销售价格、社会刚性和第二套住房市场。

Anne-Mette Hjalager, Michael Tophøj Sørensen, Rasmus Nedergård Steffansen, Jan Kloster Staunstrup
{"title":"销售价格、社会刚性和第二套住房市场。","authors":"Anne-Mette Hjalager,&nbsp;Michael Tophøj Sørensen,&nbsp;Rasmus Nedergård Steffansen,&nbsp;Jan Kloster Staunstrup","doi":"10.1007/s10901-023-10047-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Second homes are much valued as recreational resources and also as important commodities on the property market. This study examines the trading patterns and regional price development of Danish second homes from 1992 to 2020. Second home sales volumes and prices reflect the general economic booms and busts and also the possibilities to rent out the property on sharing platforms. However, across regional clusters and over time, property price developments suggest a significant social rigidity in preferences and prospects. The investment and financialization logics and the underlying guiding conspicuous consumption behavior has not changed as an effect of the increased demand during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. When controlling for factors such as house and land plot size, building year, location attractiveness the strong social class and spatial rigidity is reproduced in the data. The shifting of wealth accumulated in the second homes between generations supports the same tendency, and taxation does not rebalance regional effects. Accordingly, only to a limited extent does owning a second home contribute to social equality, even if some second-home owners and policy makers tend to think otherwise. Economic measures in planning and governance portfolios are found to be negligible.</p>","PeriodicalId":73781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sales prices, social rigidity and the second home property market.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Mette Hjalager,&nbsp;Michael Tophøj Sørensen,&nbsp;Rasmus Nedergård Steffansen,&nbsp;Jan Kloster Staunstrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10901-023-10047-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Second homes are much valued as recreational resources and also as important commodities on the property market. This study examines the trading patterns and regional price development of Danish second homes from 1992 to 2020. Second home sales volumes and prices reflect the general economic booms and busts and also the possibilities to rent out the property on sharing platforms. However, across regional clusters and over time, property price developments suggest a significant social rigidity in preferences and prospects. The investment and financialization logics and the underlying guiding conspicuous consumption behavior has not changed as an effect of the increased demand during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. When controlling for factors such as house and land plot size, building year, location attractiveness the strong social class and spatial rigidity is reproduced in the data. The shifting of wealth accumulated in the second homes between generations supports the same tendency, and taxation does not rebalance regional effects. Accordingly, only to a limited extent does owning a second home contribute to social equality, even if some second-home owners and policy makers tend to think otherwise. Economic measures in planning and governance portfolios are found to be negligible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10047-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10047-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二套住房作为娱乐资源和房地产市场上的重要商品非常有价值。本研究考察了1992年至2020年丹麦第二套住房的交易模式和区域价格发展。二套房的销售量和价格反映了总体经济的繁荣和萧条,也反映了在共享平台上出租房产的可能性。然而,随着时间的推移,在各个区域集群中,房地产价格的发展表明,在偏好和前景方面存在着显著的社会刚性。在新冠肺炎大流行的早期阶段,投资和金融化逻辑以及潜在的引导显著消费行为并没有因为需求增加而改变。在控制房屋和地块面积、建筑年份、位置吸引力等因素时,数据中再现了强烈的社会阶层和空间刚性。第二套住房积累的财富在代际之间的转移也支持了同样的趋势,税收并不能重新平衡地区效应。因此,拥有第二套住房对社会平等的贡献只有在有限的程度上,即使一些第二套房屋的拥有者和政策制定者倾向于持相反的看法。规划和治理组合中的经济措施可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sales prices, social rigidity and the second home property market.

Sales prices, social rigidity and the second home property market.

Second homes are much valued as recreational resources and also as important commodities on the property market. This study examines the trading patterns and regional price development of Danish second homes from 1992 to 2020. Second home sales volumes and prices reflect the general economic booms and busts and also the possibilities to rent out the property on sharing platforms. However, across regional clusters and over time, property price developments suggest a significant social rigidity in preferences and prospects. The investment and financialization logics and the underlying guiding conspicuous consumption behavior has not changed as an effect of the increased demand during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. When controlling for factors such as house and land plot size, building year, location attractiveness the strong social class and spatial rigidity is reproduced in the data. The shifting of wealth accumulated in the second homes between generations supports the same tendency, and taxation does not rebalance regional effects. Accordingly, only to a limited extent does owning a second home contribute to social equality, even if some second-home owners and policy makers tend to think otherwise. Economic measures in planning and governance portfolios are found to be negligible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信