Haoran Li, Wen Luo, Eunkyeng Baek, Christopher G Thompson, Kwok Hap Lam
{"title":"用计数和比例数据进行单例研究的多层次建模:论证和评价。","authors":"Haoran Li, Wen Luo, Eunkyeng Baek, Christopher G Thompson, Kwok Hap Lam","doi":"10.1037/met0000607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The outcomes in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are often counts or proportions. In our study, we provided a colloquial illustration for a new class of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to fit count and proportion data from SCEDs. We also addressed important aspects in the GLMM framework including overdispersion, estimation methods, statistical inferences, model selection methods by detecting overdispersion, and interpretations of regression coefficients. We then demonstrated the GLMMs with two empirical examples with count and proportion outcomes in SCEDs. In addition, we conducted simulation studies to examine the performance of GLMMs in terms of biases and coverage rates for the immediate treatment effect and treatment effect on the trend. We also examined the empirical Type I error rates of statistical tests. Finally, we provided recommendations about how to make sound statistical decisions to use GLMMs based on the findings from simulation studies. Our hope is that this article will provide SCED researchers with the basic information necessary to conduct appropriate statistical analysis of count and proportion data in their own research and outline the future agenda for methodologists to explore the full potential of GLMMs to analyze or meta-analyze SCED data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":"815-842"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilevel modeling in single-case studies with count and proportion data: A demonstration and evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Haoran Li, Wen Luo, Eunkyeng Baek, Christopher G Thompson, Kwok Hap Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The outcomes in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are often counts or proportions. In our study, we provided a colloquial illustration for a new class of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to fit count and proportion data from SCEDs. We also addressed important aspects in the GLMM framework including overdispersion, estimation methods, statistical inferences, model selection methods by detecting overdispersion, and interpretations of regression coefficients. We then demonstrated the GLMMs with two empirical examples with count and proportion outcomes in SCEDs. In addition, we conducted simulation studies to examine the performance of GLMMs in terms of biases and coverage rates for the immediate treatment effect and treatment effect on the trend. We also examined the empirical Type I error rates of statistical tests. Finally, we provided recommendations about how to make sound statistical decisions to use GLMMs based on the findings from simulation studies. Our hope is that this article will provide SCED researchers with the basic information necessary to conduct appropriate statistical analysis of count and proportion data in their own research and outline the future agenda for methodologists to explore the full potential of GLMMs to analyze or meta-analyze SCED data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"815-842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000607\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000607","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
单例实验设计(SCEDs)的结果通常是计数或比例。在我们的研究中,我们为一类新的广义线性混合模型(glmm)提供了一个通俗的说明,以拟合来自SCEDs的计数和比例数据。我们还讨论了GLMM框架中的重要方面,包括过分散、估计方法、统计推断、通过检测过分散来选择模型的方法以及回归系数的解释。然后,我们用两个实证例子证明了glmm在sced中的计数和比例结果。此外,我们还进行了模拟研究,以检验glmm在即时治疗效果和治疗效果对趋势的偏差和覆盖率方面的表现。我们还检验了统计检验的经验I型错误率。最后,我们根据模拟研究的结果,就如何做出合理的统计决策来使用glmm提出了建议。我们希望本文能为经济与经济发展研究人员提供必要的基本信息,以便他们在自己的研究中对计数和比例数据进行适当的统计分析,并概述方法学家未来的议程,以探索glmm分析或元分析经济与经济发展数据的全部潜力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Multilevel modeling in single-case studies with count and proportion data: A demonstration and evaluation.
The outcomes in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are often counts or proportions. In our study, we provided a colloquial illustration for a new class of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to fit count and proportion data from SCEDs. We also addressed important aspects in the GLMM framework including overdispersion, estimation methods, statistical inferences, model selection methods by detecting overdispersion, and interpretations of regression coefficients. We then demonstrated the GLMMs with two empirical examples with count and proportion outcomes in SCEDs. In addition, we conducted simulation studies to examine the performance of GLMMs in terms of biases and coverage rates for the immediate treatment effect and treatment effect on the trend. We also examined the empirical Type I error rates of statistical tests. Finally, we provided recommendations about how to make sound statistical decisions to use GLMMs based on the findings from simulation studies. Our hope is that this article will provide SCED researchers with the basic information necessary to conduct appropriate statistical analysis of count and proportion data in their own research and outline the future agenda for methodologists to explore the full potential of GLMMs to analyze or meta-analyze SCED data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.