"收拾残局":患者对治疗过程中破裂解决事件的回顾性反思。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2023.2245128
Tal Ben David-Sela, Liat Leibovich, Yara Khoury, Clara E Hill, Sigal Zilcha-Mano
{"title":"\"收拾残局\":患者对治疗过程中破裂解决事件的回顾性反思。","authors":"Tal Ben David-Sela, Liat Leibovich, Yara Khoury, Clara E Hill, Sigal Zilcha-Mano","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2023.2245128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> Although theorists and researchers have stressed the importance of rupture resolution episodes for successful treatment process and outcome, little is known about patients' retrospective reflections about rupture resolution. <b>Aim:</b> The overarching goal of the present study was to use a mixed-method approach to examine patients' retrospective reflections on the frequency, types, and consequences of rupture resolution episodes and the association between rupture resolution episodes and patients' attachment orientation and treatment outcome. <b>Method:</b> Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) were interviewed, on average three years after termination, about their experiences of ruptures in short-term dynamic psychotherapy. <b>Results:</b> Thirty patients reported having experienced at least one rupture, with patients who showed less improvement in depressive symptoms more likely to report having had a rupture. Ruptures were judged as having been successfully resolved for 13 of these patients; suggesting that patients with a high level of attachment anxiety were less likely to be judged as having had a successful resolution. Patients whose ruptures were successfully resolved with the therapist's help reported better treatment process and outcome than patients whose ruptures were not successfully resolved. <b>Conclusion:</b> Results highlight the importance of hearing patients' perspectives on ruptures, rupture resolution, and treatment outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"858-871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Picking up the pieces\\\": Patients' retrospective reflections of rupture resolution episodes during treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Tal Ben David-Sela, Liat Leibovich, Yara Khoury, Clara E Hill, Sigal Zilcha-Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2023.2245128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> Although theorists and researchers have stressed the importance of rupture resolution episodes for successful treatment process and outcome, little is known about patients' retrospective reflections about rupture resolution. <b>Aim:</b> The overarching goal of the present study was to use a mixed-method approach to examine patients' retrospective reflections on the frequency, types, and consequences of rupture resolution episodes and the association between rupture resolution episodes and patients' attachment orientation and treatment outcome. <b>Method:</b> Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) were interviewed, on average three years after termination, about their experiences of ruptures in short-term dynamic psychotherapy. <b>Results:</b> Thirty patients reported having experienced at least one rupture, with patients who showed less improvement in depressive symptoms more likely to report having had a rupture. Ruptures were judged as having been successfully resolved for 13 of these patients; suggesting that patients with a high level of attachment anxiety were less likely to be judged as having had a successful resolution. Patients whose ruptures were successfully resolved with the therapist's help reported better treatment process and outcome than patients whose ruptures were not successfully resolved. <b>Conclusion:</b> Results highlight the importance of hearing patients' perspectives on ruptures, rupture resolution, and treatment outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"858-871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2245128\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2245128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管理论家和研究人员都强调了破裂解决事件对于成功治疗过程和结果的重要性,但对于患者对破裂解决事件的回顾性反思却知之甚少。目的:本研究的首要目标是采用混合方法,考察患者对破裂解决事件的频率、类型和后果的回顾性反思,以及破裂解决事件与患者依恋取向和治疗结果之间的关联。研究方法对38名被诊断为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的患者进行了访谈,访谈内容涉及他们在短期动态心理治疗中的破裂经历,平均时间为治疗终止三年后。结果显示有 30 名患者报告至少经历过一次治疗中断,其中抑郁症状改善较少的患者更有可能报告治疗中断。在这些患者中,有 13 人的心理创伤被判定为已成功解决;这表明,依恋焦虑程度较高的患者被判定为已成功解决心理创伤的可能性较小。在治疗师的帮助下成功解决破裂问题的患者,其治疗过程和结果均优于破裂问题未成功解决的患者。结论研究结果凸显了听取患者对破裂、破裂解决和治疗结果看法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Picking up the pieces": Patients' retrospective reflections of rupture resolution episodes during treatment.

Objective: Although theorists and researchers have stressed the importance of rupture resolution episodes for successful treatment process and outcome, little is known about patients' retrospective reflections about rupture resolution. Aim: The overarching goal of the present study was to use a mixed-method approach to examine patients' retrospective reflections on the frequency, types, and consequences of rupture resolution episodes and the association between rupture resolution episodes and patients' attachment orientation and treatment outcome. Method: Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) were interviewed, on average three years after termination, about their experiences of ruptures in short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Results: Thirty patients reported having experienced at least one rupture, with patients who showed less improvement in depressive symptoms more likely to report having had a rupture. Ruptures were judged as having been successfully resolved for 13 of these patients; suggesting that patients with a high level of attachment anxiety were less likely to be judged as having had a successful resolution. Patients whose ruptures were successfully resolved with the therapist's help reported better treatment process and outcome than patients whose ruptures were not successfully resolved. Conclusion: Results highlight the importance of hearing patients' perspectives on ruptures, rupture resolution, and treatment outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信