Zhen-Bin Qiu MD , Meng-Min Wang MD , Jin-Hai Yan MD , Chao Zhang MD , Yi-Long Wu MD , Sheng Zhang MD, PhD , Wen-Zhao Zhong MD, PhD , the GDPH working group
{"title":"A Novel Radiopathological Grading System to Tailor Recurrence Risk for Pathologic Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma","authors":"Zhen-Bin Qiu MD , Meng-Min Wang MD , Jin-Hai Yan MD , Chao Zhang MD , Yi-Long Wu MD , Sheng Zhang MD, PhD , Wen-Zhao Zhong MD, PhD , the GDPH working group","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>To validate the efficiency of pathologic grading system in pathologic stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and explore whether integrating preoperative radiological features would enhance the performance of recurrence discrimination. We retrospectively collected 510 patients with resected stage IA LUAD between January 2012 and December 2019 from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH). Pathologic grade classification of each case was based on the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) pathologic staging system. Kaplan-Meier curves was used to assess the power of recurrence stratification. Concordance index (C-Index) and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used for evaluating the clinical utility of different grading systems for recurrence discrimination. Patients of lower IASLC grade showed improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (</span><em>P < 0.</em>0001) where numerically difference was found between grade II and grade III (<em>P =</em> 0.119). By integrating the IASLC grading system and radiological feature, we found the RFS rate decreased as the novel radiopathological (RP) grading system increased (<em>P < 0.</em>0001). The difference of RFS curves between any 2 groups as per the RP grading system was statisticallysignificant (RP grade I vs RP grade II, p = 0.007; RP grade I vs RP grade III, <em>P < 0.</em>0001; RP grade II vs RP grade III, <em>P =</em> 0.0003). Compared with the IASLC grading system, the RP grading system remarkably improved recurrence survival discrimination (C-index: 0.822; area under the curve, 0.845). Integrating imaging features into pathologic grading system enhanced the efficiency of recurrence discrimination for resected stage IA LUAD and might help conduct subsequent management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922001356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
To validate the efficiency of pathologic grading system in pathologic stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and explore whether integrating preoperative radiological features would enhance the performance of recurrence discrimination. We retrospectively collected 510 patients with resected stage IA LUAD between January 2012 and December 2019 from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH). Pathologic grade classification of each case was based on the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) pathologic staging system. Kaplan-Meier curves was used to assess the power of recurrence stratification. Concordance index (C-Index) and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used for evaluating the clinical utility of different grading systems for recurrence discrimination. Patients of lower IASLC grade showed improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.0001) where numerically difference was found between grade II and grade III (P = 0.119). By integrating the IASLC grading system and radiological feature, we found the RFS rate decreased as the novel radiopathological (RP) grading system increased (P < 0.0001). The difference of RFS curves between any 2 groups as per the RP grading system was statisticallysignificant (RP grade I vs RP grade II, p = 0.007; RP grade I vs RP grade III, P < 0.0001; RP grade II vs RP grade III, P = 0.0003). Compared with the IASLC grading system, the RP grading system remarkably improved recurrence survival discrimination (C-index: 0.822; area under the curve, 0.845). Integrating imaging features into pathologic grading system enhanced the efficiency of recurrence discrimination for resected stage IA LUAD and might help conduct subsequent management.
验证病理分级系统在病理分期IA肺腺癌(LUAD)中的有效性,并探讨整合术前放射学特征是否能提高复发鉴别能力。我们回顾性收集了2012年1月至2019年12月期间广东省人民医院(GDPH)切除的510例IA期LUAD患者。根据国际癌症研究协会(IASLC)病理分期系统对每个病例进行病理分级。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于评估复发分层的功效。一致性指数(C-index)和受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)用于评估不同分级系统对复发鉴别的临床效用。IASLC级别较低的患者显示出无复发生存率(RFS)的改善(P<;0.0001),其中II级和III级之间的数字差异(P=0.119)。通过整合IASLC分级系统和放射学特征,我们发现RFS率随着新的放射病理学(RP)分级系统的增加而降低(P<;0.0001)。根据RP分级系统,任意两组之间的RFS曲线差异具有统计学意义(RP I级vs RP II级,P=0.007;RP I级vs RP III级,P<;.0001;RP II级vs RP III级(P=0.0003)。与IASLC分级系统相比,RP分级系统显著提高了复发生存率的辨别能力(C指数:0.822;曲线下面积:0.845)。将影像学特征与病理分级系统相结合,提高了对切除的IA期LUAD复发辨别的效率,可能有助于进行后续处理。
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.