21世纪迷幻科学

Nahuel Enrique Baca
{"title":"21世纪迷幻科学","authors":"Nahuel Enrique Baca","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v34i160.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We are currently witnessing a renaissance of psychedelic science in clinical research. In Argentina, the challenges related to its study and the development of new treatments in the field of Psychiatry are subject to the adoption of certain regulatory policies. The evolution of the knowledge about the effects, mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of serotonergic psychedelics warrants a change in the regulatory framework for their use in clinical research. In a world that demands rapid flexibility and adaptation, we should avoid waiting for advances from developed countries. It is evident\nthat psychopharmacological progress in the last thirty years have not been up to the expectations of the so-called \"decade of the brain\". Aware of these limitations, in this paper we carry out a historical and ethnopharmacological review of the classic psychedelics, from the 50's to the present -without ignoring their ancestral uses-, in order to highlight the political and cultural controversies that these molecules have raised in the field of Psychiatry. We hope to promote in the local environment an approach devoid of stigmas and that considers the therapeutic potential of these substances,\nwith the ultimate goal of providing relief to severe mental illnesses that to this day continue to remain unanswered.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"34 160, abr.-jun.","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"21st Century Psychedelic Science\",\"authors\":\"Nahuel Enrique Baca\",\"doi\":\"10.53680/vertex.v34i160.461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We are currently witnessing a renaissance of psychedelic science in clinical research. In Argentina, the challenges related to its study and the development of new treatments in the field of Psychiatry are subject to the adoption of certain regulatory policies. The evolution of the knowledge about the effects, mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of serotonergic psychedelics warrants a change in the regulatory framework for their use in clinical research. In a world that demands rapid flexibility and adaptation, we should avoid waiting for advances from developed countries. It is evident\\nthat psychopharmacological progress in the last thirty years have not been up to the expectations of the so-called \\\"decade of the brain\\\". Aware of these limitations, in this paper we carry out a historical and ethnopharmacological review of the classic psychedelics, from the 50's to the present -without ignoring their ancestral uses-, in order to highlight the political and cultural controversies that these molecules have raised in the field of Psychiatry. We hope to promote in the local environment an approach devoid of stigmas and that considers the therapeutic potential of these substances,\\nwith the ultimate goal of providing relief to severe mental illnesses that to this day continue to remain unanswered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)\",\"volume\":\"34 160, abr.-jun.\",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v34i160.461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v34i160.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们正在目睹迷幻剂科学在临床研究中的复兴。在阿根廷,与精神病学领域的研究和发展新疗法有关的挑战取决于采取某些管制政策。关于5 -羟色胺类致幻剂的作用、作用机制和治疗潜力的知识的发展,保证了其在临床研究中使用的监管框架的改变。在一个要求迅速灵活和适应的世界中,我们应该避免等待发达国家的进步。很明显,过去三十年的精神药理学进展并没有达到所谓“大脑十年”的预期。意识到这些局限性,在本文中,我们对从50年代到现在的经典迷幻药进行了历史和民族药理学回顾-不忽视它们的祖先用途-以突出这些分子在精神病学领域引起的政治和文化争议。我们希望在当地环境中推广一种没有耻辱感的方法,并考虑到这些物质的治疗潜力,最终目标是为迄今仍未得到解答的严重精神疾病提供缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
21st Century Psychedelic Science

We are currently witnessing a renaissance of psychedelic science in clinical research. In Argentina, the challenges related to its study and the development of new treatments in the field of Psychiatry are subject to the adoption of certain regulatory policies. The evolution of the knowledge about the effects, mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of serotonergic psychedelics warrants a change in the regulatory framework for their use in clinical research. In a world that demands rapid flexibility and adaptation, we should avoid waiting for advances from developed countries. It is evident that psychopharmacological progress in the last thirty years have not been up to the expectations of the so-called "decade of the brain". Aware of these limitations, in this paper we carry out a historical and ethnopharmacological review of the classic psychedelics, from the 50's to the present -without ignoring their ancestral uses-, in order to highlight the political and cultural controversies that these molecules have raised in the field of Psychiatry. We hope to promote in the local environment an approach devoid of stigmas and that considers the therapeutic potential of these substances, with the ultimate goal of providing relief to severe mental illnesses that to this day continue to remain unanswered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信