移动正念治疗新冠肺炎一线护士心理困扰和精疲力竭:一项随机试验。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Elias H Pratt, Levant Hall, Christina Jennings, Maren K Olsen, Adina Jan, Alice Parish, Laura S Porter, Christopher E Cox
{"title":"移动正念治疗新冠肺炎一线护士心理困扰和精疲力竭:一项随机试验。","authors":"Elias H Pratt,&nbsp;Levant Hall,&nbsp;Christina Jennings,&nbsp;Maren K Olsen,&nbsp;Adina Jan,&nbsp;Alice Parish,&nbsp;Laura S Porter,&nbsp;Christopher E Cox","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated psychological distress and burnout in frontline healthcare workers. Interventions addressing psychological distress and burnout among these workers are lacking. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine the feasibility and explore the impact of mobile mindfulness to treat psychological distress and burnout among nurses in frontline COVID-19 units. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a pilot randomized trial of 102 nurses working in COVID-19 units at a single hospital between May 2021 and January 2022. Participants were randomized to mobile mindfulness (intervention) or waiting list (control). The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by comparing rates of randomization, retention, and intervention completion to predefined targets. Secondary outcomes were changes in psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Perceived Stress Scale-4) and burnout symptoms (Maslach Burnout Inventory) after 1 month. <b>Results:</b> We randomized 102 of 113 consented individuals (90%, target 80%), and 88 completed follow-up (86%, target 80%). Among 69 intervention participants, 19 completed ⩾1 mindfulness session per week (28%, target 60%), and 13 completed ⩾75% of mindfulness sessions (19%, target 50%). Intervention participants had greater decreases in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores than control subjects (difference in differences, -2.21; 95% confidence interval, -3.99, -0.42; <i>P</i> = 0.016), but the Maslach Burnout Inventory depersonalization scores decreased more in the control arm than in the intervention arm (difference in differences, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.18, 3.02; <i>P</i> = 0.027). There were no other changes in emotional distress or burnout symptoms. <b>Conclusions:</b> This trial of mobile mindfulness in frontline nurses met feasibility targets for randomization and retention, but participants had modest intervention use. Intervention participants had a reduction in depression symptoms, but not in burnout. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04816708).</p>","PeriodicalId":8018,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1475-1482"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/59/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC.PMC10559143.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Mindfulness for Psychological Distress and Burnout among Frontline COVID-19 Nurses: A Pilot Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elias H Pratt,&nbsp;Levant Hall,&nbsp;Christina Jennings,&nbsp;Maren K Olsen,&nbsp;Adina Jan,&nbsp;Alice Parish,&nbsp;Laura S Porter,&nbsp;Christopher E Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated psychological distress and burnout in frontline healthcare workers. Interventions addressing psychological distress and burnout among these workers are lacking. <b>Objectives:</b> To determine the feasibility and explore the impact of mobile mindfulness to treat psychological distress and burnout among nurses in frontline COVID-19 units. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a pilot randomized trial of 102 nurses working in COVID-19 units at a single hospital between May 2021 and January 2022. Participants were randomized to mobile mindfulness (intervention) or waiting list (control). The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by comparing rates of randomization, retention, and intervention completion to predefined targets. Secondary outcomes were changes in psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Perceived Stress Scale-4) and burnout symptoms (Maslach Burnout Inventory) after 1 month. <b>Results:</b> We randomized 102 of 113 consented individuals (90%, target 80%), and 88 completed follow-up (86%, target 80%). Among 69 intervention participants, 19 completed ⩾1 mindfulness session per week (28%, target 60%), and 13 completed ⩾75% of mindfulness sessions (19%, target 50%). Intervention participants had greater decreases in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores than control subjects (difference in differences, -2.21; 95% confidence interval, -3.99, -0.42; <i>P</i> = 0.016), but the Maslach Burnout Inventory depersonalization scores decreased more in the control arm than in the intervention arm (difference in differences, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.18, 3.02; <i>P</i> = 0.027). There were no other changes in emotional distress or burnout symptoms. <b>Conclusions:</b> This trial of mobile mindfulness in frontline nurses met feasibility targets for randomization and retention, but participants had modest intervention use. Intervention participants had a reduction in depression symptoms, but not in burnout. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04816708).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1475-1482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/59/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC.PMC10559143.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

理由:冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行加剧了一线医护人员的心理困扰和倦怠。缺乏针对这些工人的心理困扰和倦怠的干预措施。目的:确定移动正念治疗新冠肺炎一线护士心理困扰和倦怠的可行性并探讨其影响。方法:我们对2021年5月至2022年1月期间在一家医院新冠肺炎病房工作的102名护士进行了一项试点随机试验。参与者被随机分配到移动正念(干预)或等待名单(对照)。主要结果是可行性,通过将随机化、保留率和干预完成率与预定义目标进行比较来评估。次要结果是1个月后心理困扰(患者健康问卷-9、一般焦虑障碍-7、感知压力量表-4)和倦怠症状(Maslach倦怠量表)的变化。结果:我们将113名患者中的102人(90%,目标80%)随机分组,88人完成随访(86%,目标80%。在69名干预参与者中,19人每周完成1次正念(28%,目标60%),13人完成75%的正念(19%,目标50%)。干预组受试者的患者健康问卷-9分的下降幅度大于对照组(差异为-2.21;95%置信区间为-3.99,-0.42;P = 0.016),但对照组的Maslach倦怠量表人格解体评分下降幅度大于干预组(差异1.60;95%置信区间0.183.02;P = 0.027)。情绪困扰或倦怠症状没有其他变化。结论:这项在一线护士中进行的移动正念试验达到了随机化和保留的可行性目标,但参与者的干预作用不大。干预参与者的抑郁症状有所减轻,但倦怠症状没有减轻。在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册的临床试验(NCT04816708)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mobile Mindfulness for Psychological Distress and Burnout among Frontline COVID-19 Nurses: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Mobile Mindfulness for Psychological Distress and Burnout among Frontline COVID-19 Nurses: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Mobile Mindfulness for Psychological Distress and Burnout among Frontline COVID-19 Nurses: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Rationale: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated psychological distress and burnout in frontline healthcare workers. Interventions addressing psychological distress and burnout among these workers are lacking. Objectives: To determine the feasibility and explore the impact of mobile mindfulness to treat psychological distress and burnout among nurses in frontline COVID-19 units. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized trial of 102 nurses working in COVID-19 units at a single hospital between May 2021 and January 2022. Participants were randomized to mobile mindfulness (intervention) or waiting list (control). The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by comparing rates of randomization, retention, and intervention completion to predefined targets. Secondary outcomes were changes in psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Perceived Stress Scale-4) and burnout symptoms (Maslach Burnout Inventory) after 1 month. Results: We randomized 102 of 113 consented individuals (90%, target 80%), and 88 completed follow-up (86%, target 80%). Among 69 intervention participants, 19 completed ⩾1 mindfulness session per week (28%, target 60%), and 13 completed ⩾75% of mindfulness sessions (19%, target 50%). Intervention participants had greater decreases in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores than control subjects (difference in differences, -2.21; 95% confidence interval, -3.99, -0.42; P = 0.016), but the Maslach Burnout Inventory depersonalization scores decreased more in the control arm than in the intervention arm (difference in differences, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.18, 3.02; P = 0.027). There were no other changes in emotional distress or burnout symptoms. Conclusions: This trial of mobile mindfulness in frontline nurses met feasibility targets for randomization and retention, but participants had modest intervention use. Intervention participants had a reduction in depression symptoms, but not in burnout. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04816708).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of the American Thoracic Society (AnnalsATS) is the official international online journal of the American Thoracic Society. Formerly known as PATS, it provides comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a wide range of topics in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine, respiratory sleep medicine, and adult medical critical care. As a leading journal in its field, AnnalsATS offers up-to-date and reliable information that is directly applicable to clinical practice. It serves as a valuable resource for clinical specialists, supporting their formative and continuing education. Additionally, the journal is committed to promoting public health by publishing research and articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信