将以人为本的叙述融入电子健康记录。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680
Heather Coats, Nadia Shive, Bonnie Adrian, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Sarah J Schmiege
{"title":"将以人为本的叙述融入电子健康记录。","authors":"Heather Coats, Nadia Shive, Bonnie Adrian, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Sarah J Schmiege","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care delivery that is not person-centered has been called discordant care . There has been a shift to incorporate more of a person's narrative into their individual healthcare treatment plan to reduce discordant care. Aligning with this shift in healthcare delivery, we developed a person-centered narrative intervention (PCNI) to address existing gaps in delivery of person-centered care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized study and describe the outcomes of PCNI to usual care on the following person (patient)-reported outcomes: perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study's design was an Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials model Phase II proof-of-concept randomized study. The participants were people admitted to an acute care hospital diagnosed with heart failure and/or end-stage renal disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite COVID-19 challenges, the PCNI was feasible in an acute care setting; it showed a moderate positive difference between conditions in the person's perception of their quality of communication and a small positive difference in their perception of feeling heard and understood. For our secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, and psychosocial illness effect, there were small or no effects in the acute care setting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using a person-centered narrative, such as the PCNI, can help inform delivery of care that incorporates a person's (patient's) beliefs, values, and preferences into their healthcare. This study used a pragmatic approach to evaluate the PCNI in real time in an acute care setting to assess patient-reported outcomes. These positive results in a small sample indicate the need for continued testing of the PCNI. These promising effects require further testing in a Phase III efficacy study within a larger randomized controlled clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"421-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Coats, Nadia Shive, Bonnie Adrian, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Sarah J Schmiege\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care delivery that is not person-centered has been called discordant care . There has been a shift to incorporate more of a person's narrative into their individual healthcare treatment plan to reduce discordant care. Aligning with this shift in healthcare delivery, we developed a person-centered narrative intervention (PCNI) to address existing gaps in delivery of person-centered care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized study and describe the outcomes of PCNI to usual care on the following person (patient)-reported outcomes: perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study's design was an Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials model Phase II proof-of-concept randomized study. The participants were people admitted to an acute care hospital diagnosed with heart failure and/or end-stage renal disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite COVID-19 challenges, the PCNI was feasible in an acute care setting; it showed a moderate positive difference between conditions in the person's perception of their quality of communication and a small positive difference in their perception of feeling heard and understood. For our secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, and psychosocial illness effect, there were small or no effects in the acute care setting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using a person-centered narrative, such as the PCNI, can help inform delivery of care that incorporates a person's (patient's) beliefs, values, and preferences into their healthcare. This study used a pragmatic approach to evaluate the PCNI in real time in an acute care setting to assess patient-reported outcomes. These positive results in a small sample indicate the need for continued testing of the PCNI. These promising effects require further testing in a Phase III efficacy study within a larger randomized controlled clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"421-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不以人为中心的护理提供被称为不和谐护理。已经有一种转变,将更多的人的叙述纳入他们的个人医疗保健治疗计划,以减少不和谐的护理。为了配合医疗服务提供的这种转变,我们开发了一种以人为中心的叙事干预(PCNI),以解决以人为中心提供医疗服务方面存在的差距。目的:本研究旨在评估进行随机研究的可行性,并描述PCNI对以下个人(患者)常规护理的结果——报告的结果:对与护士沟通质量的感知以及他们的心理社会和生存幸福感。方法:本研究的设计是一项肥胖相关行为干预试验模型II期概念验证随机研究。参与者是被诊断为心力衰竭和/或终末期肾病的急性护理医院的患者。结果:尽管新冠肺炎面临挑战,但PCNI在急性护理环境中是可行的;研究显示,在人们对沟通质量的感知方面,两种情况之间存在适度的正差异,而在他们对被倾听和被理解的感知方面则存在微小的正差异。对于焦虑、抑郁和心理社会疾病影响的次要结果,在急性护理环境中影响很小或没有影响。讨论:使用以人为中心的叙述,如PCNI,可以帮助告知将一个人(患者)的信仰、价值观和偏好纳入其医疗保健的护理提供情况。本研究采用实用的方法在急性护理环境中实时评估PCNI,以评估患者报告的结果。小样本中的这些阳性结果表明需要继续检测PCNI。这些有希望的效果需要在更大规模的随机对照临床试验中进行III期疗效研究的进一步测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record.

Background: Care delivery that is not person-centered has been called discordant care . There has been a shift to incorporate more of a person's narrative into their individual healthcare treatment plan to reduce discordant care. Aligning with this shift in healthcare delivery, we developed a person-centered narrative intervention (PCNI) to address existing gaps in delivery of person-centered care.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized study and describe the outcomes of PCNI to usual care on the following person (patient)-reported outcomes: perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being.

Methods: This study's design was an Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials model Phase II proof-of-concept randomized study. The participants were people admitted to an acute care hospital diagnosed with heart failure and/or end-stage renal disease.

Results: Despite COVID-19 challenges, the PCNI was feasible in an acute care setting; it showed a moderate positive difference between conditions in the person's perception of their quality of communication and a small positive difference in their perception of feeling heard and understood. For our secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, and psychosocial illness effect, there were small or no effects in the acute care setting.

Discussion: Using a person-centered narrative, such as the PCNI, can help inform delivery of care that incorporates a person's (patient's) beliefs, values, and preferences into their healthcare. This study used a pragmatic approach to evaluate the PCNI in real time in an acute care setting to assess patient-reported outcomes. These positive results in a small sample indicate the need for continued testing of the PCNI. These promising effects require further testing in a Phase III efficacy study within a larger randomized controlled clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信