A National Survey of Stress and Burnout in Critical Care Nurses: A Prepandemic Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Delwin Millan Villarante, Sharon C O'Donoghue, Monica Medeiros, Erin Milton, Kayley Walsh, Ashley L O'Donoghue, Leo Anthony Celi, Margaret M Hayes, Justin Dilibero
{"title":"A National Survey of Stress and Burnout in Critical Care Nurses: A Prepandemic Study.","authors":"Delwin Millan Villarante, Sharon C O'Donoghue, Monica Medeiros, Erin Milton, Kayley Walsh, Ashley L O'Donoghue, Leo Anthony Celi, Margaret M Hayes, Justin Dilibero","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical care nurses (CCNs) experience a higher level of stress and burnout than nurses in other specialties. Approximately 50% of CCNs are mildly stressed, and almost 20% are moderately stressed. Prolonged periods of stress can lead to burnout, which has been shown to have deleterious effects on quality and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of burnout among a national sample of CCNs and the association with environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey of CCNs working in the United States was implemented using an exploratory descriptive design. The anonymous survey was developed iteratively according to best practices of survey design. The survey included the Perceived Stress Scale and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory tool. Pretesting and pilot testing were conducted with CCN specialists, and the survey was revised based on their feedback. An anonymous link was distributed to respondents using convenience sampling through social media and further disseminated via snowball sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred seventy nurses responded to the survey. The mean (SD) Perceived Stress Scale score in the study population was 18.5 (6.4), indicating moderate stress. The mean (SD) Copenhagen Burnout Inventory score was 61.9 (16.5), indicating moderate burnout. Our study found that the overall health of the work environment was one of the most important factors associated with both stress and burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has demonstrated the relationship between the health of the work environment and burnout among CCNs. It is imperative that health care organizations evaluate and implement strategies to optimize the health of the work environment to mitigate burnout and its negative sequelae on the nurse, patient, and system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical care nurses (CCNs) experience a higher level of stress and burnout than nurses in other specialties. Approximately 50% of CCNs are mildly stressed, and almost 20% are moderately stressed. Prolonged periods of stress can lead to burnout, which has been shown to have deleterious effects on quality and patient safety.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of burnout among a national sample of CCNs and the association with environmental factors.

Methods: A national survey of CCNs working in the United States was implemented using an exploratory descriptive design. The anonymous survey was developed iteratively according to best practices of survey design. The survey included the Perceived Stress Scale and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory tool. Pretesting and pilot testing were conducted with CCN specialists, and the survey was revised based on their feedback. An anonymous link was distributed to respondents using convenience sampling through social media and further disseminated via snowball sampling.

Results: Two hundred seventy nurses responded to the survey. The mean (SD) Perceived Stress Scale score in the study population was 18.5 (6.4), indicating moderate stress. The mean (SD) Copenhagen Burnout Inventory score was 61.9 (16.5), indicating moderate burnout. Our study found that the overall health of the work environment was one of the most important factors associated with both stress and burnout.

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the relationship between the health of the work environment and burnout among CCNs. It is imperative that health care organizations evaluate and implement strategies to optimize the health of the work environment to mitigate burnout and its negative sequelae on the nurse, patient, and system.

全国重症监护护士压力和倦怠调查:一项产前研究。
背景:重症监护护士(CCNs)比其他专业的护士经历更高水平的压力和倦怠。大约50%的CCN处于轻度应力状态,近20%处于中度应力状态。长时间的压力会导致倦怠,这已被证明对质量和患者安全有有害影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定全国CCN样本中倦怠的患病率及其与环境因素的关系。方法:采用探索性描述性设计对在美国工作的CCN进行全国性调查。匿名调查是根据调查设计的最佳实践反复开发的。该调查包括感知压力量表和哥本哈根倦怠量表工具。CCN专家进行了预测试和试点测试,并根据他们的反馈对调查进行了修订。通过社交媒体方便抽样向受访者分发了一个匿名链接,并通过滚雪球抽样进一步传播。结果:270名护士对调查做出了回应。研究人群的平均(SD)感知压力量表得分为18.5(6.4),表明中度压力。哥本哈根倦怠量表的平均(SD)得分为61.9(16.5),表明中度倦怠。我们的研究发现,工作环境的整体健康是与压力和倦怠相关的最重要因素之一。结论:本研究揭示了CCN的工作环境健康与倦怠之间的关系。卫生保健组织必须评估和实施优化工作环境健康的策略,以减轻倦怠及其对护士、患者和系统的负面后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信