建设提供肿瘤学财务宣传的组织能力。

Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19
Meredith Doherty, Jessica Jacoby, Amy Copeland, Christina Mangir, Rifeta Kajdic Hodzic, Tamara J Cadet
{"title":"建设提供肿瘤学财务宣传的组织能力。","authors":"Meredith Doherty, Jessica Jacoby, Amy Copeland, Christina Mangir, Rifeta Kajdic Hodzic, Tamara J Cadet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related financial hardship is linked to poor health outcomes and early mortality. Oncology financial advocacy (OFA) aims to prevent cancer-related financial hardship in oncology settings by assessing patients' needs and connecting them to available financial resources. Despite promising evidence, OFA remains underutilized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe oncology financial advocates' perceptions about the challenges to and opportunities for implementing oncology financial advocacy (OFA) in community cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine virtual focus groups were conducted with 45 oncology financial advocates. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using template-based thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); two study team members coded each transcript and all six team members identified emergent themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Salient themes were identified across all five domains of the CFIR framework: (1) intervention characteristics: participants described challenges of adapting OFA to meet the needs of the medical system instead of needs of the patients; (2) outer setting: growing awareness of health and cancer disparities could bring more attention to and investment in OFA; (3) inner setting: programs are under-resourced to assist all at-risk patients, staffing, technology integration, and network/communication workflows are needed; (4) characteristics of individuals: advocates believe strongly in the effectiveness and would like to see their credibility enhanced with professional certification; (5) process: implementation strategies that target the engagement of leadership, key stakeholders, and patients to increase program reach are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OFA cannot reach all at-risk patients because of understaffing, poor communication between departments, and a lack of understanding OFA as an intervention among colleagues, key stakeholders, and patients. To reach full implementation, advocates need assistance in making the case for more resources, research on patient outcomes, professional certification, and the use of policy to incentivize financial advocacy as a standard of care in medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":73875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship","volume":"14 7","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Organizational Capacity to Deliver Oncology Financial Advocacy.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Doherty, Jessica Jacoby, Amy Copeland, Christina Mangir, Rifeta Kajdic Hodzic, Tamara J Cadet\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related financial hardship is linked to poor health outcomes and early mortality. Oncology financial advocacy (OFA) aims to prevent cancer-related financial hardship in oncology settings by assessing patients' needs and connecting them to available financial resources. Despite promising evidence, OFA remains underutilized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe oncology financial advocates' perceptions about the challenges to and opportunities for implementing oncology financial advocacy (OFA) in community cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine virtual focus groups were conducted with 45 oncology financial advocates. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using template-based thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); two study team members coded each transcript and all six team members identified emergent themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Salient themes were identified across all five domains of the CFIR framework: (1) intervention characteristics: participants described challenges of adapting OFA to meet the needs of the medical system instead of needs of the patients; (2) outer setting: growing awareness of health and cancer disparities could bring more attention to and investment in OFA; (3) inner setting: programs are under-resourced to assist all at-risk patients, staffing, technology integration, and network/communication workflows are needed; (4) characteristics of individuals: advocates believe strongly in the effectiveness and would like to see their credibility enhanced with professional certification; (5) process: implementation strategies that target the engagement of leadership, key stakeholders, and patients to increase program reach are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OFA cannot reach all at-risk patients because of understaffing, poor communication between departments, and a lack of understanding OFA as an intervention among colleagues, key stakeholders, and patients. To reach full implementation, advocates need assistance in making the case for more resources, research on patient outcomes, professional certification, and the use of policy to incentivize financial advocacy as a standard of care in medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与癌症相关的经济困难与不良的健康结果和早期死亡率有关。肿瘤财务倡导(OFA)旨在通过评估患者的需求并将他们与可用的财务资源联系起来,从而预防肿瘤环境中与癌症相关的财务困难。尽管证据确凿,但肿瘤财务倡导仍未得到充分利用:描述肿瘤财务倡导者对在社区癌症中心实施肿瘤财务倡导(OFA)的挑战和机遇的看法:方法:对 45 名肿瘤财务倡导者进行了九次虚拟焦点小组讨论。在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的指导下,采用基于模板的主题分析法对焦点小组记录进行了分析;两名研究小组成员对每份记录进行了编码,所有六名小组成员确定了新出现的主题:结果:在 CFIR 框架的所有五个领域中都确定了突出主题:(1)干预特点:参与者描述了调整 OFA 以满足医疗系统需求而非患者需求所面临的挑战;(2)外部环境:人们对健康和癌症差异的认识不断提高,这将使 OFA 得到更多关注和投资;(3)内部环境:项目资源不足,无法为所有高危患者提供帮助,因此需要人员配备、技术整合以及网络/通信工作流程;(4)个人特点:倡导者坚信项目的有效性,并希望通过专业认证提高他们的可信度;(5)过程:需要针对领导层、主要利益相关者和患者的参与制定实施策略,以扩大项目的覆盖范围。结论:由于人手不足、部门之间沟通不畅,以及同事、主要利益相关者和患者对 OFA 这一干预措施缺乏了解,OFA 无法覆盖所有高危患者。为了全面实施该计划,倡导者需要得到帮助,以争取更多的资源、对患者的治疗效果进行研究、获得专业认证,并利用政策激励将财务倡导作为医疗护理的一项标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Organizational Capacity to Deliver Oncology Financial Advocacy.

Background: Cancer-related financial hardship is linked to poor health outcomes and early mortality. Oncology financial advocacy (OFA) aims to prevent cancer-related financial hardship in oncology settings by assessing patients' needs and connecting them to available financial resources. Despite promising evidence, OFA remains underutilized.

Objectives: Describe oncology financial advocates' perceptions about the challenges to and opportunities for implementing oncology financial advocacy (OFA) in community cancer centers.

Methods: Nine virtual focus groups were conducted with 45 oncology financial advocates. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using template-based thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); two study team members coded each transcript and all six team members identified emergent themes.

Results: Salient themes were identified across all five domains of the CFIR framework: (1) intervention characteristics: participants described challenges of adapting OFA to meet the needs of the medical system instead of needs of the patients; (2) outer setting: growing awareness of health and cancer disparities could bring more attention to and investment in OFA; (3) inner setting: programs are under-resourced to assist all at-risk patients, staffing, technology integration, and network/communication workflows are needed; (4) characteristics of individuals: advocates believe strongly in the effectiveness and would like to see their credibility enhanced with professional certification; (5) process: implementation strategies that target the engagement of leadership, key stakeholders, and patients to increase program reach are needed.

Conclusions: OFA cannot reach all at-risk patients because of understaffing, poor communication between departments, and a lack of understanding OFA as an intervention among colleagues, key stakeholders, and patients. To reach full implementation, advocates need assistance in making the case for more resources, research on patient outcomes, professional certification, and the use of policy to incentivize financial advocacy as a standard of care in medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信