The Relationship between Capital Domains and Resilience in Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arief Hargono, Febi Dwirahmadi, Kurnia Dwi Artanti, Erni Astutik, Siti Shofiya Novita Sari, Febriyanti
{"title":"The Relationship between Capital Domains and Resilience in Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia.","authors":"Arief Hargono,&nbsp;Febi Dwirahmadi,&nbsp;Kurnia Dwi Artanti,&nbsp;Erni Astutik,&nbsp;Siti Shofiya Novita Sari,&nbsp;Febriyanti","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v33i3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strengthening disaster resilience is important to protect existing development and in anticipation of various disasters and risks due to disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to determine resilience among individuals in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia based on the capital domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a cross-sectional design with 97 Indonesian people and was conducted using an online survey in May-December 2020. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The results showed that 45.36% of the respondents had low resilience. Respondents whose expenses increased had 6.36 times higher odds of good resilience compared to respondents whose expenses decreased (AOR=6.36,95%CI=1.26-32,p=0.025). Respondents whose expenses were not affected had 12.32 times higher odds of having good resilience than respondents whose expenses were reduced (AOR=12.32,95%CI=1.82-83.40, p=0.01). Respondents with larger families had 32% lower odds of having good resilience than those with fewer family members (AOR=0.68, 95%CI=0.47-0.98, p=0.038). Respondents with no quarantine facilities had 65% lower odds of good resilience than those with quarantine facilities (AOR=0.35, 95%CI 0.13-0.95, p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Economic and physical capital as the part of capital domains showed a significant association with resilience during COVID-19 pandemics. Economic capital variables that had association with resilience were money expenses and the number of family members in household. Physical capital had a relationship with resilience were the availability of quarantine facilities. Government could encourage cooperation within the community to share economic resources. Local government could provide isolation facilities in local area.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"33 3","pages":"391-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Strengthening disaster resilience is important to protect existing development and in anticipation of various disasters and risks due to disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to determine resilience among individuals in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia based on the capital domains.

Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with 97 Indonesian people and was conducted using an online survey in May-December 2020. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

Result: The results showed that 45.36% of the respondents had low resilience. Respondents whose expenses increased had 6.36 times higher odds of good resilience compared to respondents whose expenses decreased (AOR=6.36,95%CI=1.26-32,p=0.025). Respondents whose expenses were not affected had 12.32 times higher odds of having good resilience than respondents whose expenses were reduced (AOR=12.32,95%CI=1.82-83.40, p=0.01). Respondents with larger families had 32% lower odds of having good resilience than those with fewer family members (AOR=0.68, 95%CI=0.47-0.98, p=0.038). Respondents with no quarantine facilities had 65% lower odds of good resilience than those with quarantine facilities (AOR=0.35, 95%CI 0.13-0.95, p=0.04).

Conclusion: Economic and physical capital as the part of capital domains showed a significant association with resilience during COVID-19 pandemics. Economic capital variables that had association with resilience were money expenses and the number of family members in household. Physical capital had a relationship with resilience were the availability of quarantine facilities. Government could encourage cooperation within the community to share economic resources. Local government could provide isolation facilities in local area.

资本领域与印尼应对COVID-19大流行韧性的关系
背景:加强抗灾能力对于保护现有发展以及应对COVID-19大流行等灾害和风险至关重要。本研究旨在根据首都域确定印度尼西亚个人应对COVID-19大流行的复原力。方法:本研究采用横断面设计,于2020年5月至12月对97名印度尼西亚人进行在线调查。数据分析采用多变量逻辑回归。结果:45.36%的被调查者心理弹性较低。支出增加的受访者具有良好弹性的几率是支出减少的受访者的6.36倍(AOR=6.36,95%CI=1.26-32,p=0.025)。支出不受影响的被调查者具有良好弹性的几率比支出减少的被调查者高12.32倍(AOR=12.32,95%CI=1.82 ~ 83.40, p=0.01)。与家庭成员较少的受访者相比,家庭成员较多的受访者具有良好弹性的几率低32% (AOR=0.68, 95%CI=0.47-0.98, p=0.038)。没有隔离设施的应答者与有隔离设施的应答者相比,良好恢复力的几率低65% (AOR=0.35, 95%CI 0.13-0.95, p=0.04)。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,经济和物质资本作为资本领域的一部分与韧性存在显著关联。与弹性相关的经济资本变量为货币支出和家庭成员数量。实物资本与复原力有关系的是检疫设施的可用性。政府可以鼓励社区内的合作,共享经济资源。当地政府可在当地提供隔离设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信