New perspectives on the genetic causes of diminished ovarian reserve and opportunities for genetic screening: systematic review and meta-analysis

Carleigh B. Nesbit D.O. , Jia Huang M.D., Ph.D. , Bhuchitra Singh M.D., M.P.H. , Jacqueline Y. Maher M.D. , Lisa M. Pastore Ph.D. , James Segars M.D.
{"title":"New perspectives on the genetic causes of diminished ovarian reserve and opportunities for genetic screening: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Carleigh B. Nesbit D.O. ,&nbsp;Jia Huang M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Bhuchitra Singh M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Y. Maher M.D. ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Pastore Ph.D. ,&nbsp;James Segars M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2020.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide an update on single-gene mutations identified as causative for pathologic diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) to inform clinical screening recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and EMBASE databases. Only full-text articles in English were included and articles were excluded that did not relate to single-gene causes of pathologic DOR in humans. The search was supplemented using references of the included articles. Primary outcomes included prevalence ratios (PRs) for 12 genes associated with pathologic DOR.</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>A total of 550 articles were screened, with 108 articles included for review. Fifteen observational studies had prevalence data available for quantitative analysis. Elevated prevalence ratios were found in women with DOR for the <span><em>FMR1</em></span> premutation and <em>FMR2</em> mutations as well as single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the <span><span><em>BMP15</em><em>, </em></span><em>GDF9</em><span><em>, </em><em>FSHR</em></span></span>, and <em>NOBOX</em> genes. Although some studies have suggested an increased prevalence of <span><em>BRCA1</em></span> and <span><em>BRCA2</em></span> mutations in women with DOR, the prevalence in the controls in the included studies was elevated and PRs did not achieve statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Women diagnosed with DOR are at an increased risk of carrying mutations in <em>FMR1</em>, <em>FMR2,</em> and variants in <em>BMP15, GDF9, FSHR</em>, and <em>NOBOX</em> genes. Of these, the only gene identified as having the potential to cause significant deleterious effects in offspring is the <em>FMR1</em> premutation, which supports current national screening guidelines. Further studies of <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> are needed to determine whether pathologic DOR might be associated with mutations in those genes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xfnr.2020.06.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571920300025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To provide an update on single-gene mutations identified as causative for pathologic diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) to inform clinical screening recommendations.

Evidence Review

A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and EMBASE databases. Only full-text articles in English were included and articles were excluded that did not relate to single-gene causes of pathologic DOR in humans. The search was supplemented using references of the included articles. Primary outcomes included prevalence ratios (PRs) for 12 genes associated with pathologic DOR.

Result(s)

A total of 550 articles were screened, with 108 articles included for review. Fifteen observational studies had prevalence data available for quantitative analysis. Elevated prevalence ratios were found in women with DOR for the FMR1 premutation and FMR2 mutations as well as single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the BMP15, GDF9, FSHR, and NOBOX genes. Although some studies have suggested an increased prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with DOR, the prevalence in the controls in the included studies was elevated and PRs did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusion(s)

Women diagnosed with DOR are at an increased risk of carrying mutations in FMR1, FMR2, and variants in BMP15, GDF9, FSHR, and NOBOX genes. Of these, the only gene identified as having the potential to cause significant deleterious effects in offspring is the FMR1 premutation, which supports current national screening guidelines. Further studies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 are needed to determine whether pathologic DOR might be associated with mutations in those genes.

卵巢储备功能减退的遗传原因和遗传筛查机会的新观点:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的为临床筛查建议提供关于病理性卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)的单基因突变的最新信息。依据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库对文献进行系统评价。仅纳入英文全文文章,并排除与人类病理性DOR的单基因原因无关的文章。使用纳入文章的参考文献来补充检索。主要结局包括与病理性dor相关的12个基因的患病率(pr)。结果共筛选了550篇文章,其中108篇纳入综述。15项观察性研究的患病率数据可用于定量分析。DOR女性中FMR1预突变和FMR2突变以及BMP15、GDF9、FSHR和NOBOX基因的单核苷酸多态性发生率升高。尽管一些研究表明DOR女性中BRCA1和BRCA2突变的患病率增加,但在纳入的研究中,对照组的患病率升高,pr没有达到统计学意义。结论(5)诊断为DOR的女性携带FMR1、FMR2突变以及BMP15、GDF9、FSHR和NOBOX基因变异的风险增加。在这些基因中,唯一被确定有可能对后代造成重大有害影响的基因是FMR1预突变,它支持当前的国家筛查指南。需要进一步研究BRCA1和BRCA2来确定病理性DOR是否与这些基因的突变有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信