Association between dental procedures and periprosthetic joint infection: A case-crossover study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Soichiro Masuda , Toshiki Fukasawa , Masato Takeuchi , Korenori Arai , Shuichi Matsuda , Koji Kawakami
{"title":"Association between dental procedures and periprosthetic joint infection: A case-crossover study","authors":"Soichiro Masuda ,&nbsp;Toshiki Fukasawa ,&nbsp;Masato Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Korenori Arai ,&nbsp;Shuichi Matsuda ,&nbsp;Koji Kawakami","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although the risk of dental procedures<span> as a cause of bacteremia<span> has been recognized, evidence regarding the association between dental procedures and late periprosthetic joint infection (LPJI) is scarce. We sought to determine whether dental procedures are associated with an increased risk of LPJI.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted under a case-crossover design using a large claims database in Japan. We identified adult patients who had undergone dental procedures and were hospitalized for LPJI between April 2014 and September 2021. Exposure to dental procedures was assessed during a case period of 1–4 weeks, with two control periods of 9–12 weeks and 17–20 weeks, preceding LPJI hospital admission. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of LPJI associated with dental procedures in the case period compared with the two control periods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 241 patients with LPJI were included in the case-crossover study. At least one dental procedure was performed in 46 patients (19.1%) in the hazard period and in 75 patients (31.1%) in the control periods. The OR for LPJI with dental procedures was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.61–1.53; p = 0.88). Findings were robust in several sensitivity analyses, including stratification by whether the dental procedure included antibiotic prophylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests that dental procedures are not associated with increased risk of LPJI, and will raise questions about the recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265823002063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although the risk of dental procedures as a cause of bacteremia has been recognized, evidence regarding the association between dental procedures and late periprosthetic joint infection (LPJI) is scarce. We sought to determine whether dental procedures are associated with an increased risk of LPJI.

Methods

The study was conducted under a case-crossover design using a large claims database in Japan. We identified adult patients who had undergone dental procedures and were hospitalized for LPJI between April 2014 and September 2021. Exposure to dental procedures was assessed during a case period of 1–4 weeks, with two control periods of 9–12 weeks and 17–20 weeks, preceding LPJI hospital admission. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of LPJI associated with dental procedures in the case period compared with the two control periods.

Results

In total, 241 patients with LPJI were included in the case-crossover study. At least one dental procedure was performed in 46 patients (19.1%) in the hazard period and in 75 patients (31.1%) in the control periods. The OR for LPJI with dental procedures was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.61–1.53; p = 0.88). Findings were robust in several sensitivity analyses, including stratification by whether the dental procedure included antibiotic prophylaxis.

Conclusions

This study suggests that dental procedures are not associated with increased risk of LPJI, and will raise questions about the recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis before dental procedures.

牙科手术与假体周围关节感染之间的关系:病例交叉研究
背景:尽管牙科手术作为菌血症病因的风险已得到认可,但有关牙科手术与晚期假体周围关节感染(LPJI)之间关系的证据却很少。我们试图确定牙科手术是否与 LPJI 风险增加有关:研究采用病例交叉设计,使用日本的大型索赔数据库。我们确定了在 2014 年 4 月至 2021 年 9 月期间接受过牙科手术并因 LPJI 住院的成年患者。在LPJI入院前1-4周的病例期和9-12周和17-20周的两个对照期对牙科手术暴露进行了评估。采用条件逻辑回归模型计算病例期与两个对照期牙科手术相关的LPJI几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):病例交叉研究共纳入了 241 名 LPJI 患者。46名患者(19.1%)在危险期进行了至少一次牙科手术,75名患者(31.1%)在对照期进行了至少一次牙科手术。进行牙科手术的 LPJI OR 为 0.96 (95% CI, 0.61-1.53; p = 0.88)。在几项敏感性分析中,包括根据牙科手术是否包括抗生素预防进行分层,结果都很可靠:这项研究表明,牙科手术与 LPJI 风险的增加无关,并将对牙科手术前使用抗生素预防的建议提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信