The non-significant change post intervention for question 1 likely reflects the haemodialysis nurses inherent pre-existing capacity to assess vascular access without the use of POCUS using the standard process of visual inspection, the use of a stethoscope and palpation ('look, listen and feel').

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信