探讨联合医疗专业在英国国家医疗服务机构高级领导职位中的代表性。

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nicola Eddison, Aoife Healy, Nina Darke, Mary Jones, Millar Leask, Gwen L Roberts, Nachiappan Chockalingam
{"title":"探讨联合医疗专业在英国国家医疗服务机构高级领导职位中的代表性。","authors":"Nicola Eddison, Aoife Healy, Nina Darke, Mary Jones, Millar Leask, Gwen L Roberts, Nachiappan Chockalingam","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allied health professionals (AHPs) are an important group within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK and make up a large portion of the workforce. Investment in AHP leadership is believed to lead to improvements in patient care, resource use, collaboration and innovation. This study aims to assess the current state of AHP strategic leadership within the NHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A freedom of information (FOI) request was sent to all NHS Trusts and health boards (HBs) within the UK NHS. The questions focused on the AHP workforce, with a particular interest in the chief AHPs (or equivalent roles) working in an NHS setting. Analysis of the FOI used a range of descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 217 Trusts/HBs contacted, responses were received from 160 (74%). The majority (81%) reported that they employed a Chief AHP or equivalent role, with only 14% of these having a position on the Trust/HB executive board. There were 50 different job titles reported as the titles for the chief AHP or equivalent roles: with director of AHPs (18.6%), lead AHP (13.9%) and chief AHP (11.6%) being the most reported titles. The results identified an inequity of representation of AHP professions within senior AHP leadership; with most of these roles (70%) held by physiotherapists and occupational therapists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in AHP strategic leadership are needed to address the inequities identified in this study. Addressing these issues is required to enable inclusive leadership, which is crucial to improve the contribution of AHPs to healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":"119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the representation of the allied health professions in senior leadership positions in the UK National Health Service.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Eddison, Aoife Healy, Nina Darke, Mary Jones, Millar Leask, Gwen L Roberts, Nachiappan Chockalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/leader-2023-000737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allied health professionals (AHPs) are an important group within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK and make up a large portion of the workforce. Investment in AHP leadership is believed to lead to improvements in patient care, resource use, collaboration and innovation. This study aims to assess the current state of AHP strategic leadership within the NHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A freedom of information (FOI) request was sent to all NHS Trusts and health boards (HBs) within the UK NHS. The questions focused on the AHP workforce, with a particular interest in the chief AHPs (or equivalent roles) working in an NHS setting. Analysis of the FOI used a range of descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 217 Trusts/HBs contacted, responses were received from 160 (74%). The majority (81%) reported that they employed a Chief AHP or equivalent role, with only 14% of these having a position on the Trust/HB executive board. There were 50 different job titles reported as the titles for the chief AHP or equivalent roles: with director of AHPs (18.6%), lead AHP (13.9%) and chief AHP (11.6%) being the most reported titles. The results identified an inequity of representation of AHP professions within senior AHP leadership; with most of these roles (70%) held by physiotherapists and occupational therapists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in AHP strategic leadership are needed to address the inequities identified in this study. Addressing these issues is required to enable inclusive leadership, which is crucial to improve the contribution of AHPs to healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专职医疗人员(AHPs)是英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的一个重要群体,占劳动力的很大一部分。对 AHP 领导力的投资被认为能够改善患者护理、资源利用、协作和创新。本研究旨在评估英国国家医疗服务体系中AHP战略领导力的现状:向英国国家医疗服务体系内的所有国家医疗服务信托机构和卫生局(HBs)发出了信息自由(FOI)申请。问题主要集中在助理医疗保健师队伍,尤其是在国家医疗服务体系中工作的首席助理医疗保健师(或同等职位)。对 FOI 的分析采用了一系列描述性统计方法:在联系的 217 家信托机构/保健机构中,收到了 160 家(74%)的回复。大多数机构(81%)报告说,他们聘用了一名首席辅助医务人员或同等职位人员,其中只有 14% 的人在信托机构/保健机构执行董事会中担任职务。据报告,首席 AHP 或同等职位有 50 种不同的职称:AHPs 主任(18.6%)、AHP 领导(13.9%)和首席 AHP(11.6%)是报告最多的职称。研究结果表明,在高级 AHP 领导层中,AHP 专业的代表性不平等;其中大部分职位(70%)由物理治疗师和职业治疗师担任:结论:需要改变 AHP 战略领导层,以解决本研究中发现的不平等问题。要解决这些问题,就必须实现包容性领导,这对提高 AHP 对医疗保健的贡献至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of the representation of the allied health professions in senior leadership positions in the UK National Health Service.

Background: Allied health professionals (AHPs) are an important group within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK and make up a large portion of the workforce. Investment in AHP leadership is believed to lead to improvements in patient care, resource use, collaboration and innovation. This study aims to assess the current state of AHP strategic leadership within the NHS.

Methods: A freedom of information (FOI) request was sent to all NHS Trusts and health boards (HBs) within the UK NHS. The questions focused on the AHP workforce, with a particular interest in the chief AHPs (or equivalent roles) working in an NHS setting. Analysis of the FOI used a range of descriptive statistics.

Results: Of the 217 Trusts/HBs contacted, responses were received from 160 (74%). The majority (81%) reported that they employed a Chief AHP or equivalent role, with only 14% of these having a position on the Trust/HB executive board. There were 50 different job titles reported as the titles for the chief AHP or equivalent roles: with director of AHPs (18.6%), lead AHP (13.9%) and chief AHP (11.6%) being the most reported titles. The results identified an inequity of representation of AHP professions within senior AHP leadership; with most of these roles (70%) held by physiotherapists and occupational therapists.

Conclusion: Changes in AHP strategic leadership are needed to address the inequities identified in this study. Addressing these issues is required to enable inclusive leadership, which is crucial to improve the contribution of AHPs to healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信