墨西哥2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的卫生保健准则和政策:一个卫生不平等的案例

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elysse Bautista-González , Jimena Werner-Sunderland , Paulina Pérez-Duarte Mendiola , Cesar Jeronimo Esquinca-Enríquez-de-la-Fuente , Daniela Bautista-Reyes , Maria Fernanda Maciel-Gutiérrez , Inkel Murguía-Arechiga , Cecilia Vindrola-Padros , Manuel Urbina-Fuentes
{"title":"墨西哥2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的卫生保健准则和政策:一个卫生不平等的案例","authors":"Elysse Bautista-González ,&nbsp;Jimena Werner-Sunderland ,&nbsp;Paulina Pérez-Duarte Mendiola ,&nbsp;Cesar Jeronimo Esquinca-Enríquez-de-la-Fuente ,&nbsp;Daniela Bautista-Reyes ,&nbsp;Maria Fernanda Maciel-Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Inkel Murguía-Arechiga ,&nbsp;Cecilia Vindrola-Padros ,&nbsp;Manuel Urbina-Fuentes","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Heterogeneous government responses have been reported in reaction to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to generate an exploratory review of healthcare policies published during COVID-19 by health-care institutions in Mexico. Analyzing policies within different health sub-systems becomes imperative in the Mexican case due to the longstanding fragmentation of the health-care system and health inequalities.</p></div><div><h3>Data and Methods</h3><p>Policies purposely included in the analysis were published by four public health institutions (IMSS, ISSSTE, SSA and PEMEX) during the COVID-19 epidemic in Mexico (from February 29th to June 15th, 2020) on official institutional websites. Researchers reviewed each document and classified them into seven policy categories set by the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL): public health response, health-care delivery, human resources, health-system infrastructure and supplies, clinical response, health-care management, and epidemiological surveillance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Policy types varied by health institution. The largest number of policies were aimed at public health responses followed by health-care delivery and human resources. Policies were mainly published during the community transmission phase.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pandemic exposed underlying health-care system inequalities and a reactive rather than prepared response to the outbreak. Additionally, this study outlines potential policy gaps and delays in the response that could be avoided in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100025","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-care guidelines and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A case of health-inequalities\",\"authors\":\"Elysse Bautista-González ,&nbsp;Jimena Werner-Sunderland ,&nbsp;Paulina Pérez-Duarte Mendiola ,&nbsp;Cesar Jeronimo Esquinca-Enríquez-de-la-Fuente ,&nbsp;Daniela Bautista-Reyes ,&nbsp;Maria Fernanda Maciel-Gutiérrez ,&nbsp;Inkel Murguía-Arechiga ,&nbsp;Cecilia Vindrola-Padros ,&nbsp;Manuel Urbina-Fuentes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Heterogeneous government responses have been reported in reaction to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to generate an exploratory review of healthcare policies published during COVID-19 by health-care institutions in Mexico. Analyzing policies within different health sub-systems becomes imperative in the Mexican case due to the longstanding fragmentation of the health-care system and health inequalities.</p></div><div><h3>Data and Methods</h3><p>Policies purposely included in the analysis were published by four public health institutions (IMSS, ISSSTE, SSA and PEMEX) during the COVID-19 epidemic in Mexico (from February 29th to June 15th, 2020) on official institutional websites. Researchers reviewed each document and classified them into seven policy categories set by the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL): public health response, health-care delivery, human resources, health-system infrastructure and supplies, clinical response, health-care management, and epidemiological surveillance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Policy types varied by health institution. The largest number of policies were aimed at public health responses followed by health-care delivery and human resources. Policies were mainly published during the community transmission phase.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pandemic exposed underlying health-care system inequalities and a reactive rather than prepared response to the outbreak. Additionally, this study outlines potential policy gaps and delays in the response that could be avoided in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100025\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962030023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962030023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

据报道,政府在应对COVID-19方面采取了不同的应对措施。本研究的目的是对墨西哥卫生保健机构在COVID-19期间发布的卫生保健政策进行探索性审查。在墨西哥的案例中,由于卫生保健系统的长期碎片化和卫生不平等,分析不同卫生子系统内的政策变得势在必行。数据和方法纳入分析的政策由四家公共卫生机构(IMSS、ISSSTE、SSA和PEMEX)在2020年2月29日至6月15日墨西哥COVID-19流行期间(2020年2月29日至6月15日)在官方机构网站上发布。研究人员审查了每份文件,并将其分类为快速研究评估和评价实验室(RREAL)制定的七个政策类别:公共卫生应对、卫生保健提供、人力资源、卫生系统基础设施和供应、临床应对、卫生保健管理和流行病学监测。结果政策类型因医疗机构而异。最多的政策是针对公共卫生对策,其次是提供保健和人力资源。政策主要在社区传播阶段发布。结论此次大流行暴露了卫生保健系统潜在的不平等,以及对疫情采取的是被动而非有准备的应对措施。此外,本研究还概述了未来可以避免的潜在政策空白和应对延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health-care guidelines and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A case of health-inequalities

Health-care guidelines and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A case of health-inequalities

Health-care guidelines and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A case of health-inequalities

Health-care guidelines and policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A case of health-inequalities

Background

Heterogeneous government responses have been reported in reaction to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to generate an exploratory review of healthcare policies published during COVID-19 by health-care institutions in Mexico. Analyzing policies within different health sub-systems becomes imperative in the Mexican case due to the longstanding fragmentation of the health-care system and health inequalities.

Data and Methods

Policies purposely included in the analysis were published by four public health institutions (IMSS, ISSSTE, SSA and PEMEX) during the COVID-19 epidemic in Mexico (from February 29th to June 15th, 2020) on official institutional websites. Researchers reviewed each document and classified them into seven policy categories set by the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL): public health response, health-care delivery, human resources, health-system infrastructure and supplies, clinical response, health-care management, and epidemiological surveillance.

Results

Policy types varied by health institution. The largest number of policies were aimed at public health responses followed by health-care delivery and human resources. Policies were mainly published during the community transmission phase.

Conclusions

The pandemic exposed underlying health-care system inequalities and a reactive rather than prepared response to the outbreak. Additionally, this study outlines potential policy gaps and delays in the response that could be avoided in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信