高渗盐水联合气道清除治疗复发性喘息的非住院儿童的疗效和安全性。

Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1142/S1013702523500105
Vanesa González-Bellido, Verónica Veláz-Baza, Noelia Rama-Suárez, Carmen Jimeno-Esteo, Josep Sirvent-Gomez, Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar, Sari Mayorales-Lises, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Samuel Fernández-Carnero
{"title":"高渗盐水联合气道清除治疗复发性喘息的非住院儿童的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Vanesa González-Bellido,&nbsp;Verónica Veláz-Baza,&nbsp;Noelia Rama-Suárez,&nbsp;Carmen Jimeno-Esteo,&nbsp;Josep Sirvent-Gomez,&nbsp;Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar,&nbsp;Sari Mayorales-Lises,&nbsp;Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio,&nbsp;Samuel Fernández-Carnero","doi":"10.1142/S1013702523500105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Study of Wheezing in Infants defines recurrent wheezing as the presence of three or more medically documented episodes of wheezing within one year. To date, there is no evidence on the use of hypertonic saline (HS) combined with airway clearance techniques (ACT) for children with recurrent wheezing treated in an outpatient setting. Therefore, this is the first study to explore the use of such interventions in infants with recurrent wheezing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects and safety of a three-month protocol including HS and ACT for non-hospitalized infants with recurrent wheezing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, including outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing. Children were randomized to either 3% HS or 0.9% saline groups and were treated with bronchodilator and nebulized with the respective solutions before ACT. The primary outcome was the Wang score. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospitalizations and respiratory crisis, need for rescue medication, and school absences. All variables were measured during the three previous months from inclusion and during intervention period. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04331496) on March, 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty children were included. Regarding immediate effects, significant differences (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>) were found for time, but not for group or interaction (group × time), in all outcome variables (increase in SpO<sub>2</sub>, decrease in heart and respiratory rate, wheezing episodes, retraction, and Wang score). Comparing the previous three months with the study period, there were significant differences in both groups for the severity of crisis (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>) and medication steps (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></math>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A three-month protocol including HS and ACT for outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing was safe and reduced morbidity. No differences were found between the use of HS and 0.9% saline.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/f3/hkpj-43-105.PMC10423675.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.\",\"authors\":\"Vanesa González-Bellido,&nbsp;Verónica Veláz-Baza,&nbsp;Noelia Rama-Suárez,&nbsp;Carmen Jimeno-Esteo,&nbsp;Josep Sirvent-Gomez,&nbsp;Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar,&nbsp;Sari Mayorales-Lises,&nbsp;Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio,&nbsp;Samuel Fernández-Carnero\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1013702523500105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Study of Wheezing in Infants defines recurrent wheezing as the presence of three or more medically documented episodes of wheezing within one year. To date, there is no evidence on the use of hypertonic saline (HS) combined with airway clearance techniques (ACT) for children with recurrent wheezing treated in an outpatient setting. Therefore, this is the first study to explore the use of such interventions in infants with recurrent wheezing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects and safety of a three-month protocol including HS and ACT for non-hospitalized infants with recurrent wheezing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, including outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing. Children were randomized to either 3% HS or 0.9% saline groups and were treated with bronchodilator and nebulized with the respective solutions before ACT. The primary outcome was the Wang score. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospitalizations and respiratory crisis, need for rescue medication, and school absences. All variables were measured during the three previous months from inclusion and during intervention period. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04331496) on March, 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty children were included. Regarding immediate effects, significant differences (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>) were found for time, but not for group or interaction (group × time), in all outcome variables (increase in SpO<sub>2</sub>, decrease in heart and respiratory rate, wheezing episodes, retraction, and Wang score). Comparing the previous three months with the study period, there were significant differences in both groups for the severity of crisis (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>) and medication steps (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></math>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A three-month protocol including HS and ACT for outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing was safe and reduced morbidity. No differences were found between the use of HS and 0.9% saline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/f3/hkpj-43-105.PMC10423675.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702523500105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702523500105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际婴儿喘息研究将复发性喘息定义为一年内出现三次或三次以上医学记录的喘息发作。到目前为止,没有证据表明在门诊环境中使用高渗盐水(HS)联合气道清除技术(ACT)治疗复发性喘息的儿童。因此,这是第一项探索在反复喘息的婴儿中使用此类干预措施的研究。目的:评估包括HS和ACT在内的三个月方案治疗复发性喘息的非住院婴儿的效果和安全性。方法:随机、双盲、对照试验,包括门诊婴幼儿反复喘息。儿童被随机分为3%HS组或0.9%生理盐水组,在ACT前用支气管扩张剂治疗并用各自的溶液雾化。主要结果是王的得分。次要结果包括住院人数和呼吸系统危机、需要抢救药物和缺课。所有变量均在纳入后的前三个月和干预期内进行测量。该研究方案于2020年3月31日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04331496)上注册。结果:包括40名儿童。关于即时效果,在所有结果变量(SpO2增加、心率和呼吸频率降低、喘息发作、回缩和王评分)中,发现时间上存在显著差异(p0.001),但组或交互作用(组×时间)没有显著差异。将前三个月与研究期间进行比较,两组在危机严重程度(p0.001)和用药步骤(p=0.002)方面存在显著差异。结论:包括HS和ACT在内的三个月方案治疗复发性喘息的门诊婴儿是安全的,并降低了发病率。在使用HS和0.9%生理盐水之间没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

分享
查看原文
Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

Background: The International Study of Wheezing in Infants defines recurrent wheezing as the presence of three or more medically documented episodes of wheezing within one year. To date, there is no evidence on the use of hypertonic saline (HS) combined with airway clearance techniques (ACT) for children with recurrent wheezing treated in an outpatient setting. Therefore, this is the first study to explore the use of such interventions in infants with recurrent wheezing.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects and safety of a three-month protocol including HS and ACT for non-hospitalized infants with recurrent wheezing.

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, including outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing. Children were randomized to either 3% HS or 0.9% saline groups and were treated with bronchodilator and nebulized with the respective solutions before ACT. The primary outcome was the Wang score. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospitalizations and respiratory crisis, need for rescue medication, and school absences. All variables were measured during the three previous months from inclusion and during intervention period. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04331496) on March, 31, 2020.

Results: Forty children were included. Regarding immediate effects, significant differences (p<0.001) were found for time, but not for group or interaction (group × time), in all outcome variables (increase in SpO2, decrease in heart and respiratory rate, wheezing episodes, retraction, and Wang score). Comparing the previous three months with the study period, there were significant differences in both groups for the severity of crisis (p<0.001) and medication steps (p=0.002).

Conclusion: A three-month protocol including HS and ACT for outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing was safe and reduced morbidity. No differences were found between the use of HS and 0.9% saline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信