有证据表明,特定的人际关系会诱发适应不良的人格表现。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2023.2225034
Rae Lutz, Brian Lakey
{"title":"有证据表明,特定的人际关系会诱发适应不良的人格表现。","authors":"Rae Lutz, Brian Lakey","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2023.2225034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research applied relational regulation theory (RRT) to maladaptive personality as identified in the DSM-5, dimension trait model. RRT describes how individual social network members help people regulate their own affect, thought and action. Previous research found that people expressed different levels of normal personality dimensions and affect depending upon the network members that people were with or thinking about.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>College students (<i>N</i> = 719) rated their expression of maladaptive dimensions and affect when with important network members, as well as the interpersonal characteristics of network members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People's maladaptive personality expression was strongly consistent across network members (recipient effects). Yet, personality expression also varied strongly depending upon which network member the recipient was with or thinking about (dyadic effects). PID-5 negative affectivity and PANAS negative affect more strongly reflected dyads than recipients. Antagonism and disinhibition more strongly reflected recipients than dyads. Network members who evoked maladaptive expressions were seen by recipients as unsupportive, unresponsive, as evoking conflict, attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety. However, the interpersonal constructs were mostly redundant in predicting maladaptive personality. Findings were replicated across random subsamples and gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings provide evidence that important personal relationships can evoke the expression of maladaptive personality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"205-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence that specific personal relationships evoke maladaptive personality expression.\",\"authors\":\"Rae Lutz, Brian Lakey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2023.2225034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research applied relational regulation theory (RRT) to maladaptive personality as identified in the DSM-5, dimension trait model. RRT describes how individual social network members help people regulate their own affect, thought and action. Previous research found that people expressed different levels of normal personality dimensions and affect depending upon the network members that people were with or thinking about.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>College students (<i>N</i> = 719) rated their expression of maladaptive dimensions and affect when with important network members, as well as the interpersonal characteristics of network members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People's maladaptive personality expression was strongly consistent across network members (recipient effects). Yet, personality expression also varied strongly depending upon which network member the recipient was with or thinking about (dyadic effects). PID-5 negative affectivity and PANAS negative affect more strongly reflected dyads than recipients. Antagonism and disinhibition more strongly reflected recipients than dyads. Network members who evoked maladaptive expressions were seen by recipients as unsupportive, unresponsive, as evoking conflict, attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety. However, the interpersonal constructs were mostly redundant in predicting maladaptive personality. Findings were replicated across random subsamples and gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings provide evidence that important personal relationships can evoke the expression of maladaptive personality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"205-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2225034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2225034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究将关系调节理论(RRT)应用于 DSM-5 维度特质模型中确定的适应不良人格。关系调节理论描述了个体社会网络成员如何帮助人们调节自己的情感、思想和行为。以前的研究发现,人们会根据与之相处或思考的网络成员的不同,表现出不同程度的正常人格维度和情感:方法:大学生(719 人)对他们与重要网络成员在一起时的不适应性人格维度和情感表达,以及网络成员的人际关系特征进行评分:不同网络成员的适应不良人格表现具有很强的一致性(接受者效应)。然而,受试者的人格表现也会因与哪位网络成员在一起或想到哪位网络成员而产生强烈的差异(二元效应)。PID-5 消极情绪和 PANAS 消极情绪比接受者更能反映出二人关系。对立情绪和抑制情绪对受试者的反映比对立情绪对受试者的反映更强烈。在受助者看来,引起不适应表达的网络成员是不支持、不回应、引起冲突、依恋回避和依恋焦虑的。然而,在预测适应不良人格方面,人际关系建构大多是多余的。研究结果在随机子样本和性别中得到了重复:研究结果证明,重要的人际关系会诱发适应不良型人格的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence that specific personal relationships evoke maladaptive personality expression.

Introduction: This research applied relational regulation theory (RRT) to maladaptive personality as identified in the DSM-5, dimension trait model. RRT describes how individual social network members help people regulate their own affect, thought and action. Previous research found that people expressed different levels of normal personality dimensions and affect depending upon the network members that people were with or thinking about.

Methods: College students (N = 719) rated their expression of maladaptive dimensions and affect when with important network members, as well as the interpersonal characteristics of network members.

Results: People's maladaptive personality expression was strongly consistent across network members (recipient effects). Yet, personality expression also varied strongly depending upon which network member the recipient was with or thinking about (dyadic effects). PID-5 negative affectivity and PANAS negative affect more strongly reflected dyads than recipients. Antagonism and disinhibition more strongly reflected recipients than dyads. Network members who evoked maladaptive expressions were seen by recipients as unsupportive, unresponsive, as evoking conflict, attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety. However, the interpersonal constructs were mostly redundant in predicting maladaptive personality. Findings were replicated across random subsamples and gender.

Conclusion: The findings provide evidence that important personal relationships can evoke the expression of maladaptive personality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信