Safe duration of silicon catheter replacement in urological patients.

Q3 Medicine
Mawuenyo A Oyortey, Samuel A Essoun, Mahamudu A Ali, Mubarak Abdul-Rahman, James Welbeck, Jonathan C B Dakubo, James E Mensah
{"title":"Safe duration of silicon catheter replacement in urological patients.","authors":"Mawuenyo A Oyortey,&nbsp;Samuel A Essoun,&nbsp;Mahamudu A Ali,&nbsp;Mubarak Abdul-Rahman,&nbsp;James Welbeck,&nbsp;Jonathan C B Dakubo,&nbsp;James E Mensah","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v57i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the infection rates, degree of encrustation, symptoms, and complications in patients regarding the duration of urethral catheterisation (three weeks, six weeks, and eight weeks).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study with stratified simple random sampling.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urology Unit, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and thirty-seven male patients with long-term urinary catheters.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were grouped into 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks duration of catheter replacements.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes measures: </strong>Symptoms due to the urinary catheters, urinalysis, urine and catheter tip cultures, sensitivity, and catheter encrustations were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients had a primary diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 35 had urethral strictures,13 had prostate cancer, two had BPH and urethral strictures, and one participant had bladder cancer. There was no difference in the symptoms the participants in the different groups experienced due to the urinary catheters (p > 0.05). The frequency of occurrence of complications (pyuria, p = 0.784; blocked catheter, p=0.097; urethral bleeding, p=0.148; epididymo-orchitis, p=0.769 and bladder spasms, p=1.000) showed no differences in the three groups. There was no statistical difference in the urinalysis for the three groups (p>0.05) and the degree of encrustations (3 weeks: 0.03 ± 0.06, 6 weeks: 0.11±0.27 and eight weeks: 0.12 ±0.27) with p=0.065.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the duration of urinary catheterisation using silicone Foley's catheters did not influence the complication and symptom rates; hence silicon catheters can be placed in situ for up to 8 weeks before replacement instead of the traditional three-weekly change.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Enterprise Computing Limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":35509,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Medical Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v57i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the infection rates, degree of encrustation, symptoms, and complications in patients regarding the duration of urethral catheterisation (three weeks, six weeks, and eight weeks).

Design: A cross-sectional study with stratified simple random sampling.

Setting: Urology Unit, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

Participants: One hundred and thirty-seven male patients with long-term urinary catheters.

Interventions: Participants were grouped into 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks duration of catheter replacements.

Primary outcomes measures: Symptoms due to the urinary catheters, urinalysis, urine and catheter tip cultures, sensitivity, and catheter encrustations were assessed.

Results: Eighty-six patients had a primary diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 35 had urethral strictures,13 had prostate cancer, two had BPH and urethral strictures, and one participant had bladder cancer. There was no difference in the symptoms the participants in the different groups experienced due to the urinary catheters (p > 0.05). The frequency of occurrence of complications (pyuria, p = 0.784; blocked catheter, p=0.097; urethral bleeding, p=0.148; epididymo-orchitis, p=0.769 and bladder spasms, p=1.000) showed no differences in the three groups. There was no statistical difference in the urinalysis for the three groups (p>0.05) and the degree of encrustations (3 weeks: 0.03 ± 0.06, 6 weeks: 0.11±0.27 and eight weeks: 0.12 ±0.27) with p=0.065.

Conclusions: In this study, the duration of urinary catheterisation using silicone Foley's catheters did not influence the complication and symptom rates; hence silicon catheters can be placed in situ for up to 8 weeks before replacement instead of the traditional three-weekly change.

Funding: Enterprise Computing Limited.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泌尿外科患者硅导管置换术的安全持续时间。
目的:本研究比较尿路导尿时间(3周、6周和8周)患者的感染率、结痂程度、症状和并发症。设计:分层简单随机抽样的横断面研究。单位:科勒布教学医院泌尿科。研究对象:137例长期导尿的男性患者。干预措施:参与者被分为3周、6周和8周的导管置换时间。主要结局指标:评估导尿管引起的症状、尿液分析、尿液和导尿管尖端培养、敏感性和导尿管结痂。结果:86例患者首发诊断为良性前列腺增生(BPH), 35例合并尿道狭窄,13例合并前列腺癌,2例合并尿道狭窄,1例合并膀胱癌。两组患者因导尿管引起的症状差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。并发症发生率(脓尿,p = 0.784;导管阻塞,p=0.097;尿道出血,p=0.148;附睾-睾丸炎(p=0.769)和膀胱痉挛(p=1.000)三组间差异无统计学意义。三组患者尿液分析及结痂程度(3周:0.03±0.06、6周:0.11±0.27、8周:0.12±0.27)比较,差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05), p=0.065。结论:在本研究中,使用硅胶Foley导尿管的时间对并发症和症状发生率没有影响;因此,硅导管可以在原位放置长达8周,而不是传统的每三周更换一次。资助:企业计算有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ghana Medical Journal
Ghana Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信