Mohammad Abu Zaid, Ozlem Dalmizrak, Kerem Teralı, Nazmi Ozer
{"title":"脱落酸和赤霉素酸抑制人胎盘谷胱甘肽s -转移酶P1-1的机制:一项综合实验和计算研究","authors":"Mohammad Abu Zaid, Ozlem Dalmizrak, Kerem Teralı, Nazmi Ozer","doi":"10.1002/jmr.3050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interactions of the classic phytohormones gibberellic acid (gibberellin A<sub>3</sub>, GA<sub>3</sub>) and abscisic acid (dormin, ABA), which antagonistically regulate several developmental processes and stress responses in higher plants, with human placental glutathione <i>S</i>-transferase P1-1 (<i>hp</i>GSTP1-1), an enzyme that plays a role in endo- or xenobiotic detoxification and regulation of cell survival and apoptosis, were investigated. The inhibitory potencies of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> against <i>hp</i>GSTP1, as well as the types of inhibition and the kinetic parameters, were determined by making use of both enzyme kinetic graphs and SPSS nonlinear regression models. The structural basis for the interaction between <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 and phytohormones was predicted with the aid of molecular docking simulations. The <i>IC</i><sub>50</sub> values of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> were 5.3 and 5.0 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones inhibited <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 in competitive manner with respect to the cosubstrates GSH and CDNB. When ABA was the inhibitor at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub>, <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> values were statistically estimated to be 205 ± 16 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.32 ± 0.18 mM, 1.95 ± 0.25 mM and 175 ± 6 μmol/min-mg protein, 0.85 ± 0.06 mM, 1.85 ± 0.16 mM, respectively. On the other hand, the kinetic parameters <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> obtained with GA<sub>3</sub> at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub> were found to be 303 ± 14 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.77 ± 0.13 mM, 3.38 ± 0.26 mM and 249 ± 7 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.43 ± 0.07 mM, 2.89 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones had the potential to engage in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions with the key residues that line the G- and H-sites of the enzyme's catalytic center. Inhibitory actions of ABA/GA<sub>3</sub> on <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 may guide medicinal chemists through the structure-based design of novel antineoplastic agents. It should be noted, however, that the same interactions may also render fetuses vulnerable to the potentially toxic effects of xenobiotics and noxious endobiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic insights into the inhibition of human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 by abscisic and gibberellic acids: An integrated experimental and computational study\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abu Zaid, Ozlem Dalmizrak, Kerem Teralı, Nazmi Ozer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmr.3050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The interactions of the classic phytohormones gibberellic acid (gibberellin A<sub>3</sub>, GA<sub>3</sub>) and abscisic acid (dormin, ABA), which antagonistically regulate several developmental processes and stress responses in higher plants, with human placental glutathione <i>S</i>-transferase P1-1 (<i>hp</i>GSTP1-1), an enzyme that plays a role in endo- or xenobiotic detoxification and regulation of cell survival and apoptosis, were investigated. The inhibitory potencies of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> against <i>hp</i>GSTP1, as well as the types of inhibition and the kinetic parameters, were determined by making use of both enzyme kinetic graphs and SPSS nonlinear regression models. The structural basis for the interaction between <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 and phytohormones was predicted with the aid of molecular docking simulations. The <i>IC</i><sub>50</sub> values of ABA and GA<sub>3</sub> were 5.3 and 5.0 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones inhibited <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 in competitive manner with respect to the cosubstrates GSH and CDNB. When ABA was the inhibitor at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub>, <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> values were statistically estimated to be 205 ± 16 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.32 ± 0.18 mM, 1.95 ± 0.25 mM and 175 ± 6 μmol/min-mg protein, 0.85 ± 0.06 mM, 1.85 ± 0.16 mM, respectively. On the other hand, the kinetic parameters <i>V</i><sub>m</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>, and <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> obtained with GA<sub>3</sub> at [CDNB]<sub>f</sub>–[GSH]<sub>v</sub> and at [GSH]<sub>f</sub>–[CDNB]<sub>v</sub> were found to be 303 ± 14 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.77 ± 0.13 mM, 3.38 ± 0.26 mM and 249 ± 7 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.43 ± 0.07 mM, 2.89 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones had the potential to engage in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions with the key residues that line the G- and H-sites of the enzyme's catalytic center. Inhibitory actions of ABA/GA<sub>3</sub> on <i>hp</i>GSTP1-1 may guide medicinal chemists through the structure-based design of novel antineoplastic agents. It should be noted, however, that the same interactions may also render fetuses vulnerable to the potentially toxic effects of xenobiotics and noxious endobiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了经典植物激素赤霉素酸(gibberellin A3, GA3)和脱落酸(dormin, ABA)与人胎盘谷胱甘肽s -转移酶P1-1 (hpGSTP1-1)的相互作用,该酶在内源性或外源性解毒以及细胞存活和凋亡的调节中起作用。赤霉素酸(gibberellin A3, GA3)和脱落酸(dormin, ABA)拮抗高等植物的几种发育过程和应激反应。利用酶动力学图和SPSS非线性回归模型确定了ABA和GA3对hpGSTP1的抑制能力、抑制类型和动力学参数。通过分子对接模拟,预测了hpGSTP1-1与植物激素相互作用的结构基础。ABA和GA3的IC50值分别为5.3和5.0 mM。两种植物激素都以竞争的方式抑制了hpGSTP1-1的共底物GSH和CDNB。当ABA在[CDNB]f - [GSH]v和[GSH]f - [CDNB]v处作为抑制剂时,Vm、Km和Ki值分别为205±16 μmol/min-mg蛋白,1.32±0.18 mM, 1.95±0.25 mM和175±6 μmol/min-mg蛋白,0.85±0.06 mM, 1.85±0.16 mM。GA3在[CDNB]f - [GSH]v和[GSH]f - [CDNB]v下的动力学参数Vm、Km和Ki分别为303±14 μmol/min-mg蛋白,1.77±0.13 mM, 3.38±0.26 mM和249±7 μmol/min-mg蛋白,1.43±0.07 mM, 2.89±0.19 mM。这两种植物激素都有可能与酶催化中心的G和h位点的关键残基进行氢键和静电相互作用。ABA/GA3对hpGSTP1-1的抑制作用可以指导药物化学家通过基于结构的新型抗肿瘤药物的设计。然而,应该注意的是,同样的相互作用也可能使胎儿容易受到外源性和有毒内源性药物的潜在毒性影响。
Mechanistic insights into the inhibition of human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 by abscisic and gibberellic acids: An integrated experimental and computational study
The interactions of the classic phytohormones gibberellic acid (gibberellin A3, GA3) and abscisic acid (dormin, ABA), which antagonistically regulate several developmental processes and stress responses in higher plants, with human placental glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (hpGSTP1-1), an enzyme that plays a role in endo- or xenobiotic detoxification and regulation of cell survival and apoptosis, were investigated. The inhibitory potencies of ABA and GA3 against hpGSTP1, as well as the types of inhibition and the kinetic parameters, were determined by making use of both enzyme kinetic graphs and SPSS nonlinear regression models. The structural basis for the interaction between hpGSTP1-1 and phytohormones was predicted with the aid of molecular docking simulations. The IC50 values of ABA and GA3 were 5.3 and 5.0 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones inhibited hpGSTP1-1 in competitive manner with respect to the cosubstrates GSH and CDNB. When ABA was the inhibitor at [CDNB]f–[GSH]v and at [GSH]f–[CDNB]v, Vm, Km, and Ki values were statistically estimated to be 205 ± 16 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.32 ± 0.18 mM, 1.95 ± 0.25 mM and 175 ± 6 μmol/min-mg protein, 0.85 ± 0.06 mM, 1.85 ± 0.16 mM, respectively. On the other hand, the kinetic parameters Vm, Km, and Ki obtained with GA3 at [CDNB]f–[GSH]v and at [GSH]f–[CDNB]v were found to be 303 ± 14 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.77 ± 0.13 mM, 3.38 ± 0.26 mM and 249 ± 7 μmol/min-mg protein, 1.43 ± 0.07 mM, 2.89 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Both phytohormones had the potential to engage in hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions with the key residues that line the G- and H-sites of the enzyme's catalytic center. Inhibitory actions of ABA/GA3 on hpGSTP1-1 may guide medicinal chemists through the structure-based design of novel antineoplastic agents. It should be noted, however, that the same interactions may also render fetuses vulnerable to the potentially toxic effects of xenobiotics and noxious endobiotics.