术前虚弱预示着三叉神经痛、面肌痉挛和舌咽神经痛微血管减压后更糟糕的结果:一项来自前瞻性外科登记的1473例患者的多中心分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Emily Estes, Kavelin Rumalla, Alis J Dicpinigaitis, Syed Faraz Kazim, Aaron Segura, Alexander J Kassicieh, Meic H Schmidt, Christian A Bowers
{"title":"术前虚弱预示着三叉神经痛、面肌痉挛和舌咽神经痛微血管减压后更糟糕的结果:一项来自前瞻性外科登记的1473例患者的多中心分析。","authors":"Emily Estes,&nbsp;Kavelin Rumalla,&nbsp;Alis J Dicpinigaitis,&nbsp;Syed Faraz Kazim,&nbsp;Aaron Segura,&nbsp;Alexander J Kassicieh,&nbsp;Meic H Schmidt,&nbsp;Christian A Bowers","doi":"10.1159/000529763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an efficacious neurosurgical intervention for patients with medically intractable neurovascular compression syndromes. However, MVD may occasionally cause life-threatening or altering complications, particularly in patients unfit for surgical operations. Recent literature suggests a lack of association between chronological age and surgical outcomes for MVD. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated frailty tool for surgical populations (both clinical and large database). The present study sought to evaluate the prognostic ability of frailty, as measured by RAI, to predict outcomes for patients undergoing MVD from a large multicenter surgical registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011-2020) was queried using diagnosis/procedure codes for patients undergoing MVD procedures for trigeminal neuralgia (n = 1,211), hemifacial spasm (n = 236), or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (n = 26). The relationship between preoperative frailty (measured by RAI and 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) for primary endpoint of adverse discharge outcome (AD) was analyzed. AD was defined as discharge to a facility which was not home, hospice, or death within 30 days. Discriminatory accuracy for prediction of AD was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing MVD (N = 1,473) were stratified by RAI frailty bins: 71% with RAI 0-20, 28% with RAI 21-30, and 1.2% with RAI 31+. Compared to RAI score 19 and below, RAI 20 and above had significantly higher rates of postoperative major complications (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.001), and AD (6.1% vs. 1.0%, p &lt; 0.001). The rate of primary endpoint was 2.4% (N = 36) and was positively associated with increasing frailty tier: 1.5% in 0-20, 5.8% in 21-30, and 11.8% in 31+. RAI score demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy for primary endpoint in ROC analysis (C-statistic: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.79) and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to mFI-5 (C-statistic: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.66) (DeLong pairwise test, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first study to link preoperative frailty to worse surgical outcomes after MVD surgery. RAI frailty score predicts AD after MVD with excellent discrimination and holds promise for preoperative counseling and risk stratification of surgical candidates. A risk assessment tool was developed and deployed with a user-friendly calculator: <ext-link ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\">https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression</ext-link>.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Frailty Predicts Worse Outcomes after Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia, Hemifacial Spasm, and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Multicenter Analysis of 1,473 Patients from a Prospective Surgical Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Estes,&nbsp;Kavelin Rumalla,&nbsp;Alis J Dicpinigaitis,&nbsp;Syed Faraz Kazim,&nbsp;Aaron Segura,&nbsp;Alexander J Kassicieh,&nbsp;Meic H Schmidt,&nbsp;Christian A Bowers\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an efficacious neurosurgical intervention for patients with medically intractable neurovascular compression syndromes. However, MVD may occasionally cause life-threatening or altering complications, particularly in patients unfit for surgical operations. Recent literature suggests a lack of association between chronological age and surgical outcomes for MVD. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated frailty tool for surgical populations (both clinical and large database). The present study sought to evaluate the prognostic ability of frailty, as measured by RAI, to predict outcomes for patients undergoing MVD from a large multicenter surgical registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011-2020) was queried using diagnosis/procedure codes for patients undergoing MVD procedures for trigeminal neuralgia (n = 1,211), hemifacial spasm (n = 236), or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (n = 26). The relationship between preoperative frailty (measured by RAI and 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) for primary endpoint of adverse discharge outcome (AD) was analyzed. AD was defined as discharge to a facility which was not home, hospice, or death within 30 days. Discriminatory accuracy for prediction of AD was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing MVD (N = 1,473) were stratified by RAI frailty bins: 71% with RAI 0-20, 28% with RAI 21-30, and 1.2% with RAI 31+. Compared to RAI score 19 and below, RAI 20 and above had significantly higher rates of postoperative major complications (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.001), and AD (6.1% vs. 1.0%, p &lt; 0.001). The rate of primary endpoint was 2.4% (N = 36) and was positively associated with increasing frailty tier: 1.5% in 0-20, 5.8% in 21-30, and 11.8% in 31+. RAI score demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy for primary endpoint in ROC analysis (C-statistic: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.79) and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to mFI-5 (C-statistic: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.66) (DeLong pairwise test, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first study to link preoperative frailty to worse surgical outcomes after MVD surgery. RAI frailty score predicts AD after MVD with excellent discrimination and holds promise for preoperative counseling and risk stratification of surgical candidates. A risk assessment tool was developed and deployed with a user-friendly calculator: <ext-link ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\">https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression</ext-link>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529763\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

微血管减压(MVD)是一种有效的神经外科干预治疗难治性神经血管压迫综合征的患者。然而,MVD偶尔会引起危及生命或改变的并发症,特别是在不适合手术的患者中。最近的文献表明,实足年龄与MVD手术结果之间缺乏联系。风险分析指数(RAI)是外科人群(临床和大型数据库)的有效脆弱性工具。本研究旨在评估虚弱的预后能力,通过RAI来预测来自大型多中心手术登记的MVD患者的预后。方法:对三叉神经痛(n = 1211)、面肌痉挛(n = 236)或舌咽神经痛(n = 26)行MVD手术的患者,使用诊断/手术代码查询美国外科学会-国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库(2011-2020)。分析术前虚弱(以RAI和5因子修正虚弱指数[mFI-5]测量)与不良出院结局(adverse discharge outcomes, AD)主要终点的关系。AD被定义为在30天内离开非家庭、临终关怀或死亡的设施。通过计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析的c统计量(95%置信区间)来评估AD预测的区分准确性。结果:接受MVD的患者(N = 1473)按RAI衰弱指数分组:71%的患者RAI为0-20,28%的患者RAI为21-30,1.2%的患者RAI为31+。与RAI评分为19分及以下的患者相比,RAI评分为20分及以上的患者术后主要并发症发生率(2.8%比1.1%,p = 0.01)、Clavien-Dindo IV级并发症发生率(2.8%比0.7%,p = 0.001)和AD发生率(6.1%比1.0%,p <0.001)。主要终点率为2.4% (N = 36),与衰弱等级增加呈正相关:0-20岁为1.5%,21-30岁为5.8%,31岁以上为11.8%。在ROC分析中,RAI评分对主要终点具有极好的鉴别准确度(C-statistic: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.79),与mFI-5 (C-statistic: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.66)相比,RAI评分具有更好的鉴别能力(DeLong两两检验,p = 0.003)。结论:这是第一个将术前虚弱与MVD手术后较差的手术结果联系起来的研究。RAI衰弱评分预测MVD后AD具有良好的辨别能力,并为术前咨询和手术候选人的风险分层提供了希望。开发了一个风险评估工具,并使用了一个用户友好的计算器:https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative Frailty Predicts Worse Outcomes after Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia, Hemifacial Spasm, and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Multicenter Analysis of 1,473 Patients from a Prospective Surgical Registry.

Introduction: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an efficacious neurosurgical intervention for patients with medically intractable neurovascular compression syndromes. However, MVD may occasionally cause life-threatening or altering complications, particularly in patients unfit for surgical operations. Recent literature suggests a lack of association between chronological age and surgical outcomes for MVD. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated frailty tool for surgical populations (both clinical and large database). The present study sought to evaluate the prognostic ability of frailty, as measured by RAI, to predict outcomes for patients undergoing MVD from a large multicenter surgical registry.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011-2020) was queried using diagnosis/procedure codes for patients undergoing MVD procedures for trigeminal neuralgia (n = 1,211), hemifacial spasm (n = 236), or glossopharyngeal neuralgia (n = 26). The relationship between preoperative frailty (measured by RAI and 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) for primary endpoint of adverse discharge outcome (AD) was analyzed. AD was defined as discharge to a facility which was not home, hospice, or death within 30 days. Discriminatory accuracy for prediction of AD was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Patients undergoing MVD (N = 1,473) were stratified by RAI frailty bins: 71% with RAI 0-20, 28% with RAI 21-30, and 1.2% with RAI 31+. Compared to RAI score 19 and below, RAI 20 and above had significantly higher rates of postoperative major complications (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.001), and AD (6.1% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). The rate of primary endpoint was 2.4% (N = 36) and was positively associated with increasing frailty tier: 1.5% in 0-20, 5.8% in 21-30, and 11.8% in 31+. RAI score demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy for primary endpoint in ROC analysis (C-statistic: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.79) and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to mFI-5 (C-statistic: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.66) (DeLong pairwise test, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: This was the first study to link preoperative frailty to worse surgical outcomes after MVD surgery. RAI frailty score predicts AD after MVD with excellent discrimination and holds promise for preoperative counseling and risk stratification of surgical candidates. A risk assessment tool was developed and deployed with a user-friendly calculator: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/microvascularDecompression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信