在接受家庭健康物理治疗的社区老年人中,训练有素的家庭帮工对预防自主性丧失和跌倒的干预:一项随机对照试验研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Anthony Mézière, Nadia Oubaya, Valérie Michel-Pellegrino, Bertrand Boudin, Marine Neau, Hervé Robert, Isabelle Cara, Laura Salgado Sanchez, Samia Baloul, François Piette, Eric Pautas, Yannick Picou, Valentine Curtis, Claire Schonheit, Florence Canouï-Poitrine, Caroline Moreau
{"title":"在接受家庭健康物理治疗的社区老年人中,训练有素的家庭帮工对预防自主性丧失和跌倒的干预:一项随机对照试验研究。","authors":"Anthony Mézière,&nbsp;Nadia Oubaya,&nbsp;Valérie Michel-Pellegrino,&nbsp;Bertrand Boudin,&nbsp;Marine Neau,&nbsp;Hervé Robert,&nbsp;Isabelle Cara,&nbsp;Laura Salgado Sanchez,&nbsp;Samia Baloul,&nbsp;François Piette,&nbsp;Eric Pautas,&nbsp;Yannick Picou,&nbsp;Valentine Curtis,&nbsp;Claire Schonheit,&nbsp;Florence Canouï-Poitrine,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Older adults at risk for falls live independently in the community in their own home and have rehabilitation needs. However, little is known about whether home coaching of older adults can decrease falls at home. We sought to determine whether a novel program for preventing falls and a loss of exercise capacity, the T4H program, in which home helpers act as exercise coaches by using an information technology (IT) device, was acceptable and feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2015 and October 2015, we performed a cluster randomized controlled trial in which home helpers either assisted older adults 75 years and over, to participate in the T4H program, or provided standard home help over 3 months. We assessed levels of acceptability and satisfaction among the older adults and home helpers with regard to the exercise program and the technologies used. To measure efficacy, the main outcome measures for the older adults were the absence of falls requiring medical or paramedical care, unplanned hospitalizations, walking ability in a Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and self-care ability by the Barthel Index at the 3-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Overall, 35 older adults were included, aged 89 years and with 68.6% women. Eighty-five percent of the respondents were pleased or very pleased to have participated in the T4H exercise program, 70% were satisfied with the IT devices, and 92% were satisfied with their home helper's level of involvement. Two of the 4 home helper respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the exercise program, and 2 were moderately satisfied. The proportions of older adult participants with no falls or no unplanned hospitalizations were higher in the T4H group (92.3% and 85.7%, respectively) than in the control group (81.8% and 71.4%, respectively), although these intergroup differences were not statistically significant. The T4H and control groups did not differ significantly with regard to the TUG time (median [IQR]: 27.6 seconds [17.9-58.6] vs 30.7 seconds [19.7-57.2], respectively) or the Barthel Index (median [IQR]: 90 [75-95] and 90 [75-95], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel T4H home help model was feasible and was associated with a high level of participant satisfaction. We observed a trend toward fewer falls and hospitalizations and better quality of life in the older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":"44 3","pages":"E138-E149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Interventions With Trained Home Helpers for Preventing Loss of Autonomy and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Receiving Home Heath Physical Therapy T4H: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Mézière,&nbsp;Nadia Oubaya,&nbsp;Valérie Michel-Pellegrino,&nbsp;Bertrand Boudin,&nbsp;Marine Neau,&nbsp;Hervé Robert,&nbsp;Isabelle Cara,&nbsp;Laura Salgado Sanchez,&nbsp;Samia Baloul,&nbsp;François Piette,&nbsp;Eric Pautas,&nbsp;Yannick Picou,&nbsp;Valentine Curtis,&nbsp;Claire Schonheit,&nbsp;Florence Canouï-Poitrine,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Older adults at risk for falls live independently in the community in their own home and have rehabilitation needs. However, little is known about whether home coaching of older adults can decrease falls at home. We sought to determine whether a novel program for preventing falls and a loss of exercise capacity, the T4H program, in which home helpers act as exercise coaches by using an information technology (IT) device, was acceptable and feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2015 and October 2015, we performed a cluster randomized controlled trial in which home helpers either assisted older adults 75 years and over, to participate in the T4H program, or provided standard home help over 3 months. We assessed levels of acceptability and satisfaction among the older adults and home helpers with regard to the exercise program and the technologies used. To measure efficacy, the main outcome measures for the older adults were the absence of falls requiring medical or paramedical care, unplanned hospitalizations, walking ability in a Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and self-care ability by the Barthel Index at the 3-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Overall, 35 older adults were included, aged 89 years and with 68.6% women. Eighty-five percent of the respondents were pleased or very pleased to have participated in the T4H exercise program, 70% were satisfied with the IT devices, and 92% were satisfied with their home helper's level of involvement. Two of the 4 home helper respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the exercise program, and 2 were moderately satisfied. The proportions of older adult participants with no falls or no unplanned hospitalizations were higher in the T4H group (92.3% and 85.7%, respectively) than in the control group (81.8% and 71.4%, respectively), although these intergroup differences were not statistically significant. The T4H and control groups did not differ significantly with regard to the TUG time (median [IQR]: 27.6 seconds [17.9-58.6] vs 30.7 seconds [19.7-57.2], respectively) or the Barthel Index (median [IQR]: 90 [75-95] and 90 [75-95], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel T4H home help model was feasible and was associated with a high level of participant satisfaction. We observed a trend toward fewer falls and hospitalizations and better quality of life in the older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"E138-E149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:有跌倒风险的老年人在社区自己家中独立生活,并有康复需求。然而,对于老年人的家庭辅导是否能减少在家跌倒,人们知之甚少。我们试图确定一个防止跌倒和运动能力丧失的新项目,T4H项目,在这个项目中,家庭助手通过使用信息技术(IT)设备充当运动教练,是否可以接受和可行。方法:在2015年2月至2015年10月期间,我们进行了一项集群随机对照试验,在该试验中,家庭帮佣要么帮助75岁及以上的老年人参加T4H计划,要么提供超过3个月的标准家庭帮佣。我们评估了老年人和家庭佣工对锻炼计划和使用的技术的接受程度和满意度。为了衡量疗效,对老年人的主要结果测量是不需要医疗或辅助医疗护理的跌倒,计划外住院,在3个月的随访中,通过时间起身和行走测试(TUG)的行走能力和Barthel指数的自我护理能力。结果和讨论:总共纳入35名老年人,年龄89岁,其中68.6%为女性。85%的受访者对参与T4H锻炼计划感到满意或非常满意,70%的受访者对IT设备感到满意,92%的受访者对他们的家庭佣工的参与程度感到满意。4名家庭佣工受访者中,有2名对运动计划感到满意或非常满意,2名表示一般满意。T4H组老年人未跌倒或未计划外住院的比例(分别为92.3%和85.7%)高于对照组(分别为81.8%和71.4%),尽管这些组间差异无统计学意义。T4H组和对照组在TUG时间(中位数[IQR]: 27.6秒[17.9-58.6]vs 30.7秒[19.7-57.2])和Barthel指数(中位数[IQR]: 90[75-95]和90[75-95])方面无显著差异。结论:新的T4H家政服务模型是可行的,并与高水平的参与者满意度相关。我们观察到老年人跌倒和住院次数减少以及生活质量提高的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exercise Interventions With Trained Home Helpers for Preventing Loss of Autonomy and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Receiving Home Heath Physical Therapy T4H: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Background and purpose: Older adults at risk for falls live independently in the community in their own home and have rehabilitation needs. However, little is known about whether home coaching of older adults can decrease falls at home. We sought to determine whether a novel program for preventing falls and a loss of exercise capacity, the T4H program, in which home helpers act as exercise coaches by using an information technology (IT) device, was acceptable and feasible.

Methods: Between February 2015 and October 2015, we performed a cluster randomized controlled trial in which home helpers either assisted older adults 75 years and over, to participate in the T4H program, or provided standard home help over 3 months. We assessed levels of acceptability and satisfaction among the older adults and home helpers with regard to the exercise program and the technologies used. To measure efficacy, the main outcome measures for the older adults were the absence of falls requiring medical or paramedical care, unplanned hospitalizations, walking ability in a Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and self-care ability by the Barthel Index at the 3-month follow-up visit.

Results and discussion: Overall, 35 older adults were included, aged 89 years and with 68.6% women. Eighty-five percent of the respondents were pleased or very pleased to have participated in the T4H exercise program, 70% were satisfied with the IT devices, and 92% were satisfied with their home helper's level of involvement. Two of the 4 home helper respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the exercise program, and 2 were moderately satisfied. The proportions of older adult participants with no falls or no unplanned hospitalizations were higher in the T4H group (92.3% and 85.7%, respectively) than in the control group (81.8% and 71.4%, respectively), although these intergroup differences were not statistically significant. The T4H and control groups did not differ significantly with regard to the TUG time (median [IQR]: 27.6 seconds [17.9-58.6] vs 30.7 seconds [19.7-57.2], respectively) or the Barthel Index (median [IQR]: 90 [75-95] and 90 [75-95], respectively).

Conclusions: The novel T4H home help model was feasible and was associated with a high level of participant satisfaction. We observed a trend toward fewer falls and hospitalizations and better quality of life in the older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信