Helen Hawley-Hague, Ashley Gluchowski, Reena Lasrado, Ellen Martinez, Shehnaz Akhtar, Emma Stanmore, Sarah Tyson
{"title":"探索在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供远程物理治疗：英国范围内的服务评估。","authors":"Helen Hawley-Hague, Ashley Gluchowski, Reena Lasrado, Ellen Martinez, Shehnaz Akhtar, Emma Stanmore, Sarah Tyson","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2247069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, physiotherapists changed rapidly to working remotely. Research demonstrates the benefits of remote physiotherapy, but little is known about its implementation in practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Explore the take-up and delivery of remote physiotherapy during the pandemic in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential mixed methods evaluation with physiotherapists leading remote physiotherapy delivery. Two-stage approach included online survey (2020) and semi-structured interviews with documentary/data analysis (2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1620 physiotherapists who completed the survey. The most used devices were telephone (<i>n</i> = 942,71.0%) and the AttendAnywhere platform (<i>n</i> = 511, 38.5%). Remote consultations were frequently used for initial assessment (<i>n</i> = 1105, 83%), screening/triage (<i>n</i> = 882, 67%), or to review, monitor, and progress treatment (<i>n</i> = 982-1004, 74%-76%). Qualitative survey responses reflected respondents' response to COVID-19 and delivery of remote physiotherapy. Twelve remote physiotherapy leads were then purposively sampled across clinical areas. Three main themes emerged from interviews: response to Covid-19, delivery of remote physiotherapy, and future of remote physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote physiotherapy was safe, feasible, and acceptable for those who accessed it. There were patients for which it was deemed unsuitable across clinical areas. In practice, it should be combined with in-person consultation based on patients' needs/preferences. Further research should explore post-pandemic maintenance of remote delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the delivery of remote physiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: UK wide service evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Hawley-Hague, Ashley Gluchowski, Reena Lasrado, Ellen Martinez, Shehnaz Akhtar, Emma Stanmore, Sarah Tyson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2247069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, physiotherapists changed rapidly to working remotely. Research demonstrates the benefits of remote physiotherapy, but little is known about its implementation in practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Explore the take-up and delivery of remote physiotherapy during the pandemic in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential mixed methods evaluation with physiotherapists leading remote physiotherapy delivery. Two-stage approach included online survey (2020) and semi-structured interviews with documentary/data analysis (2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1620 physiotherapists who completed the survey. The most used devices were telephone (<i>n</i> = 942,71.0%) and the AttendAnywhere platform (<i>n</i> = 511, 38.5%). Remote consultations were frequently used for initial assessment (<i>n</i> = 1105, 83%), screening/triage (<i>n</i> = 882, 67%), or to review, monitor, and progress treatment (<i>n</i> = 982-1004, 74%-76%). Qualitative survey responses reflected respondents' response to COVID-19 and delivery of remote physiotherapy. Twelve remote physiotherapy leads were then purposively sampled across clinical areas. Three main themes emerged from interviews: response to Covid-19, delivery of remote physiotherapy, and future of remote physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote physiotherapy was safe, feasible, and acceptable for those who accessed it. There were patients for which it was deemed unsuitable across clinical areas. In practice, it should be combined with in-person consultation based on patients' needs/preferences. Further research should explore post-pandemic maintenance of remote delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2247069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2247069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the delivery of remote physiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: UK wide service evaluation.
Introduction: During the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, physiotherapists changed rapidly to working remotely. Research demonstrates the benefits of remote physiotherapy, but little is known about its implementation in practice.
Purpose: Explore the take-up and delivery of remote physiotherapy during the pandemic in the United Kingdom.
Methods: Sequential mixed methods evaluation with physiotherapists leading remote physiotherapy delivery. Two-stage approach included online survey (2020) and semi-structured interviews with documentary/data analysis (2021).
Results: There were 1620 physiotherapists who completed the survey. The most used devices were telephone (n = 942,71.0%) and the AttendAnywhere platform (n = 511, 38.5%). Remote consultations were frequently used for initial assessment (n = 1105, 83%), screening/triage (n = 882, 67%), or to review, monitor, and progress treatment (n = 982-1004, 74%-76%). Qualitative survey responses reflected respondents' response to COVID-19 and delivery of remote physiotherapy. Twelve remote physiotherapy leads were then purposively sampled across clinical areas. Three main themes emerged from interviews: response to Covid-19, delivery of remote physiotherapy, and future of remote physiotherapy.
Conclusion: Remote physiotherapy was safe, feasible, and acceptable for those who accessed it. There were patients for which it was deemed unsuitable across clinical areas. In practice, it should be combined with in-person consultation based on patients' needs/preferences. Further research should explore post-pandemic maintenance of remote delivery.
期刊介绍：
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
