儿科居家临终关怀。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Signe Hoff Kobborg Larsen, Inger Bording, Margit Bjergegaard, Jakob Buchreitz, Bente Toth Mouritzen, Lotte Brix, Bodil Abild Jespersen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard
{"title":"儿科居家临终关怀。","authors":"Signe Hoff Kobborg Larsen,&nbsp;Inger Bording,&nbsp;Margit Bjergegaard,&nbsp;Jakob Buchreitz,&nbsp;Bente Toth Mouritzen,&nbsp;Lotte Brix,&nbsp;Bodil Abild Jespersen,&nbsp;Mette Asbjoern Neergaard","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.6.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A terminally ill child should have the possibility to be at home with their family during the end of life. Provision of care from primary care nurses (PCNs) is crucial, but no model exists on how specialised paediatric palliative care teams (SPPCTs) support the PCNs to perform this task.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how PCNs evaluated a shared care model between a SPPCT and PCNs in paediatric end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 23-item questionnaire was distributed to PCNs involved in care of 14 terminally ill children in November 2019 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 20 questionnaires were returned from nurses who agreed/completely agreed that an introductory meeting made them better prepared (78.9%) to deal with the death of a child in their care, cooperating with family members (70.6%) and dealing with own emotions (73.7%). A total of 69.2% felt the meeting helped coping with parents' pressure and 88.9% stated that the trajectory changed how they saw themselves involved in future paediatric palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shared care model was evaluated positively. Clear agreements and specialist support were prerequisites for good trajectories at the end of life. Further research is needed to investigate if the shared care model optimises palliative care and security in relation to child and family.</p>","PeriodicalId":47415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","volume":"29 6","pages":"282-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paediatric end-of-life care at home.\",\"authors\":\"Signe Hoff Kobborg Larsen,&nbsp;Inger Bording,&nbsp;Margit Bjergegaard,&nbsp;Jakob Buchreitz,&nbsp;Bente Toth Mouritzen,&nbsp;Lotte Brix,&nbsp;Bodil Abild Jespersen,&nbsp;Mette Asbjoern Neergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.6.282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A terminally ill child should have the possibility to be at home with their family during the end of life. Provision of care from primary care nurses (PCNs) is crucial, but no model exists on how specialised paediatric palliative care teams (SPPCTs) support the PCNs to perform this task.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how PCNs evaluated a shared care model between a SPPCT and PCNs in paediatric end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 23-item questionnaire was distributed to PCNs involved in care of 14 terminally ill children in November 2019 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 20 questionnaires were returned from nurses who agreed/completely agreed that an introductory meeting made them better prepared (78.9%) to deal with the death of a child in their care, cooperating with family members (70.6%) and dealing with own emotions (73.7%). A total of 69.2% felt the meeting helped coping with parents' pressure and 88.9% stated that the trajectory changed how they saw themselves involved in future paediatric palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shared care model was evaluated positively. Clear agreements and specialist support were prerequisites for good trajectories at the end of life. Further research is needed to investigate if the shared care model optimises palliative care and security in relation to child and family.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Palliative Nursing\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"282-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Palliative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.6.282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.6.282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一个身患绝症的孩子应该有可能在生命的最后时刻呆在家里和家人在一起。初级保健护士(pcn)提供护理是至关重要的,但目前还没有专门的儿科姑息治疗小组(sppct)如何支持pcn执行这项任务的模式。目的:研究pcn如何评估SPPCT和pcn在儿科临终关怀中的共享护理模式。方法:于2019年11月和2020年1月对14名临终儿童的护理人员进行问卷调查。采用描述性统计。结果:共收到20份问卷,受访护士同意或完全同意介绍会使她们更好地准备(78.9%)处理所照顾的儿童死亡、与家属合作(70.6%)和处理自己的情绪(73.7%)。共有69.2%的人认为会议有助于应对父母的压力,88.9%的人表示,这次会议改变了他们对自己参与未来儿科姑息治疗的看法。结论:对共享护理模式给予积极评价。明确的协议和专家支持是生命结束时良好轨迹的先决条件。需要进一步的研究来调查是否共享护理模式优化姑息治疗和安全有关的儿童和家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paediatric end-of-life care at home.

Background: A terminally ill child should have the possibility to be at home with their family during the end of life. Provision of care from primary care nurses (PCNs) is crucial, but no model exists on how specialised paediatric palliative care teams (SPPCTs) support the PCNs to perform this task.

Aim: To investigate how PCNs evaluated a shared care model between a SPPCT and PCNs in paediatric end-of-life care.

Method: A 23-item questionnaire was distributed to PCNs involved in care of 14 terminally ill children in November 2019 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics were used.

Findings: A total of 20 questionnaires were returned from nurses who agreed/completely agreed that an introductory meeting made them better prepared (78.9%) to deal with the death of a child in their care, cooperating with family members (70.6%) and dealing with own emotions (73.7%). A total of 69.2% felt the meeting helped coping with parents' pressure and 88.9% stated that the trajectory changed how they saw themselves involved in future paediatric palliative care.

Conclusion: The shared care model was evaluated positively. Clear agreements and specialist support were prerequisites for good trajectories at the end of life. Further research is needed to investigate if the shared care model optimises palliative care and security in relation to child and family.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1995, International Journal of Palliative Nursing (IJPN) has been committed to promoting excellence in palliative and hospice care. It is now established as the leading journal for nurses working in this most demanding profession, covering all aspects of palliative care nursing in a way which is intelligent, helpful and accessible, and so useful in daily practice. The aim of IJPN is to provide nurses with essential information to help them deliver the best possible care and support for their patients. Each issue contains an unparalleled range of peer-reviewed clinical, professional and educational articles, as well as helpful and informative information on practical, legal and policy issues of importance to all palliative nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信